The 8th ISNS European Neonatal Screening Regional Meeting. 4–6 November, 2012, Budapest, Hungary
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Plenary Lecture: \n \n1. Sabina Gallati: Genotype-phenotype association in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) – The Impact of Immunoreactive Trypsinogen (IRT) \n \nNeonatal Screening: A Continuous Challenge: \n \n1. J. Gerard Loeber: The Recommendations of the 2011 European Survey on Neonatal Screening, and Now What? \n2. Rodney Pollitt: Defining the Aims of Newborn Screening: Fuzz or Focus? \n3. R. Rodney Howell - Michele A. Lloyd-Puryear: Current Newborn Screening Practices Across the Globe: Can We Standardize? \n4. Kee Chan: A Logic Model for Genome Sequencing in Newborn Screening Programs (GNBS) \n5. Jill Levy-Fisch: Newborn Screening – Video from Save Babies Through Screening Foundation \n \nCystic Fibrosis: \n \n1. Kevin W. Southern: The Challenges of Establishing Newborn Screening for CF Across Europe \n2. Peter Schielen - Bert Elvers - J. Gerard Loeber [et al.]: Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in The Netherlands \n3. Geraldine Roche - Claire Greenwood - Deirdre Cooney [et al.]: Newborn Screening for CF in Ireland – The First Year Experience \n4. Agnieszka Sobczynska-Tomaszewska - Mariusz Oltarzewski - Kamila Czerska [et al.]: Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis – Polish Four Years’ Experience with CFTR-EDA Strategy \n5. Emma Lundman - Olav Trond Storrøsten - Rolf D. Pettersen: Using Population Specific CFTR Disease Causing Mutation Data \nfor Implementation of 3. Tier Cystic Fibrosis Screening in Norway \n \nFree Presentations: \n \n1. W. Harry Hannon: A Global Standard: Blood Collection on Filter Paper for Newborn Screening Programs (LA04-A6)-- New 2012 Edition \n2. Bradford Therrell - W. Harry Hannon: Issues and Recommendations in the US Regarding the Retention and Use of Dried Bloodspot Specimens After Newborn Screening \n3. Janet Marcadier - Jennifer Milburn - Beth Potter [et al.]: Newborn Screening in Ontario: Process for Addition and Review \n4. Dimitar Gavrilov - Coleman Turgeon - Mark Magera [et al.]: Determination of Ethylmalonic Acid, Methylsuccinic Acid, Glutaric Acid, 3-Hydroxyglutaric Acid, and 2-Hydroxyglutaric Acid in Dried Blood Spots by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry \n5. Eva Hlidkova - Lukáš Najdekr - David Friedecky [et al.]: Identification of Novel Biomarkers of Medium Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency Using Untargeted Metabolomic Approach \n6. Denis C. Lehotay - Braden Fitterer - Nick Antonishyn [et al.]: Integration of Molecular and Biochemical Methods of Newborn Screening in Saskatchewan \n7. Sarah Smith - Joan Mackenzie - E. Chalmers E: Evaluation of a Selective Screening Strategy for Sickle Cell Disorder \nin the Scottish Newborn Population \n \nLysosomal Storage Disorders: \n \n1. David Kasper: Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders: \nClinical Considerations and Challenges \n2. Arndt Rolfs: Introduction of a New Method of LSD Screening \n3. Adriana M. Montaño: Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses \n4. Dietrich Matern - Devin Oglesbee - Fred Lorey [et al.]: Newborn Screening (NBS) for Lysosomal Storage Disorders (LSD), Friedreich Ataxia, Wilson Disease and X-Adrenoleukodystrophy. A Comparative Effectiveness Study \n \nNational Screening Programs: \n \n1. Júlia Dénes - Eszter Szabó - Ildikó Szatmári [et al.]: National Screening Programs – Developments at the Budapest Screening Centre \n2. Maria Knapkova - Svetozar Dluholucky - Miroslava Zahorcova: Newborn Screening in Slovakia – What News \n3. Dana Teodora Anton - Liliana Maria Iliescu - Georgeta Diaconu: Results of Implementation of Newborn Screening Programme in the North-East Part of Romania \n4. Natalia Usurelu - Vasile Burgoci - Kiril Boiciuc [et al.]: Phenylketonuria in Moldova – Neonatal Screening About 20 Years \n5. Zuhair Rahbeeni - Amal Al-Hashim - Ali Al-Odaib: Neonatal Screening Program in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: 7 Years Experience, Positive Impact on Developmental Milestone and Compliance to Diet \n6. Hilde Laeremans: Neonatal screening in Belgium \n7. Ulrika von Döbeln: Neonatal screening in Sweden \n8. A. Chodunova - P. Novikov - V. Mitkin: The First Results of Expanded Newborn Screening for Inherited Metabolic Diseases in the Russian Federation \n9. Mari-Liis Uudelepp - M. Teder-Laving: Newborn Screening in Estonia: Current Situation and Future Developments \n10. Rolf D. Pettersen: Expanded Newborn Screening in Norway \n \nCongenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: \n \n1. Toni Torresani: Screening for CAH: How to Avoid Not Necessary Recalls? \n2. Iva Stoeva - Antoaneta Kostova - Ani Aroyo [et al.]: The 17 OHP Neonatal Screening in Bulgaria: First Results \n3. Heather Brown - Claudia Rossi - Lisa Calton: Quantification of 17-Hydroxyprogesterone from Dried Blood Spots Using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry \n4. Ingjerd Saeves - Jens Vejlemand Joergensen - Rolf Dagfinn Pettersen: Newborn Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Comparison of 1. Tier Immunoassay on GSP and 2. Tier Hormone Assessments with Tandem Mass Spectrometry \n5. Zoltán Lukács - Paulina Nieves Cobos: Evaluation of the Luminex NeoPlex4 and NeoPlex System for Analysis of T4, TSH, 17-OHP and IRT for Newborn Screening for Congenital \nHypothryroidism, Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, and Cystic Fibrosis \n6. Paul Griffiths - Deborah Finnerty - Russell Denmeade: An Evaluation of the Luminex NeoPlex Analyser in a Routine Newborn Screening Laboratory \n \nSevere Combined Immune Deficiency: \n1. László Maródi: Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies \n2. Lennart Hammarström: Advances in Neonatal Screening for Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases \n3. Fred Lorey: Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency (SCID) in California \n4. Stephan Borte: Screening for SCID and XLA Using High-Throughput Triplex Real-Time PCR \n \nCongenital Hypothyroidism: \n1. Iva Stoeva - Antoaneta Kostova - Radoslava Emilova [et al.]: The Bulgarian Neonatal Thyroid Screening (NTS) Programme 1993–2011 \n2. Viacheslav Mitkin - Elena Denisenkova - Valentina Mitkina: Incidence of Congenital Hypothyroidism (CH) in Moscow City: The Results of Neonatal Screening for 5 Years \n3. Nina Gusina - Alexander Zinovik - Tatyana Kolkova: The Results of Population Neonatal Screening for Congenital Hypothyroidism in Belarus \n4. Violeta Anastasovska - Mirjana Kocova: Ten Years Experience with Neonatal Screening of Congenital Hypothyroidism in the Republic of Macedonia \n \nPosters: \n1. Scott Palubiak - Michele Lloyd-Puryear - Bradford Therrell [et al.]: Survive and Thrive: A Global Alliance \n2. Zuhair Rahbeeni - Amal Hashem - Mohamed Soukri: The Impacts of Early Diagnosis of Inherited Metabolic Disorders \non the Outcome \n3. Ali Al-Odaib - Ayman Al-Sulaiman - Mohammad Saeedi [et al.]: Evaluating Healthcare Professional’ Views Towards Newborn Screening in Saudi Arabia \n4. Issam Khneisser - Pascale Karam - Salim Adib [et al.]: Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Metabolism: A Possible Cost-Saving Model \n5. Petr Chrastina - Renata Balounova - Josef Bartl [et al.]: How to Set Markers and Cut-Offs for Neonatal Screening of Inherited Metabolic Disorders \n6. Janet Marcadier - Jennifer Milburn - Christine Davies [et al.]: When Infants Screen Positive for Multiple Diseases \n7. Jennifer Milburn - Janet Marcadier - Isabella Rogers [et al.]: Alerts of Potential Missed Screens in Ontario, Canada \n8. Felix Votava - Petr Chrastina - Viktor Kožich [et al.]: Expansion of Neonatal Screening in the Czech Republic \n9. Dobry Dimitrov - Maria Ivanova - Ivanka Sinigerska [et al.]: MS/MS Technology for Neonatal Screening and Selective Screening Program of Inherited Metabolic Diseases in Bulgaria \n10. Dobry Dimitrov - Maria Ivanova - Ivanka Sinigerska [et al.]: Improvements in the Bulgarian Newborn Screening Program and Selective screening for Inherited Metabolic Diseases by Tandem Mass Spectrometry \n11. Isabela Tarcomnicu - Andreea Rusu - Vasilica Plaiasu [et al.]: Extended Newborn Screening in Romanian Population – A Statistical Evaluation After One year of Experience \n12. Otilia Marginean - Marinela Lesovici - Andreea Militaru-Somogy [et al.]: Actual State of Neonatal Screening in South–West of Romania \n13. Radoslava Vazharova - Irena Bradinova - Maria Ivanova [et al.]: Bulgarian Mass Newborn Screening Programme for PKU and Other Inborn Errors of Metabolism – New Perspectives \n14. Ágnes Schuler - Péter Reismann - Erika Kiss [et al.]: Maternal Phenylketonuria: Report from the Budapest Registry 1975–2011 \n15. Erika Kiss - János Bókay - László Szőnyi: Which Are the Most Important Influencing Factors on the Phenylketonuria Patients to the Long-Range Adherence of Phenylalanine Restricted Diet? \n16. Sanna Rönnmark - Liisa Meriö - Maija-Liisa Mäkinen [et al.]: Development of an Automated Phenylalanine Assay for Screening of Phenylketonuria \n17. Mirjana Kocova - Violeta Anastasovska: Macedonian Newborns with Congenital Hypothyroidism Detected by Thyroid Neonatal Screening During 2002–2011 \n18. István Lénárt - Melinda Rózsa - Aranka László [et al.]: Screening of Galactosaemia at the Screening Centre University of Szeged \n19. Telle Ukonaho - Jonne Vaarno - Ville Laitala [et al.]: Automated Total Galactose (TGal) Assay for Newborn Screening \n20. Johanna Tamminen - Elina Tuomola - Pekka Mattsson [et al.]: Development of an Automated Biotinidase (BTD) Assay for Newborn Screening \n21. Svetozár Dluholucký - Maria Knapková - Marek Svitok: Ethnic Differencies in Immunoreactive Trypsinogen Levels in Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis \n22. Andrey Kirov - Albena Todorova - Tihomir Todorov [et al.]: CYP21A2 Mutations Screening Strategy in Bulgarian CAH Patients \n23. Trine Tang
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle