MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4241173928 · doi:10.1556/oh.2012.29501

The 8th ISNS European Neonatal Screening Regional Meeting. 4–6 November, 2012, Budapest, Hungary

2012· article· en· W4241173928 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOrvosi Hetilap · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFamily medicinePolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plenary Lecture:
\n
\n1. Sabina Gallati: Genotype-phenotype association in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) – The Impact of Immunoreactive Trypsinogen (IRT)
\n
\nNeonatal Screening: A Continuous Challenge:
\n
\n1. J. Gerard Loeber: The Recommendations of the 2011 European Survey on Neonatal Screening, and Now What?
\n2. Rodney Pollitt: Defining the Aims of Newborn Screening: Fuzz or Focus?
\n3. R. Rodney Howell - Michele A. Lloyd-Puryear: Current Newborn Screening Practices Across the Globe: Can We Standardize?
\n4. Kee Chan: A Logic Model for Genome Sequencing in Newborn Screening Programs (GNBS)
\n5. Jill Levy-Fisch: Newborn Screening – Video from Save Babies Through Screening Foundation
\n
\nCystic Fibrosis:
\n
\n1. Kevin W. Southern: The Challenges of Establishing Newborn Screening for CF Across Europe
\n2. Peter Schielen - Bert Elvers - J. Gerard Loeber [et al.]: Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in The Netherlands
\n3. Geraldine Roche - Claire Greenwood - Deirdre Cooney [et al.]: Newborn Screening for CF in Ireland – The First Year Experience
\n4. Agnieszka Sobczynska-Tomaszewska - Mariusz Oltarzewski - Kamila Czerska [et al.]: Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis – Polish Four Years’ Experience with CFTR-EDA Strategy
\n5. Emma Lundman - Olav Trond Storrøsten - Rolf D. Pettersen: Using Population Specific CFTR Disease Causing Mutation Data
\nfor Implementation of 3. Tier Cystic Fibrosis Screening in Norway
\n
\nFree Presentations:
\n
\n1. W. Harry Hannon: A Global Standard: Blood Collection on Filter Paper for Newborn Screening Programs (LA04-A6)-- New 2012 Edition
\n2. Bradford Therrell - W. Harry Hannon: Issues and Recommendations in the US Regarding the Retention and Use of Dried Bloodspot Specimens After Newborn Screening
\n3. Janet Marcadier - Jennifer Milburn - Beth Potter [et al.]: Newborn Screening in Ontario: Process for Addition and Review
\n4. Dimitar Gavrilov - Coleman Turgeon - Mark Magera [et al.]: Determination of Ethylmalonic Acid, Methylsuccinic Acid, Glutaric Acid, 3-Hydroxyglutaric Acid, and 2-Hydroxyglutaric Acid in Dried Blood Spots by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
\n5. Eva Hlidkova - Lukáš Najdekr - David Friedecky [et al.]: Identification of Novel Biomarkers of Medium Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency Using Untargeted Metabolomic Approach
\n6. Denis C. Lehotay - Braden Fitterer - Nick Antonishyn [et al.]: Integration of Molecular and Biochemical Methods of Newborn Screening in Saskatchewan
\n7. Sarah Smith - Joan Mackenzie - E. Chalmers E: Evaluation of a Selective Screening Strategy for Sickle Cell Disorder
\nin the Scottish Newborn Population
\n
\nLysosomal Storage Disorders:
\n
\n1. David Kasper: Screening for Lysosomal Storage Disorders:
\nClinical Considerations and Challenges
\n2. Arndt Rolfs: Introduction of a New Method of LSD Screening
\n3. Adriana M. Montaño: Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses
