Experimental and Numerical Investigations of the Borehole Ballooning inRough Fractures
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Borehole Ballooning in Rough Fractures M. Ozdemirtas; M. Ozdemirtas University of Alberta Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar T. Babadagli; T. Babadagli University of Alberta Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar E. Kuru E. Kuru University of Alberta Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, U.S.A., November 2007. Paper Number: SPE-110121-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/110121-MS Published: November 11 2007 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Ozdemirtas, M., Babadagli, T., and E. Kuru. "Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Borehole Ballooning in Rough Fractures." Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, U.S.A., November 2007. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/110121-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search Abstract Borehole ballooning/breathing is a combined mud loss/gain event observed during drilling operations in naturally fractured formations. Factors controlling this phenomenon must be well understood to correctly interpret its symptoms observed during drilling to avoid mixing ballooning with other formation flow incidents which might lead to unwarranted well control procedures.A mathematical model defining the ballooning process was developed and solved numerically using finite difference approximation. It was shown that fracture roughness and fracture deformation play a significant role on the flow of drilling fluid in and out of a single fracture. In this study, the focus was mainly on the effect of fracture roughness (characterized by the fractal dimension of the fracture surface) and fracture aperture.The main goal of this work was to compare the numerical model results with the laboratory scale experimental observations. Therefore, experiments were performed to study the mud loss and gain events in artificially fractured rock samples. One-inch diameter and 3-inches long cylindirical samples of Berea sandstone, Indiana limestone and granite were used for the experiments. Two different fracture types were used to analyze the effect of fracture surface roughness on the flow of drilling fluid in and out of the fracture. In order to create smooth fracture surfaces, cores were cut precisely into two equal pieces using a blade. Alternatively, axial load was applied on the cylindrical rock samples until a longitudinal fracture with rough surface was generated.The results of experimental observations and numerical model study on the importance of fracture roughness were provided. Situations where the degree of roughness becomes critical were identified. Keywords: hydraulic fracturing, fracture characterization, roughness, injection pressure, Reservoir Characterization, Upstream Oil & Gas, Artificial Intelligence, aperture, borehole pressure 200, borehole ballooning Subjects: Pressure Management, Hydraulic Fracturing, Reservoir Characterization, Well control, Faults and fracture characterization Copyright 2007, Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle