MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242206914 · doi:10.5403/oregonhistq.111.2.260

Review Brian Booth Glen A. Love Davis Country: H.L. Davis's Northwest Oregon State University Press , Corvallis , 2009 . Photographs, bibliography. 320 pages. $$22.95 paper.

2010· article· en· W4242206914 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousState (computer science)JurisdictionContext (archaeology)ScholarshipFish <Actinopterygii>FishingHistoryArt historyGeographyLawArchaeologyPolitical scienceFisheryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

 OHQ vol. 111, no. 2 cannery operators on the Nass River, outside state jurisdiction. Landing Native Fisheries is a deeply researched and engaging text that places British Columbia’s history into a larger imperial legal context and would be of interest to legal scholars and practitioners, historians, Indigenous communities, and fishers on both sides of the Canada-U.S. border. Harris brings to light the regulatory regimes developed during the period of state formation and consolidation that wrested control of the fisheries from Indigenous peoples and undermined a highly successful fish-based economy. At the same time,his examination of the province’s“reserve geography” points to the implicit recognition by the early state of the importance of fisheries to Indigenous economies and of theAboriginal righttofish.LandingNativeFisheries bringsfish and water to the forefront of a scholarship that has emphasized the dispossession of land and territory. As the spokesperson for the Allied Tribes of British Columbia Peter Kelly stated in 1923, “The fishing question . . . is a burning one” (p. 183). Susan Roy University of British Columbia Davis Country: H.L. Davis’s Northwest edited by Brian Booth and Glen A. Love Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, 2009. Photographs, bibliography. 320 pages. $22.95 paper. Ask Oregon readers which Oregon writer won a Pulitzer Prize. After guessing Ken Kesey or Ursula LeGuin, they often give up. Few northwesterners know of H.L.Davis and his Pulitzer Prize–winning novel Honey in the Horn (1935). Even some librarians in Davis’s home regions of Roseburg and The Dalles fail to recognize him.And to everyone’s loss,nearly all his work is out of print. But the volume under review, a superb Davis sampler, could reignite interest in this front-rank Oregon, Pacific Northwest, western writer. How satisfying if this valuable collection would become an“Everyone Reads” selection to return Davis to regional readers. Brian Booth and Glen A.Love are ideal editors for Davis Country: H.L. Davis’s Northwest. Booth, a book lover nonpareil and founder of the Oregon Institute of Literary Arts, hails from Douglas County, Davis’s natal home. Love is a leading authority on Pacific Northwest literature, with previous work on Davis and Don Berry and pathbreaking essays on eco-criticism, the study of literary-ecological connections, among his scholarly credits. Booth and Love bring together here a top-shelf gathering of Davis’s works. After a brief volume introduction, they include a short autobiographical piece and comments on Davis by two friends. The next section, the most important and extensive section of the anthology, gathers the three opening chapters of Honey in the Horn and ten of Davis’s essays and short stories. Next are nine of Davis’s poems and nine of his lively letters to literary friends and a relative. Closing out the volume are one superlative chapter from Davis’s Winds of Morning (1952), excerpts from and comments by coeditor Love on Davis’s final, unpublished novel Exit, Pursued by a Bear, a brief Davis bibliography, and abbreviated editorial comments.Each of the major sections carries a short, very helpful biographicalthematic introduction. For historians, H.L. Davis misleads as well as aids understanding of the Northwest past. First, his focus was very narrow — mainly the Oregon outback he knew firsthand in the Roseburg-Oakland and The Dalles–eastern Oregon subregions.One would not know from Davis’s writings that Oregon and Washington were half urban by the late 1930s. Rural life on farms, ranches, and isolated hamlets and the lives of sheepherders and horse wranglers dominate his fiction and essays. Only a few scattered references deal with a majority of  Reviews northwesterners in towns and cities of more than 2,500. Conversely,Davis is a first-rate specimen for understanding the literary history of the Pacific Northwest. Along with authors James Stevens and Vardis Fisher and editor H.G. Merriam, Davis was a major current in the flood of literary regionalism that washed across the region in the 1920s and 1930s. Davis broke clearly and contentiously from the suffocating romanticism that held in thrall writers like Frederic Homer Balch in his novel Bridge of the Gods (1890) and other writers and teachers. Davis and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it