\n4. Dietrich Matern - Devin Oglesbee - Fred Lorey [et al.]: Newborn Screening (NBS) for Lysosomal Storage Disorders (LSD), Friedreich Ataxia, Wilson Disease and X-Adrenoleukodystrophy. A Comparative Effectiveness Study
\n
\nNational Screening Programs:
\n
\n1. Júlia Dénes - Eszter Szabó - Ildikó Szatmári [et al.]: National Screening Programs – Developments at the Budapest Screening Centre
\n2. Maria Knapkova - Svetozar Dluholucky - Miroslava Zahorcova: Newborn Screening in Slovakia – What News
\n3. Dana Teodora Anton - Liliana Maria Iliescu - Georgeta Diaconu: Results of Implementation of Newborn Screening Programme in the North-East Part of Romania
\n4. Natalia Usurelu - Vasile Burgoci - Kiril Boiciuc [et al.]: Phenylketonuria in Moldova – Neonatal Screening About 20 Years
\n5. Zuhair Rahbeeni - Amal Al-Hashim - Ali Al-Odaib: Neonatal Screening Program in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: 7 Years Experience, Positive Impact on Developmental Milestone and Compliance to Diet
\n6. Hilde Laeremans: Neonatal screening in Belgium
\n7. Ulrika von Döbeln: Neonatal screening in Sweden
\n8. A. Chodunova - P. Novikov - V. Mitkin: The First Results of Expanded Newborn Screening for Inherited Metabolic Diseases in the Russian Federation
\n9. Mari-Liis Uudelepp - M. Teder-Laving: Newborn Screening in Estonia: Current Situation and Future Developments
\n10. Rolf D. Pettersen: Expanded Newborn Screening in Norway
\n
\nCongenital Adrenal Hyperplasia:
\n
\n1. Toni Torresani: Screening for CAH: How to Avoid Not Necessary Recalls?
\n2. Iva Stoeva - Antoaneta Kostova - Ani Aroyo [et al.]: The 17 OHP Neonatal Screening in Bulgaria: First Results
\n3. Heather Brown - Claudia Rossi - Lisa Calton: Quantification of 17-Hydroxyprogesterone from Dried Blood Spots Using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
\n4. Ingjerd Saeves - Jens Vejlemand Joergensen - Rolf Dagfinn Pettersen: Newborn Screening for Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Comparison of 1. Tier Immunoassay on GSP and 2. Tier Hormone Assessments with Tandem Mass Spectrometry
\n5. Zoltán Lukács - Paulina Nieves Cobos: Evaluation of the Luminex NeoPlex4 and NeoPlex System for Analysis of T4, TSH, 17-OHP and IRT for Newborn Screening for Congenital
\nHypothryroidism, Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, and Cystic Fibrosis
\n6. Paul Griffiths - Deborah Finnerty - Russell Denmeade: An Evaluation of the Luminex NeoPlex Analyser in a Routine Newborn Screening Laboratory
\n
\nSevere Combined Immune Deficiency:
\n1. László Maródi: Severe Combined Immunodeficiencies
\n2. Lennart Hammarström: Advances in Neonatal Screening for Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases
\n3. Fred Lorey: Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immune Deficiency (SCID) in California
\n4. Stephan Borte: Screening for SCID and XLA Using High-Throughput Triplex Real-Time PCR
\n
\nCongenital Hypothyroidism:
\n1. Iva Stoeva - Antoaneta Kostova - Radoslava Emilova [et al.]: The Bulgarian Neonatal Thyroid Screening (NTS) Programme 1993–2011
\n2. Viacheslav Mitkin - Elena Denisenkova - Valentina Mitkina: Incidence of Congenital Hypothyroidism (CH) in Moscow City: The Results of Neonatal Screening for 5 Years
\n3. Nina Gusina - Alexander Zinovik - Tatyana Kolkova: The Results of Population Neonatal Screening for Congenital Hypothyroidism in Belarus
\n4. Violeta Anastasovska - Mirjana Kocova: Ten Years Experience with Neonatal Screening of Congenital Hypothyroidism in the Republic of Macedonia
