MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242206914 · doi:10.5403/oregonhistq.111.2.260

Review Brian Booth Glen A. Love Davis Country: H.L. Davis's Northwest Oregon State University Press , Corvallis , 2009 . Photographs, bibliography. 320 pages. $$22.95 paper.

2010· article· en· W4242206914 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOregon Historical Quarterly · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Natural History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousState (computer science)JurisdictionContext (archaeology)ScholarshipFish <Actinopterygii>FishingHistoryArt historyGeographyLawArchaeologyPolitical scienceFisheryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

 OHQ vol. 111, no. 2 cannery operators on the Nass River, outside state jurisdiction. Landing Native Fisheries is a deeply researched and engaging text that places British Columbia’s history into a larger imperial legal context and would be of interest to legal scholars and practitioners, historians, Indigenous communities, and fishers on both sides of the Canada-U.S. border. Harris brings to light the regulatory regimes developed during the period of state formation and consolidation that wrested control of the fisheries from Indigenous peoples and undermined a highly successful fish-based economy. At the same time,his examination of the province’s“reserve geography” points to the implicit recognition by the early state of the importance of fisheries to Indigenous economies and of theAboriginal righttofish.LandingNativeFisheries bringsfish and water to the forefront of a scholarship that has emphasized the dispossession of land and territory. As the spokesperson for the Allied Tribes of British Columbia Peter Kelly stated in 1923, “The fishing question . . . is a burning one” (p. 183). Susan Roy University of British Columbia Davis Country: H.L. Davis’s Northwest edited by Brian Booth and Glen A. Love Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, 2009. Photographs, bibliography. 320 pages. $22.95 paper. Ask Oregon readers which Oregon writer won a Pulitzer Prize. After guessing Ken Kesey or Ursula LeGuin, they often give up. Few northwesterners know of H.L.Davis and his Pulitzer Prize–winning novel Honey in the Horn (1935). Even some librarians in Davis’s home regions of Roseburg and The Dalles fail to recognize him.And to everyone’s loss,nearly all his work is out of print. But the volume under review, a superb Davis sampler, could reignite interest in this front-rank Oregon, Pacific Northwest, western writer. How satisfying if this valuable collection would become an“Everyone Reads” selection to return Davis to regional readers. Brian Booth and Glen A.Love are ideal editors for Davis Country: H.L. Davis’s Northwest. Booth, a book lover nonpareil and founder of the Oregon Institute of Literary Arts, hails from Douglas County, Davis’s natal home. Love is a leading authority on Pacific Northwest literature, with previous work on Davis and Don Berry and pathbreaking essays on eco-criticism, the study of literary-ecological connections, among his scholarly credits. Booth and Love bring together here a top-shelf gathering of Davis’s works. After a brief volume introduction, they include a short autobiographical piece and comments on Davis by two friends. The next section, the most important and extensive section of the anthology, gathers the three opening chapters of Honey in the Horn and ten of Davis’s essays and short stories. Next are nine of Davis’s poems and nine of his lively letters to literary friends and a relative. Closing out the volume are one superlative chapter from Davis’s Winds of Morning (1952), excerpts from and comments by coeditor Love on Davis’s final, unpublished novel Exit, Pursued by a Bear, a brief Davis bibliography, and abbreviated editorial comments.Each of the major sections carries a short, very helpful biographicalthematic introduction. For historians, H.L. Davis misleads as well as aids understanding of the Northwest past. First, his focus was very narrow — mainly the Oregon outback he knew firsthand in the Roseburg-Oakland and The Dalles–eastern Oregon subregions.One would not know from Davis’s writings that Oregon and Washington were half urban by the late 1930s. Rural life on farms, ranches, and isolated hamlets and the lives of sheepherders and horse wranglers dominate his fiction and essays. Only a few scattered references deal with a majority of  Reviews northwesterners in towns and cities of more than 2,500. Conversely,Davis is a first-rate specimen for understanding the literary history of the Pacific Northwest. Along with authors James Stevens and Vardis Fisher and editor H.G. Merriam, Davis was a major current in the flood of literary regionalism that washed across the region in the 1920s and 1930s. Davis broke clearly and contentiously from the suffocating romanticism that held in thrall writers like Frederic Homer Balch in his novel Bridge of the Gods (1890) and other writers and teachers. Davis and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0610.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOregon Historical QuarterlySame topicArchaeology and Natural HistoryFrench-language works237,207