MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4241930045 · doi:10.1108/s2055-364120160000006031

Subject Index

2016· other· en· W4241930045 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHigher Education Practises and Engagement
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndex (typography)Subject (documents)Computer scienceWorld Wide Web

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Citation (2016), "Subject Index", Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 321-327. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120160000006031 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited INDEX Academia, 4, 8, 12, 13, 31, 47, 131, 135, 151, 152, 172, 251, 256 Academic autonomy, 94 Academic career, 7, 41, 63, 81, 153, 249 Academic cultures, 17, 94, 226, 233 Academic identity, 41, 100, 102 Academic leadership, 41, 42, 43, 46, 52, 136, 284, 298 Administrators, 4, 7, 8, 42, 46, 47, 51, 203, 245, 255, 257, 263, 298 Adult learning theory, 203 Advising as pedagogy, 16 AHA (American Historical Association), 245, 251, 254 American Indian and Alaska Natives (AI/AN), 14, 15, 129–144 Assessment, 9, 16, 115, 117, 118, 120, 137, 140, 154, 179, 181, 185, 190, 198–200, 227, 231, 249–252, 254, 255, 257, 270, 289, 290, 291, 292, 295, 296 Assimilationist, 132, 133 Attrition, 100, 130, 208, 209, 219, 226, 251 Australia, 4, 22, 23, 25, 27, 32, 33, 208, 209, 219, 260, 262, 268 Australian, 13, 16, 23, 26, 27, 29, 35, 208, 220, 221, 268, 277 Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF), 23, 208, 214 Autoethnography, 67, 71, 72, 73–74 Autonomy, 16, 154, 210, 211, 212, 213–214, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 229, 232, 233 Binational cooperation, 157 Blended delivery, 23 Bologna process, 262 Breach, 13, 65, 66, 68, 69, 75, 83 Canadian, 286, 297 Capstone, 15, 16, 34, 44, 49, 50, 52–55, 172, 173, 175, 176, 194, 249, 250, 296 Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 246 Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED), 8, 172, 174 Certificate program, 42, 292 Cohort, 16, 22, 23, 27, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 48, 54, 120, 126, 136, 137 Collaboration, 9, 12, 14, 22, 23, 25, 32, 33, 34, 43–44, 52, 54, 55, 62, 66, 95, 96, 116, 125, 137, 160, 167, 174, 175, 195, 197, 218, 231, 260, 263, 264, 267, 275, 276, 277, 278 Collaborative program planning and development, 179 Collaborative teaching and learning, 196 Commencement of Candidature, 217 Communication, 23, 34, 42, 43, 47, 53, 54, 95, 174, 177, 185, 195, 217, 273, 274, 275, 277, 292 Community, 5, 7, 8, 11, 16, 22, 24, 41, 93, 100, 105, 121, 133, 134, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 142–143, 164, 173, 175, 178, 180, 181, 183, 185, 186, 190, 191, 197, 200, 208, 212, 215, 216, 217, 218, 220, 221, 229, 234, 244, 257, 285, 287 Community of practice, 10, 11, 12, 178, 287 Competence, 16, 53, 174, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214–216, 217, 218, 219, 220 Completion, 8, 17, 33, 63, 69, 151, 152, 160, 183, 207–221, 226, 234, 241, 254, 291, 292, 294, 295, 296 Compromise, 55 Conflict, 53, 55, 137, 177, 178, 203, 229, 231, 233, 238, 239, 253 Construction of meaning, 177 Constructive conflict, 177 Coursework, 6, 11, 48, 158, 159–161, 162, 172, 177, 178, 180, 185, 195, 198, 199, 208, 209, 213, 214, 215, 217, 218, 219, 220, 244, 245, 247, 248, 249, 263 Criteria, 94, 96, 106, 107, 136, 140, 143, 183, 198, 215, 250, 284, 290, 295 Critical friends, 174 Critical pedagogy, 15, 136, 139, 140, 141, 144 Cross-disciplinary, 14, 35, 101, 102, 105, 115, 125, 297 Cultural sensitivity Culture, 11, 17, 25, 35, 45, 47, 48, 51, 93, 94, 105, 117, 130, 132, 135, 139, 140, 141, 149–167, 197, 199, 226, 227, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 236–237, 238–240, 261, 264, 275, 277, 286, 289, 295, 296 Curriculum, 16, 44, 112, 113, 115, 116, 117, 118, 120, 122, 123, 126, 131, 136, 