Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As I write this, the UN's Annual Climate Conference is beginning in Durban, South Africa, a year or so before the main provisions of the 1997 Kyoto protocol expire. This was the world's only comprehensive treaty obliging countries to cut their emissions. Recently, the question of global warming has become viewed with some skepticism, particularly in the United States, and there is considerable discussion about whether a legally binding climate treaty is necessary. Scientists, politicians, and industry are hotly debating issues related to the effects of global warming on the environment and the effects on industry of efforts to control this. In this issue, we publish two papers discussing the environmental impact of health care. The first is by John Agar from Australia, discussing what he sees as the astonishing environmental effects of dialysis worldwide and the pressing need to begin to address developing sustainable dialysis practices worldwide. The second, a paper from the UK Department of Health in London, discusses sustainability in the delivery of health care, both in nephrology and in medical care more generally, and the effects of health care on the environment. I hope you will find these interesting. While reviewing these articles I came across the Centre for Sustainable Healthcare (formerly known as the Campaign for Greener Healthcare) at http://sustainablehealthcare.org.uk/. This is an independent UK organization that is working with key partners to engage health care professionals, patients, and the wider community in understanding the connections between health and environment and the importance of adopting sustainable practices at work and at home. It quotes reports that the National Health Service is one of the biggest carbon polluters in the United Kingdom being responsible for 21 million tons of CO2 each year – representing 25% of all public sector carbon emissions in England. The site also includes a presentation from the Cost Saving Strategies in Renal Medicine Conference held in the UK on 1 December 2011 – http://sustainablehealthcare.org.uk/green-nephrology/resources/2011/12/green-nephrology-save-carbon-save-money-slides. There is already an active Green Nephrology Network in the United Kingdom. If you enjoy the current articles the websites are worth a visit. In this issue, there is also an account of the origins of the first freestanding not-for-profit hemodialysis unit in the world, the Seattle Artificial Kidney Center that opened 50 years ago in January 1962. The International Society for Hemodialysis is pleased to present its 2012 ISHD Belding H. Scribner Trailblazer Award in Hemodialysis to Lee Henderson, MD on February 25, 2012 during the Annual Dialysis Conference to be held in San Antonio, Texas, USA (for more information, please visit “ishd.net”). Also, please note the advertisements in this issue for the 2012 International Vicenza Course on Peritoneal Dialysis to be held in the Congress Center Fiera, in Vicenza, Italy. June 12t–15 – http://www.vicenzanephrocourses.com and for the ISHD 2012 Meeting to be held in the Grand Hotel in Taipei, Taiwan, August 3 to 5 http://www.ishd2012.org. Note again that in 2012, individual subscriptions to the journal not associated with ISHD membership will be discontinued, and subscriptions will be to the journal through the society membership at a reduced cost and added member services. To learn more about the ISHD, go to http://www.ishd,net and click on “Join ISHD now” for current member subscription information and rates. Christopher R. Blagg Editor-in-Chief
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,449 | 0,364 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».