MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4242277629 · doi:10.1353/nin.2006.0048

Scapegoats: Baseballers Whose Careers Are Marked by One Fateful Play (review)

2006· article· en· W4242277629 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
James E. Martin

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLeagueHistoryArt historyClassicsLawLiteratureArtPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Scapegoats: Baseballers Whose Careers Are Marked by One Fateful Play James E. Martin (bio) Christopher Bell. Scapegoats: Baseballers Whose Careers Are Marked by One Fateful Play. Jefferson NC: McFarland, 2002. 182 pp. Paper, $24.95. Acknowledging that the long history of baseball contains any number of candidates suitable for inclusion in this book, the author has nevertheless come up with a list of nine players he believes meet the highest standards for fateful plays. Readers with more than passing familiarity with baseball lore will recognize the usual suspects. From Fred Merkle of the 1908 Giants, marked forever by his failure to tag second base on a winning hit, to Mitch Williams of the Phillies, whose home run toss to Toronto's Joe Carter ended the 1993 World Series, the author explores how nine selected players became marked for life as baseball's scapegoats by the media and fans. Merkle is twice marked as he teamed with Fred Snodgrass to error a fly ball in the 1912 World Series that led to the Giants' loss to Boston. Catcher Mickey Owens' passed ball that sent the Dodgers to defeat against the Yankees in game four of the 1941 Series, Ralph Branca's home run pitch to Bobby Thompson in the final inning of the Dodgers–Giants playoff game for the 1951 National League pennant, and Red Sox Bill Buckner's infamous lost grounder in 1986 also make the cut, as one would expect, given the stakes at the time. With these and some less notable scapegoats, the author analyzes details of the moment and the play itself, including the events leading to each player's unfortunate downfall. Bell also looks at media coverage and attitudes toward these players over some eighty-five years, noting that while miscues were recorded on film during earlier days as now, players were chastised for their miscues only in the press and quickly forgotten. Today, the filmed misdeeds of players are replayed and analyzed over and over, forever ensuring that the perpetrators will not be forgotten or forgiven. While the author details the respective failings of his chosen gang of nine, [End Page 122] he goes to great length to offset the new public reality by identifying mitigating circumstances. In each case, the highlighted misdeed alone did not lose a game or Series, but it was more of a team effort. For example, had another player not committed an error, walked or hit a batter, or given up a home run to extend an inning or the game, all would have been different and those players marked as scapegoats would never have been immortalized. The author also follows each player's later career and discusses the effect public scorn, media cat-calls, and anonymous threats of violence for one play had on their lives long after they left the game. But, with the exception of the knowledgeable baseball fan who can objectively place such incidents within the context of the entire game, the majority of fans focus only on that one fatal play and accept its magnitude based on the interpretation by an unforgiving media. In the end, a scapegoat is identified, and it is his fate to be the one left standing when the music stops and the outcome of the game is only a statistic in the baseball encyclopedia. This book is quite suitable for those with a solid interest in baseball history as it spans most of the twentieth century and includes little known facts and events about teams, owners, and teammates of these fall guys that a casual reader may find tedious. Interestingly, the book's cover probably exacerbates the very issue of scapegoatism that Bell tries to defuse. The cover shows a photo, or more precisely a mug shot, of Bill Buckner with the word "Scapegoats" prominent above his head and a black name plate across his chest displaying the book's remaining title, all reminiscent of a wanted poster in the local post office. But despite the cover, after reading this book and learning of the forgiving circumstances surrounding the dark moments for each of the unlucky nine, one can only conclude that a more suitable title for Bell...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,132
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,869

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1320,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,187
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetAmerican Sports and LiteratureTravaux en français237 207