137, 138–141, 185, 190, 191, 194–197, 199, 226, 227, 231, 232, 234, 235, 236, 237, 240, 250, 262, 283, 289 Degree awarding, 15, 93 Degree capstones, 172 Disciplinary boundaries, 14, 93, 101, 106, 118, 125 Disciplines, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 22, 27, 29, 30, 34, 40, 42, 46, 48, 49, 50, 54, 55, 66, 67, 92, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 100, 101, 103, 107, 117, 118, 124, 151, 156, 173, 246, 248, 250, 251, 265, 297, 298 Discourse, 14, 24, 93, 94, 96, 97, 98, 100, 107, 116, 117, 118, 144, 192 Dissertation in practice (DiP), 15, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 179, 180, 181, 182, 186 Distance education, 101, 122 Diversity, 6–7, 10, 48, 50, 53, 62, 64, 106, 114, 179, 203, 249 Doctor of Business Administration (DBA), 6, 16, 64, 208, 213–218, 221 Doctoral advisor, 40, 198 Doctoral candidates, 9, 11, 30, 62, 92, 106, 117, 151, 152, 157, 158, 159, 165, 175, 220, 254, 255 Doctoral program, 4, 5, 6–7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 22, 25, 32, 35, 40, 41, 112, 116, 124, 125, 131, 136, 140, 142, 143, 144, 172, 179, 186, 189–203, 208, 212, 213, 220, 221, 223, 226, 227, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 237, 239, 240, 241, 244, 250, 251, 265, 269 Doctoral relationship, 63, 67, 68, 70, 75 Doctoral supervision, 14, 61, 62, 64, 65, 74, 76, 83–87, 91–107, 159, 259–279 Doctoral Training Centers (DTCs), 26, 33 Doctoral training, 4, 7, 13, 15, 22, 24, 26, 33, 34, 150–154, 155, 161, 167, 208 Dual or double doctoral degree, 263, 278 Educational technology, 14, 91–107, 115, 116, 117, 118, 122, 123, 126, 191 Emergent research, 93 Engineering, 26, 34, 47, 66, 262, 271 Ethics, 11, 14, 50, 125, 126, 160, 161 Europe, 26, 154, 167, 261, 262 Evolving, 5, 66, 69, 72, 97, 118, 121, 215 Examination, 15, 56, 100, 152, 155, 158, 161–165, 166, 179, 185, 199, 235, 247, 268, 285, 296 Expectations, 5, 13, 27, 44, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 80–81, 84, 144, 179, 203, 217, 235, 249, 262, 267, 274, 285, 286, 288, 294, 295, 296, 297 Experiential learning, 50, 51, 52, 234 Face-to-face, 64, 71, 99, 193, 194, 195, 232, 234, 236, 261, 272, 275, 285 Faculty collaboration, 263 Faculty mentors, 4, 121, 179, 181, 186 Faculty, 47, 115–116, 141–142, 180, 196, 197, 198, 203, 231–232, 236–237, 254, 291 Faculty-student partnership, 197 Feedback, 64, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 124, 139, 190, 197, 202, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 254, 270, 289, 291, 294, 295 Financial, 50, 63, 137, 138, 143, 155, 159, 181, 203, 209, 275 Foundations, 115, 116, 117, 122, 123, 132 Fusion, 98, 106 Germany, 4, 150, 151, 152, 154, 157, 161, 164, 165, 276, 277 Global capacity building, 260, 264, 266 Goals, 15, 18, 26, 40, 42, 45, 47, 49, 50, 74, 103, 117, 172, 179, 194, 198, 209, 217, 218, 221, 231, 238, 250, 251, 262, 285, 288, 289, 291–292, 298 Golde, Chris, 246 Governance, 40, 44, 45, 50, 53, 54, 56, 232 Graduate student supervision (GSS), 281–298 Group Dynamics, 54 Higher education, 25, 33, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50–51, 52, 53, 55, 56, 62, 63–64, 66, 75, 76, 94, 114, 118, 121, 151, 181, 190, 192, 229–233, 261, 262, 283, 287, 288 Higher education context, 45, 63–64, 75, 230, 288 Higher Education reform, 227 High-leverage problem of practice, 172, 181, 182 Historical oppression, 132 Humanities, 25, 42, 48, 164, 236, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 250, 251, 252, 253, 255 Implicit, 11, 13, 62, 64, 65, 69, 75, 84 Indigenous ceremonies, 134 Indigenous education, 15, 142, 144 Indigenous pedagogy, 141 Indigenous research, 136, 140 Industry, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 44, 49, 151, 228, 256, 261 Innovation, 13, 23, 24, 25–27, 31, 35, 229 Institutional leadership, 281–298 Interaction design, 271 Interdisciplinary research, 96, 101, 102, 104, 105 Interdisciplinary, 