MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Subject Index

2016· other· en· W4241930045 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Practises and Engagement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Subject (documents)Computer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2016), "Subject Index", Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education (Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning, Vol. 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 321-327. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120160000006031 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2016 Emerald Group Publishing Limited INDEX Academia, 4, 8, 12, 13, 31, 47, 131, 135, 151, 152, 172, 251, 256 Academic autonomy, 94 Academic career, 7, 41, 63, 81, 153, 249 Academic cultures, 17, 94, 226, 233 Academic identity, 41, 100, 102 Academic leadership, 41, 42, 43, 46, 52, 136, 284, 298 Administrators, 4, 7, 8, 42, 46, 47, 51, 203, 245, 255, 257, 263, 298 Adult learning theory, 203 Advising as pedagogy, 16 AHA (American Historical Association), 245, 251, 254 American Indian and Alaska Natives (AI/AN), 14, 15, 129–144 Assessment, 9, 16, 115, 117, 118, 120, 137, 140, 154, 179, 181, 185, 190, 198–200, 227, 231, 249–252, 254, 255, 257, 270, 289, 290, 291, 292, 295, 296 Assimilationist, 132, 133 Attrition, 100, 130, 208, 209, 219, 226, 251 Australia, 4, 22, 23, 25, 27, 32, 33, 208, 209, 219, 260, 262, 268 Australian, 13, 16, 23, 26, 27, 29, 35, 208, 220, 221, 268, 277 Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF), 23, 208, 214 Autoethnography, 67, 71, 72, 73–74 Autonomy, 16, 154, 210, 211, 212, 213–214, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 229, 232, 233 Binational cooperation, 157 Blended delivery, 23 Bologna process, 262 Breach, 13, 65, 66, 68, 69, 75, 83 Canadian, 286, 297 Capstone, 15, 16, 34, 44, 49, 50, 52–55, 172, 173, 175, 176, 194, 249, 250, 296 Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 246 Carnegie Project on the Education Doctorate (CPED), 8, 172, 174 Certificate program, 42, 292 Cohort, 16, 22, 23, 27, 30, 31, 32, 34, 35, 48, 54, 120, 126, 136, 137 Collaboration, 9, 12, 14, 22, 23, 25, 32, 33, 34, 43–44, 52, 54, 55, 62, 66, 95, 96, 116, 125, 137, 160, 167, 174, 175, 195, 197, 218, 231, 260, 263, 264, 267, 275, 276, 277, 278 Collaborative program planning and development, 179 Collaborative teaching and learning, 196 Commencement of Candidature, 217 Communication, 23, 34, 42, 43, 47, 53, 54, 95, 174, 177, 185, 195, 217, 273, 274, 275, 277, 292 Community, 5, 7, 8, 11, 16, 22, 24, 41, 93, 100, 105, 121, 133, 134, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 142–143, 164, 173, 175, 178, 180, 181, 183, 185, 186, 190, 191, 197, 200, 208, 212, 215, 216, 217, 218, 220, 221, 229, 234, 244, 257, 285, 287 Community of practice, 10, 11, 12, 178, 287 Competence, 16, 53, 174, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214–216, 217, 218, 219, 220 Completion, 8, 17, 33, 63, 69, 151, 152, 160, 183, 207–221, 226, 234, 241, 254, 291, 292, 294, 295, 296 Compromise, 55 Conflict, 53, 55, 137, 177, 178, 203, 229, 231, 233, 238, 239, 253 Construction of meaning, 177 Constructive conflict, 177 Coursework, 6, 11, 48, 158, 159–161, 162, 172, 177, 178, 180, 185, 195, 198, 199, 208, 209, 213, 214, 215, 217, 218, 219, 220, 244, 245, 247, 248, 249, 263 Criteria, 94, 96, 106, 107, 136, 140, 143, 183, 198, 215, 250, 284, 290, 295 Critical friends, 174 Critical pedagogy, 15, 136, 139, 140, 141, 144 Cross-disciplinary, 14, 35, 101, 102, 105, 115, 125, 297 Cultural sensitivity Culture, 11, 17, 25, 35, 45, 47, 48, 51, 93, 94, 105, 117, 130, 132, 135, 139, 140, 141, 149–167, 197, 199, 226, 227, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 236–237, 238–240, 261, 264, 275, 277, 286, 289, 295, 296 Curriculum, 16, 44, 112, 113, 115, 116, 117, 