MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242277629 · doi:10.1353/nin.2006.0048

Scapegoats: Baseballers Whose Careers Are Marked by One Fateful Play (review)

2006· article· en· W4242277629 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
James E. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueHistoryArt historyClassicsLawLiteratureArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Scapegoats: Baseballers Whose Careers Are Marked by One Fateful Play James E. Martin (bio) Christopher Bell. Scapegoats: Baseballers Whose Careers Are Marked by One Fateful Play. Jefferson NC: McFarland, 2002. 182 pp. Paper, $24.95. Acknowledging that the long history of baseball contains any number of candidates suitable for inclusion in this book, the author has nevertheless come up with a list of nine players he believes meet the highest standards for fateful plays. Readers with more than passing familiarity with baseball lore will recognize the usual suspects. From Fred Merkle of the 1908 Giants, marked forever by his failure to tag second base on a winning hit, to Mitch Williams of the Phillies, whose home run toss to Toronto's Joe Carter ended the 1993 World Series, the author explores how nine selected players became marked for life as baseball's scapegoats by the media and fans. Merkle is twice marked as he teamed with Fred Snodgrass to error a fly ball in the 1912 World Series that led to the Giants' loss to Boston. Catcher Mickey Owens' passed ball that sent the Dodgers to defeat against the Yankees in game four of the 1941 Series, Ralph Branca's home run pitch to Bobby Thompson in the final inning of the Dodgers–Giants playoff game for the 1951 National League pennant, and Red Sox Bill Buckner's infamous lost grounder in 1986 also make the cut, as one would expect, given the stakes at the time. With these and some less notable scapegoats, the author analyzes details of the moment and the play itself, including the events leading to each player's unfortunate downfall. Bell also looks at media coverage and attitudes toward these players over some eighty-five years, noting that while miscues were recorded on film during earlier days as now, players were chastised for their miscues only in the press and quickly forgotten. Today, the filmed misdeeds of players are replayed and analyzed over and over, forever ensuring that the perpetrators will not be forgotten or forgiven. While the author details the respective failings of his chosen gang of nine, [End Page 122] he goes to great length to offset the new public reality by identifying mitigating circumstances. In each case, the highlighted misdeed alone did not lose a game or Series, but it was more of a team effort. For example, had another player not committed an error, walked or hit a batter, or given up a home run to extend an inning or the game, all would have been different and those players marked as scapegoats would never have been immortalized. The author also follows each player's later career and discusses the effect public scorn, media cat-calls, and anonymous threats of violence for one play had on their lives long after they left the game. But, with the exception of the knowledgeable baseball fan who can objectively place such incidents within the context of the entire game, the majority of fans focus only on that one fatal play and accept its magnitude based on the interpretation by an unforgiving media. In the end, a scapegoat is identified, and it is his fate to be the one left standing when the music stops and the outcome of the game is only a statistic in the baseball encyclopedia. This book is quite suitable for those with a solid interest in baseball history as it spans most of the twentieth century and includes little known facts and events about teams, owners, and teammates of these fall guys that a casual reader may find tedious. Interestingly, the book's cover probably exacerbates the very issue of scapegoatism that Bell tries to defuse. The cover shows a photo, or more precisely a mug shot, of Bill Buckner with the word "Scapegoats" prominent above his head and a black name plate across his chest displaying the book's remaining title, all reminiscent of a wanted poster in the local post office. But despite the cover, after reading this book and learning of the forgiving circumstances surrounding the dark moments for each of the unlucky nine, one can only conclude that a more suitable title for Bell...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1320.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207