33, 42, 50, 53, 54–55, 92, 94, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 112, 116, 117, 119, 122, 172, 177, 189–203 International research collaboration, 276 Internationalisation, 155, 160, 262 iPrep, 33 Joint degrees, 261, 262, 264, 266–268, 278 Joint doctoral degree, 263, 264, 266, 267, 269, 271–274, 276, 279 Joint doctorates, 260, 261, 263–266 Key performance indicators, 33, 34 Knowledge structures, 94, 176 Law, 28, 29, 137, 159, 250 Leaderful practice, 44 Leadership Development, 39–56, 297 Leadership theories, 43, 44, 45, 47, 237 Leadership, 5, 8, 9, 13–15, 22, 40–45, 46, 49–55, 129–144, 175, 203, 233–240, 282–284, 290–297 Learning community, 136, 138, 142–143, 175, 178, 180, 185, 186, 197, 234 Legal, 9, 47, 50, 53, 155, 159 Local rules, 163 Managerialism, 63 Marketing, 34, 143 Mathematics, 159, 246, 271 Medicine, 26, 28, 29, 134 Mental models, 176–178, 186 Mentoring, 47, 49, 50, 51–52, 113, 120–121, 124, 137, 178, 198, 282, 289, 290 Mentorship; pathways to the PhD, 48, 121, 126, 283 Methodological pluralism, 98 Midwifery, 28, 29, 30 Mixed methods, 62, 66, 75, 105, 118, 119, 126, 200, 214 MLA (Modern Language Association), 245, 251, 254 Motivation, 7, 16, 46, 123, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 217, 219, 220, 221, 265, 274, 295 Multidisciplinary, 26, 34, 282 Native leadership, 129–144 Native people, 139 The Netherlands, 262, 267, 268 New Public Management, 63 Non-Academic Career, 219 Nursing, 29, 30, 173 Obligations, 62, 64, 65, 66, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 81–83 Organizational cultures, 11, 45 Organizational skills, 54 Organizational structure, 45, 50, 53 Pedagogy, 33–35, 117, 131, 140, 246, 247, 248, 252, 254, 255, 284–285, 286, 289 Peer support, 212, 221 Performativity, 75 PhD, 23, 151–152 PhD curriculum development, 138–141 PhD curriculum in Adult Learning and Development, 190, 191–192, 194, 195, 199 PhD learning community, 142–143 PhD students, 33, 67, 70, 71, 74, 80–81, 158, 160, 250, 251, 261, 263, 264, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275–276, 277, 278 Policy, 47, 71, 75, 100, 105, 117, 118, 123, 126, 157, 268, 294 Portfolio, 46, 250, 251, 252–257 Postdisciplinary, 97 Practice, 10, 15, 45, 92–93, 140, 172–180 Practitioner-focused dissertation research, 198 Pre-doctoral Leadership Development Institute, 39–56 Problem of practice, 172, 173, 175, 176, 179, 181, 182, 183, 185 Problem-oriented knowledge, 94 Professional Development, 23, 40, 191, 235, 245, 252, 282, 287–288, 289, 290, 291, 296, 298 Professional doctorate, 28, 29, 36n6, 64, 172, 173, 175, 180, 186, 207–221, 227, 264 Professionalization training, 22 Program planning and assessment, 190–191, 198–200 Programmatic, 118 Progress review, 73, 217 Promotion and tenure, 227, 284, 285, 288, 289, 290 Psychological contract, 61–76, 81–87 Qualifying exam, 195, 198, 199, 243–257 Qualitative research, 30, 75, 119, 200 Reciprocal interdependence, 97 Reciprocal promises, 62, 83 Reflection, 43, 48, 72, 113, 116, 118, 125, 140, 177, 196, 197, 233, 238–240, 250, 254, 257, 285 Relational dialogue, 94, 107 Relationship, 24, 33, 43, 61–76, 83–87, 136, 137–138, 140, 141, 144, 151, 177, 195, 211, 212, 215, 217, 218, 221, 254, 266, 271, 277, 279, 285 Research capacity, 92 Research intensive university, 281–298 Research supervisors, 261 Researchers, 93, 96, 99, 101, 102, 103, 106, 107, 111–126, 132, 139, 140, 152, 177, 211, 216, 218, 220 Role-playing, 50, 51 Rutgers University, 39–56 Scaffold, 34, 197, 248 Scholarship of Graduate Student Supervision, 281–298 Scholarship, 22, 32, 43, 46, 66, 116, 118–119, 248, 253, 267, 268, 287, 295, 298 Science, 24, 25, 26, 42, 101, 176 Self-assessment, 214, 289 Self-Determination Theory, 207–221 Self-efficacy, 211, 215, 254 Shared discourses, 93, 100, 107 Shared mental models, 176–178, 186 Shulman, Lee, 173, 247, 252 Signature Pedagogy, 246, 247, 248, 252, 255, 285 Social justice, 