118, 120, 122, 123, 126, 131, 136, 137, 138–141, 185, 190, 191, 194–197, 199, 226, 227, 231, 232, 234, 235, 236, 237, 240, 250, 262, 283, 289 Degree awarding, 15, 93 Degree capstones, 172 Disciplinary boundaries, 14, 93, 101, 106, 118, 125 Disciplines, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 22, 27, 29, 30, 34, 40, 42, 46, 48, 49, 50, 54, 55, 66, 67, 92, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 100, 101, 103, 107, 117, 118, 124, 151, 156, 173, 246, 248, 250, 251, 265, 297, 298 Discourse, 14, 24, 93, 94, 96, 97, 98, 100, 107, 116, 117, 118, 144, 192 Dissertation in practice (DiP), 15, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 179, 180, 181, 182, 186 Distance education, 101, 122 Diversity, 6–7, 10, 48, 50, 53, 62, 64, 106, 114, 179, 203, 249 Doctor of Business Administration (DBA), 6, 16, 64, 208, 213–218, 221 Doctoral advisor, 40, 198 Doctoral candidates, 9, 11, 30, 62, 92, 106, 117, 151, 152, 157, 158, 159, 165, 175, 220, 254, 255 Doctoral program, 4, 5, 6–7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 22, 25, 32, 35, 40, 41, 112, 116, 124, 125, 131, 136, 140, 142, 143, 144, 172, 179, 186, 189–203, 208, 212, 213, 220, 221, 223, 226, 227, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 237, 239, 240, 241, 244, 250, 251, 265, 269 Doctoral relationship, 63, 67, 68, 70, 75 Doctoral supervision, 14, 61, 62, 64, 65, 74, 76, 83–87, 91–107, 159, 259–279 Doctoral Training Centers (DTCs), 26, 33 Doctoral training, 4, 7, 13, 15, 22, 24, 26, 33, 34, 150–154, 155, 161, 167, 208 Dual or double doctoral degree, 263, 278 Educational technology, 14, 91–107, 115, 116, 117, 118, 122, 123, 126, 191 Emergent research, 93 Engineering, 26, 34, 47, 66, 262, 271 Ethics, 11, 14, 50, 125, 126, 160, 161 Europe, 26, 154, 167, 261, 262 Evolving, 5, 66, 69, 72, 97, 118, 121, 215 Examination, 15, 56, 100, 152, 155, 158, 161–165, 166, 179, 185, 199, 235, 247, 268, 285, 296 Expectations, 5, 13, 27, 44, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 80–81, 84, 144, 179, 203, 217, 235, 249, 262, 267, 274, 285, 286, 288, 294, 295, 296, 297 Experiential learning, 50, 51, 52, 234 Face-to-face, 64, 71, 99, 193, 194, 195, 232, 234, 236, 261, 272, 275, 285 Faculty collaboration, 263 Faculty mentors, 4, 121, 179, 181, 186 Faculty, 47, 115–116, 141–142, 180, 196, 197, 198, 203, 231–232, 236–237, 254, 291 Faculty-student partnership, 197 Feedback, 64, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 124, 139, 190, 197, 202, 211, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 254, 270, 289, 291, 294, 295 Financial, 50, 63, 137, 138, 143, 155, 159, 181, 203, 209, 275 Foundations, 115, 116, 117, 122, 123, 132 Fusion, 98, 106 Germany, 4, 150, 151, 152, 154, 157, 161, 164, 165, 276, 277 Global capacity building, 260, 264, 266 Goals, 15, 18, 26, 40, 42, 45, 47, 49, 50, 74, 103, 117, 172, 179, 194, 198, 209, 217, 218, 221, 231, 238, 250, 251, 262, 285, 288, 289, 291–292, 298 Golde, Chris, 246 Governance, 40, 44, 45, 50, 53, 54, 56, 232 Graduate student supervision (GSS), 281–298 Group Dynamics, 54 Higher education, 25, 33, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50–51, 52, 53, 55, 56, 62, 63–64, 66, 75, 76, 94, 114, 118, 121, 151, 181, 190, 192, 229–233, 261, 262, 283, 287, 288 Higher education context, 45, 63–64, 75, 230, 288 Higher Education reform, 227 High-leverage problem of practice, 172, 181, 182 Historical oppression, 132 Humanities, 25, 42, 48, 164, 236, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 250, 251, 252, 253, 255 Implicit, 11, 13, 62, 64, 65, 69, 75, 84 Indigenous ceremonies, 134 Indigenous education, 15, 142, 144 Indigenous pedagogy, 141 Indigenous research, 136, 140 Industry, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 44, 49, 151, 228, 256, 261 Innovation, 13, 23, 24, 25–27, 31, 35, 229 Institutional leadership, 281–298 Interaction design, 