\n
\nPosters:
\n1. Scott Palubiak - Michele Lloyd-Puryear - Bradford Therrell [et al.]: Survive and Thrive: A Global Alliance
\n2. Zuhair Rahbeeni - Amal Hashem - Mohamed Soukri: The Impacts of Early Diagnosis of Inherited Metabolic Disorders
\non the Outcome
\n3. Ali Al-Odaib - Ayman Al-Sulaiman - Mohammad Saeedi [et al.]: Evaluating Healthcare Professional’ Views Towards Newborn Screening in Saudi Arabia
\n4. Issam Khneisser - Pascale Karam - Salim Adib [et al.]: Newborn Screening for Inborn Errors of Metabolism: A Possible Cost-Saving Model
\n5. Petr Chrastina - Renata Balounova - Josef Bartl [et al.]: How to Set Markers and Cut-Offs for Neonatal Screening of Inherited Metabolic Disorders
\n6. Janet Marcadier - Jennifer Milburn - Christine Davies [et al.]: When Infants Screen Positive for Multiple Diseases
\n7. Jennifer Milburn - Janet Marcadier - Isabella Rogers [et al.]: Alerts of Potential Missed Screens in Ontario, Canada
\n8. Felix Votava - Petr Chrastina - Viktor Kožich [et al.]: Expansion of Neonatal Screening in the Czech Republic
\n9. Dobry Dimitrov - Maria Ivanova - Ivanka Sinigerska [et al.]: MS/MS Technology for Neonatal Screening and Selective Screening Program of Inherited Metabolic Diseases in Bulgaria
\n10. Dobry Dimitrov - Maria Ivanova - Ivanka Sinigerska [et al.]: Improvements in the Bulgarian Newborn Screening Program and Selective screening for Inherited Metabolic Diseases by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
\n11. Isabela Tarcomnicu - Andreea Rusu - Vasilica Plaiasu [et al.]: Extended Newborn Screening in Romanian Population – A Statistical Evaluation After One year of Experience
\n12. Otilia Marginean - Marinela Lesovici - Andreea Militaru-Somogy [et al.]: Actual State of Neonatal Screening in South–West of Romania
\n13. Radoslava Vazharova - Irena Bradinova - Maria Ivanova [et al.]: Bulgarian Mass Newborn Screening Programme for PKU and Other Inborn Errors of Metabolism – New Perspectives
\n14. Ágnes Schuler - Péter Reismann - Erika Kiss [et al.]: Maternal Phenylketonuria: Report from the Budapest Registry 1975–2011
\n15. Erika Kiss - János Bókay - László Szőnyi: Which Are the Most Important Influencing Factors on the Phenylketonuria Patients to the Long-Range Adherence of Phenylalanine Restricted Diet?
\n16. Sanna Rönnmark - Liisa Meriö - Maija-Liisa Mäkinen [et al.]: Development of an Automated Phenylalanine Assay for Screening of Phenylketonuria
\n17. Mirjana Kocova - Violeta Anastasovska: Macedonian Newborns with Congenital Hypothyroidism Detected by Thyroid Neonatal Screening During 2002–2011
\n18. István Lénárt - Melinda Rózsa - Aranka László [et al.]: Screening of Galactosaemia at the Screening Centre University of Szeged
\n19. Telle Ukonaho - Jonne Vaarno - Ville Laitala [et al.]: Automated Total Galactose (TGal) Assay for Newborn Screening
\n20. Johanna Tamminen - Elina Tuomola - Pekka Mattsson [et al.]: Development of an Automated Biotinidase (BTD) Assay for Newborn Screening
\n21. Svetozár Dluholucký - Maria Knapková - Marek Svitok: Ethnic Differencies in Immunoreactive Trypsinogen Levels in Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis
\n22. Andrey Kirov - Albena Todorova - Tihomir Todorov [et al.]: CYP21A2 Mutations Screening Strategy in Bulgarian CAH Patients
\n23. Trine Tang

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrvosi HetilapSame topicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia StudiesFrench-language works237,207