125, 131, 139, 192 Social Relatedness, 210, 211–212, 213, 216, 217–218, 219, 220 Social/pastoral support, 85 Socialization, 100, 197, 212 Sovereign nations, 133, 135 Specialization, 117, 118, 190, 191, 194, 229, 230, 247 Stakeholders, 42, 44, 45, 46–48, 51, 53, 182, 184, 229, 278 STEM, 25, 265, 271 Strategic, 18, 229, 282, 287, 296, 298 Structured programmes, 152, 157 Student experience, 41, 62, 219, 220, 282 Supervision, 61, 62, 64, 69, 72, 102, 151, 152, 158, 159–161, 162, 214, 216, 218, 220, 259–279, 286 Supervisor, 62, 63–64, 65–74, 75, 81–83, 84, 86, 87, 92, 99, 100, 101–102, 105, 151, 155, 158, 159, 160, 162, 164, 166, 209, 213, 217, 218, 221, 261, 264, 265, 268, 269, 270, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 285, 286, 289 Syllabus, 253, 254 Synthesis, 96, 116, 118, 119, 120, 125, 126, 246, 292 Teacher educators, 117, 118 Technical support, 64, 70, 85, 275 Technology, 24, 26, 32, 91–107, 115, 116, 117, 118, 122, 123, 126, 191, 196, 203, 234, 251, 262, 272, 289, 297 Theoretical continuity, 92 Theoretical knowledge, 49, 51, 94, 271 Theory, 31, 33, 47, 48, 49, 52, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 111–126, 172, 192, 195, 196, 199, 203, 207–221, 235, 236 Threshold concepts, 94 Traditional leadership, 45 Training, 22, 23, 31, 32, 34, 35, 39–56, 66, 71, 75, 106, 152, 154, 159, 192, 246, 251, 254, 264 Transdisciplinary, 14, 103, 271 Transnational programmes, 149 Tribal relations, 138, 144 Unique, 40, 42, 45, 52, 66, 114–122, 125–126, 135, 136, 172, 195 United Kingdom, 26, 62, 151, 152, 161, 209 United States, 26, 41, 99, 130, 131, 132, 133, 135, 144, 151, 192, 193, 199, 212, 244, 247, 251, 252, 257, 261, 277 University collaboration, 264, 267 University mission, 50, 53, 283 Book Chapters Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education Copyright Page List of Contributors Foreword Series Editor’s Introduction Part I: Concepts and Principles Innovative Approaches in Doctoral Education: An Introduction to Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education Doctoral Education for the Future: Through the Looking Glass Scholar-in-Training; Leader-in-Training: The Rutgers University PreDoctoral Leadership Development Institute Managing the Psychological Contract within Doctoral Supervisory Relationships Part II: Successful Practices Disciplinarity Issues in Educational Technology Doctoral Supervision Living Theory in Action: Preparing a New Generation of Educational Researchers Creating a Decolonized Alliance: American Indian and Alaska Native Doctoral Leadership Program Collision and Coalescence – German and British Cultures in Doctoral Education Client-Based Dissertations in Practice Learning like Adults: A Hybrid Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program for Mid-Career Professionals Applying Self-Determination Theory to Improve Completion Rates in a Part-time Professional Doctorate Program Differentiation and Integration: Managing the Paradox in Doctoral Education Qualified … for What? The Potential for Qualifying Exams to Become Meaningful Professional Milestones Joint Doctoral Supervision across Countries: Changes, Challenges and Considerations Developing Institutional Leadership for the Scholarship of Graduate Student Supervision: Lessons Learned in a Canadian Research-Intensive University About the Authors Author Index Subject Index

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,257
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,366

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0120,014
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0140,009
Science ouverte0,0030,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,7430,759

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,381
Écart entre enseignants0,341 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetHigher Education Practises and EngagementTravaux en français237 207