MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4241180781 · doi:10.1149/ma2014-02/21/1032

OpenFCST: An Open-Source Mathematical Modelling Software for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells

2014· article· en· W4241180781 sur OpenAlexaff
Marc Secanell, Andreas Pütz, Phillip Wardlaw, Valentin Zingan, Madhur Bhaiya, M. S. Moore, Jie Zhou, Chad Balen, Kailyn Domican

Notice bibliographique

RevueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueFuel Cells and Related Materials
Établissements canadiensAutomotive Fuel Cell Cooperation (Canada)University of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésElectrolyteComputer scienceMaterials scienceChemical engineeringProcess engineeringChemistryEngineeringPhysical chemistryElectrode

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the past two decades a myriad of polymer electrolyte fuel cell mathematical models have been proposed in the literature [1]. Fuel cell models with different mass, heat and charge transport, and electrochemical reaction mechanisms have been studied. Multi-scale catalyst layer representations, such as agglomerate models, have also been presented. Even though a large number of mathematical models have been proposed, direct comparisons of different catalyst layer models have seldom been performed. A detailed quantitative assessment of the effect of different physical processes, such as thermal-osmosis in water transport, has also not been performed. Such comparative studies have been difficult to undertake because most polymer electrolyte modeling work in the literature is typically based on different governing equations and/or a different set of fuel cell input parameters. OpenFCST is a finite element method based, open-source, mathematical modeling software for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. The aim of the software is to develop a platform for collaborative development of fuel cell models and for assessing the impact of different models in the literature. The software is well documented, contains several sample models, and it is available for download online at http://www.openfcst.mece.ualberta.ca/. The software currently contains a library of governing equations that includes Fick's law of diffusion, Ohm's law, the adsorbed water transport model proposed by Springer et al. [2], a thermal model including thermal osmosis and heat of sorption, and a database of electrochemical equations including models for multi-step reaction mechanisms for the oxygen reduction reaction and the hydrogen oxidation reaction. The software also contains a database of fuel cell materials including several catalyst layer representations such as a macro-homogeneous catalyst layer, an ionomer-filled agglomerate based catalyst layer, and a water-filled agglomerate based catalyst layer. Using openFCST, a multi-scale agglomerate model framework has been proposed to analyze any type of spherical agglomerate regardless of composition and electrochemical reactions [3]. Using this framework, different agglomerate models such as ionomer-filled [3] and water-filled [4] models can be analyzed under the same macro-scale conditions, e.g., same mass and heat transport models, in order to assess their impact on fuel cell performance and reaction distribution inside the catalyst layer. In this study, several agglomerate models are analyzed using different reaction kinetic models including the use of a cathode multi-step reaction kinetics model. Results show that, in ionomer-filled agglomerate models, the kinetic model used has the largest impact on fuel cell performance predictions, followed by the rate of oxygen dissolution. Proton transport has a negligible effect. A comparison of ionomer and water-filled agglomerate models is also presented. Using openFCST, an MEA model using the two types of agglomerate models is developed assuming a Tafel electrochemical model. Figure 1 shows the overall cell performance, the current produced inside a single agglomerate, and the macroscopic current distribution. The results show that, for a fuel cell with a conventional electrode, i.e. 10µm in thickness, even though the current produced by the agglomerates might be remarkably different (Fig. 2), the predicted cell performance, under most operating conditions, is not significantly affected by the agglomerate model. This is because of a macroscopic rearrangement of the current density as shown in Figure 3. In thin electrodes, the macroscopic rearrangement might not be possible leading to very different results. In summary, an overview of the first open-source, multi-dimensional, finite element based, polymer electrolyte fuel cell software in the literature is presented. The software can be used to analyze any type of membrane electrode assembly. In this presentation, it is used to analyze the effect of different kinetic models, boundary conditions, and agglomerate composition recently proposed in the literature. References [1] Weber, A.Z. and Newman, J. Modeling transport in polymer-electrolyte fuel cells, Chemical Reviews , 104(10):4679-4726, 2004. [2] Springer, T.E. et al. Polymer electrolyte fuel cell model, Journal of the Electrochemical Society , 138(8):2334-2342, 1991. [3] M. Moore et al., Understanding the effect of kinetic and mass transport processes in cathode agglomerates, Journal of the Electrochemical Society , 161(8), 2014. [4] Wang, Q. et al., Structure and performance of different types of agglomerates in cathode catalyst layers of PEM fuel cells, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry , 573(1):61-69, 2004.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,355
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueECS Meeting AbstractsMême sujetFuel Cells and Related MaterialsTravaux en français237 207