MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4242206914 · doi:10.5403/oregonhistq.111.2.260

Review Brian Booth Glen A. Love Davis Country: H.L. Davis's Northwest Oregon State University Press , Corvallis , 2009 . Photographs, bibliography. 320 pages. $$22.95 paper.

2010· article· en· W4242206914 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArchaeology and Natural History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousState (computer science)JurisdictionContext (archaeology)ScholarshipFish <Actinopterygii>FishingHistoryArt historyGeographyLawArchaeologyPolitical scienceFisheryEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

 OHQ vol. 111, no. 2 cannery operators on the Nass River, outside state jurisdiction. Landing Native Fisheries is a deeply researched and engaging text that places British Columbia’s history into a larger imperial legal context and would be of interest to legal scholars and practitioners, historians, Indigenous communities, and fishers on both sides of the Canada-U.S. border. Harris brings to light the regulatory regimes developed during the period of state formation and consolidation that wrested control of the fisheries from Indigenous peoples and undermined a highly successful fish-based economy. At the same time,his examination of the province’s“reserve geography” points to the implicit recognition by the early state of the importance of fisheries to Indigenous economies and of theAboriginal righttofish.LandingNativeFisheries bringsfish and water to the forefront of a scholarship that has emphasized the dispossession of land and territory. As the spokesperson for the Allied Tribes of British Columbia Peter Kelly stated in 1923, “The fishing question . . . is a burning one” (p. 183). Susan Roy University of British Columbia Davis Country: H.L. Davis’s Northwest edited by Brian Booth and Glen A. Love Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, 2009. Photographs, bibliography. 320 pages. $22.95 paper. Ask Oregon readers which Oregon writer won a Pulitzer Prize. After guessing Ken Kesey or Ursula LeGuin, they often give up. Few northwesterners know of H.L.Davis and his Pulitzer Prize–winning novel Honey in the Horn (1935). Even some librarians in Davis’s home regions of Roseburg and The Dalles fail to recognize him.And to everyone’s loss,nearly all his work is out of print. But the volume under review, a superb Davis sampler, could reignite interest in this front-rank Oregon, Pacific Northwest, western writer. How satisfying if this valuable collection would become an“Everyone Reads” selection to return Davis to regional readers. Brian Booth and Glen A.Love are ideal editors for Davis Country: H.L. Davis’s Northwest. Booth, a book lover nonpareil and founder of the Oregon Institute of Literary Arts, hails from Douglas County, Davis’s natal home. Love is a leading authority on Pacific Northwest literature, with previous work on Davis and Don Berry and pathbreaking essays on eco-criticism, the study of literary-ecological connections, among his scholarly credits. Booth and Love bring together here a top-shelf gathering of Davis’s works. After a brief volume introduction, they include a short autobiographical piece and comments on Davis by two friends. The next section, the most important and extensive section of the anthology, gathers the three opening chapters of Honey in the Horn and ten of Davis’s essays and short stories. Next are nine of Davis’s poems and nine of his lively letters to literary friends and a relative. Closing out the volume are one superlative chapter from Davis’s Winds of Morning (1952), excerpts from and comments by coeditor Love on Davis’s final, unpublished novel Exit, Pursued by a Bear, a brief Davis bibliography, and abbreviated editorial comments.Each of the major sections carries a short, very helpful biographicalthematic introduction. For historians, H.L. Davis misleads as well as aids understanding of the Northwest past. First, his focus was very narrow — mainly the Oregon outback he knew firsthand in the Roseburg-Oakland and The Dalles–eastern Oregon subregions.One would not know from Davis’s writings that Oregon and Washington were half urban by the late 1930s. Rural life on farms, ranches, and isolated hamlets and the lives of sheepherders and horse wranglers dominate his fiction and essays. Only a few scattered references deal with a majority of  Reviews northwesterners in towns and cities of more than 2,500. Conversely,Davis is a first-rate specimen for understanding the literary history of the Pacific Northwest. Along with authors James Stevens and Vardis Fisher and editor H.G. Merriam, Davis was a major current in the flood of literary regionalism that washed across the region in the 1920s and 1930s. Davis broke clearly and contentiously from the suffocating romanticism that held in thrall writers like Frederic Homer Balch in his novel Bridge of the Gods (1890) and other writers and teachers. Davis and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,148
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,223 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle