Quality of life improvements with Natalizumab induction therapy in patients exposed to or failing TNF-alpha inhibitor therapy in the ENCORE Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To investigate the impact of natalizumab (NAT) induction therapy on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of Crohn's disease (CD) patients who had prior exposure to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitor therapy or had failed prior TNF-alpha inhibitor therapy. NAT is a humanized antibody against alpha-4 integrin indicated for patients with active inflammation who have had an inadequate response to TNF-alpha inhibitors. NAT was studied as an induction therapy for CD in ENCORE, a 12-week, randomized, controlled trial in patients with moderate to severe CD with elevated C-reactive protein levels. HRQoL was measured using both the disease-specific Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and the Short-form 36 (SF-36), a general measure of HRQoL. For this analysis, 2 groups of patients were identified: 1) patients previously exposed to TNF-alpha inhibitor therapy (“exposed” patients), and 2) patients previously exposed to TNF-alpha inhibitor therapy who were primary efficacy failures, secondary efficacy failures, or failed due to an adverse event or intolerance (“failed” patients). Changes in HRQoL from the baseline measure to Week 12 among those treated with NAT and those treated with placebo (PBO) were compared within the exposed and failed patient groups. Patients receiving NAT (n = 127) experienced significantly greater improvements in HRQoL as measured by the IBDQ (P<0.001) and each of the 4 domains of the IBDQ (Bowel Symptoms: P<0.001, Systemic Symptoms: P<0.001, Emotional Function: P=0.001, Social Function: P=0.003) compared with patients receiving PBO (n = 109). Improvements in HRQoL as measured by the SF-36 were also evident. Specifically, NAT patients had a significantly greater increase in the Physical Component Summary score of the SF-36 (P<0.001) and significantly greater improvement on 6 of the 8 individual scales of the SF-36 (Physical Functioning: P<0.001, Bodily Pain: P<0.001, General Health: P=0.004, Vitality: P=0.004, Social Functioning: P=0.013, Mental Health: P=0.047). The HRQoL outcomes among the subset of TNF-alpha inhibitor exposed patients who were treatment failures were similar. The improvement in HRQoL measured with the IBDQ scale was significantly greater (P<0.001) for the NAT-treated patients (n = 89) compared with those receiving PBO (n = 83). The changes in each of the 4 domains of the IBDQ were also significantly greater for the NAT-treated patients (Bowel Symptoms: P<0.001, Systemic Symptoms: P<0.001, Emotional Function: P=0.002, Social Function: P=0.027). Among this TNF-alpha inhibitor failure subset, increases in the scores of both the SF-36 Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary were found to be significantly greater for the NAT patients (P=0.002 and P=0.016, respectively). Significantly greater improvements were found on each of the same 6 individual scales of the SF-36 as for the larger group of TNF-alpha inhibitor exposed patients (P value range: <0.001 to 0.036). In ENCORE, NAT-treated patients who had previously been exposed to or had “failed” TNF-alpha inhibitor therapy demonstrated significant improvements in HRQoL as measured by the IBDQ and SF-36. Importantly, HRQoL improvement was found to be independent of the reason for TNF-alpha inhibitor discontinuation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».