271 Interdisciplinary research, 96, 101, 102, 104, 105 Interdisciplinary, 33, 42, 50, 53, 54–55, 92, 94, 95, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 112, 116, 117, 119, 122, 172, 177, 189–203 International research collaboration, 276 Internationalisation, 155, 160, 262 iPrep, 33 Joint degrees, 261, 262, 264, 266–268, 278 Joint doctoral degree, 263, 264, 266, 267, 269, 271–274, 276, 279 Joint doctorates, 260, 261, 263–266 Key performance indicators, 33, 34 Knowledge structures, 94, 176 Law, 28, 29, 137, 159, 250 Leaderful practice, 44 Leadership Development, 39–56, 297 Leadership theories, 43, 44, 45, 47, 237 Leadership, 5, 8, 9, 13–15, 22, 40–45, 46, 49–55, 129–144, 175, 203, 233–240, 282–284, 290–297 Learning community, 136, 138, 142–143, 175, 178, 180, 185, 186, 197, 234 Legal, 9, 47, 50, 53, 155, 159 Local rules, 163 Managerialism, 63 Marketing, 34, 143 Mathematics, 159, 246, 271 Medicine, 26, 28, 29, 134 Mental models, 176–178, 186 Mentoring, 47, 49, 50, 51–52, 113, 120–121, 124, 137, 178, 198, 282, 289, 290 Mentorship; pathways to the PhD, 48, 121, 126, 283 Methodological pluralism, 98 Midwifery, 28, 29, 30 Mixed methods, 62, 66, 75, 105, 118, 119, 126, 200, 214 MLA (Modern Language Association), 245, 251, 254 Motivation, 7, 16, 46, 123, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 217, 219, 220, 221, 265, 274, 295 Multidisciplinary, 26, 34, 282 Native leadership, 129–144 Native people, 139 The Netherlands, 262, 267, 268 New Public Management, 63 Non-Academic Career, 219 Nursing, 29, 30, 173 Obligations, 62, 64, 65, 66, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 81–83 Organizational cultures, 11, 45 Organizational skills, 54 Organizational structure, 45, 50, 53 Pedagogy, 33–35, 117, 131, 140, 246, 247, 248, 252, 254, 255, 284–285, 286, 289 Peer support, 212, 221 Performativity, 75 PhD, 23, 151–152 PhD curriculum development, 138–141 PhD curriculum in Adult Learning and Development, 190, 191–192, 194, 195, 199 PhD learning community, 142–143 PhD students, 33, 67, 70, 71, 74, 80–81, 158, 160, 250, 251, 261, 263, 264, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275–276, 277, 278 Policy, 47, 71, 75, 100, 105, 117, 118, 123, 126, 157, 268, 294 Portfolio, 46, 250, 251, 252–257 Postdisciplinary, 97 Practice, 10, 15, 45, 92–93, 140, 172–180 Practitioner-focused dissertation research, 198 Pre-doctoral Leadership Development Institute, 39–56 Problem of practice, 172, 173, 175, 176, 179, 181, 182, 183, 185 Problem-oriented knowledge, 94 Professional Development, 23, 40, 191, 235, 245, 252, 282, 287–288, 289, 290, 291, 296, 298 Professional doctorate, 28, 29, 36n6, 64, 172, 173, 175, 180, 186, 207–221, 227, 264 Professionalization training, 22 Program planning and assessment, 190–191, 198–200 Programmatic, 118 Progress review, 73, 217 Promotion and tenure, 227, 284, 285, 288, 289, 290 Psychological contract, 61–76, 81–87 Qualifying exam, 195, 198, 199, 243–257 Qualitative research, 30, 75, 119, 200 Reciprocal interdependence, 97 Reciprocal promises, 62, 83 Reflection, 43, 48, 72, 113, 116, 118, 125, 140, 177, 196, 197, 233, 238–240, 250, 254, 257, 285 Relational dialogue, 94, 107 Relationship, 24, 33, 43, 61–76, 83–87, 136, 137–138, 140, 141, 144, 151, 177, 195, 211, 212, 215, 217, 218, 221, 254, 266, 271, 277, 279, 285 Research capacity, 92 Research intensive university, 281–298 Research supervisors, 261 Researchers, 93, 96, 99, 101, 102, 103, 106, 107, 111–126, 132, 139, 140, 152, 177, 211, 216, 218, 220 Role-playing, 50, 51 Rutgers University, 39–56 Scaffold, 34, 197, 248 Scholarship of Graduate Student Supervision, 281–298 Scholarship, 22, 32, 43, 46, 66, 116, 118–119, 248, 253, 267, 268, 287, 295, 298 Science, 24, 25, 26, 42, 101, 176 Self-assessment, 214, 289 Self-Determination Theory, 207–221 Self-efficacy, 211, 215, 254 Shared discourses, 93, 100, 107 Shared mental models, 176–178, 186 Shulman, Lee, 173, 247, 252 Signature Pedagogy, 246, 247, 248, 252, 255, 285 Social justice, 125, 131, 139, 192 Social Relatedness, 210, 211–212, 213, 216, 217–218, 219, 220 Social/pastoral support, 85 Socialization, 100, 197, 212 Sovereign nations, 133, 135 Specialization, 117, 118, 190, 191, 194, 229, 230, 247 Stakeholders, 42, 44, 45, 46–48, 51, 53, 182, 184, 229, 278 STEM, 25, 265, 271 Strategic, 18, 229, 282, 287, 296, 298 Structured programmes, 152, 157 Student experience, 41, 62, 219, 220, 282 Supervision, 61, 62, 64, 69, 72, 102, 151, 152, 158, 159–161, 162, 214, 216, 218, 220, 259–279, 286 Supervisor, 62, 63–64, 65–74, 75, 81–83, 84, 86, 87, 92, 99, 100, 101–102, 105, 151, 155, 158, 159, 160, 162, 164, 166, 209, 213, 217, 218, 221, 261, 264, 265, 268, 269, 270, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 285, 286, 289 Syllabus, 253, 254 Synthesis, 96, 116, 118, 119, 120, 125, 126, 246, 292 Teacher educators, 117, 118 Technical support, 64, 70, 85, 275 Technology, 24, 26, 32, 91–107, 115, 116, 117, 118, 122, 123, 126, 191, 196, 203, 234, 251, 262, 272, 289, 297 Theoretical continuity, 92 Theoretical knowledge, 49, 51, 94, 271 Theory, 31, 33, 47, 48, 49, 52, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 111–126, 172, 192, 195, 196, 199, 203, 207–221, 235, 236 Threshold concepts, 94 Traditional leadership, 45 Training, 22, 23, 31, 32, 34, 35, 39–56, 66, 71, 75, 106, 152, 154, 159, 192, 246, 251, 254, 264 Transdisciplinary, 14, 103, 271 Transnational programmes, 149 Tribal relations, 138, 144 Unique, 40, 42, 45, 52, 66, 114–122, 125–126, 135, 136, 172, 195 United Kingdom, 26, 62, 151, 152, 161, 209 United States, 26, 41, 99, 130, 131, 132, 133, 135, 144, 151, 192, 193, 199, 212, 244, 247, 251, 252, 257, 261, 277 University collaboration, 264, 267 University mission, 50, 53, 283 Book Chapters Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education Innovations in Higher Education Teaching and Learning Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education Copyright Page List of Contributors Foreword Series Editor’s Introduction Part I: Concepts and Principles Innovative Approaches in Doctoral Education: An Introduction to Emerging Directions in Doctoral Education Doctoral Education for the Future: Through the Looking Glass Scholar-in-Training; Leader-in-Training: The Rutgers University PreDoctoral Leadership Development Institute Managing the Psychological Contract within Doctoral Supervisory Relationships Part II: Successful Practices Disciplinarity Issues in Educational Technology Doctoral Supervision Living Theory in Action: Preparing a New Generation of Educational Researchers Creating a Decolonized Alliance: American Indian and Alaska Native Doctoral Leadership Program Collision and Coalescence – German and British Cultures in Doctoral Education Client-Based Dissertations in Practice Learning like Adults: A Hybrid Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program for Mid-Career Professionals Applying Self-Determination Theory to Improve Completion Rates in a Part-time Professional Doctorate Program Differentiation and Integration: Managing the Paradox in Doctoral Education Qualified … for What? The Potential for Qualifying Exams to Become Meaningful Professional Milestones Joint Doctoral Supervision across Countries: Changes, Challenges and Considerations Developing Institutional Leadership for the Scholarship of Graduate Student Supervision: Lessons Learned in a Canadian Research-Intensive University About the Authors Author Index Subject Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0120.014
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0140.009
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7430.759

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigher Education Practises and EngagementFrench-language works237,207