MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4242347424 · doi:10.5858/135.2.171

Pathology Against the Odds

2011· article· en· W4242347424 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Hallgrímur Benediktsson

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHistory of Medical Practice
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPathologyMedicineOddsInternal medicineLogistic regression

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In this issue of Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, a special section is devoted to the theme of pathology services in resource-poor nations. It is largely based on a symposium held at the annual meeting of the Canadian Association of Pathologists in Ottawa in July 2008, with additional contributions from other pathologists who actively provide voluntary services in developing countries.Although pathology and laboratory medicine play a crucial and central role in the modern practice of medicine, most of the globe's population do not have access to medical services with a sound basis in laboratory diagnosis. The reasons for this are, for the most part, readily evident—a lack of resources means that expensive equipment, appropriate physical facilities, and trained personnel is simply beyond the reach of many countries in what is sometimes referred to as the “developing world.” This lack of the necessary tools of our trade may frequently be compounded by cultural or political issues as well as geographical and climatologic challenges. As a result, the practice of pathology in many countries poses unfamiliar and at times difficult problems for pathologists trained in resource-rich environments. The availability of laboratory procedures is often limited, and quality control may be lacking for the ones that exist. And where the practice of medicine has been getting by without the benefit of pathology, it may be difficult to change this pattern.Pathologists who are interested in contributing to global health may find it difficult to become involved in a suitable project. Pathologists Overseas, as Dr Hoenecke and colleagues present, is able to act as a matchmaker for pathologists looking for such opportunities, for short or long periods. Many pathologists gradually become highly subspecialized in their practice, but, as Dr Deck points out, this does not have to be an obstacle. His experience demonstrates that pathologists can contribute to the fundamentals of the medical system, through teaching and diagnostic work, even in a war-torn country such as Afghanistan. It should be emphasized, however, that such work can present significant dangers to the participating individuals; several tragic events involving death or kidnapping of journalists and health care workers demonstrate this beyond a doubt. Involvement in projects in such areas requires a great amount of prudence and appreciation of potential risks.It is well recognized that political instability and internal strife are significant determinants of health. Indeed, some resource-poor countries expend a greater portion of their budgets on the military than on health and education. Dr Adeyi describe the situation in Nigeria, where a once strong health care infrastructure has deteriorated while the fundamentals of the economy remain relatively strong. Sri Lanka, another country that has suffered from civil war, has managed to maintain a forensic medical system based on a British and Dutch tradition, albeit severely challenged, as Balachandra, Vadysinghe, and William describe. This is all the more remarkable, as forensic pathology is frequently a neglected specialty and is not practiced at all in many resource-poor countries.Many original observations have been made by those practicing in resource-poor countries—such as the original recognition of the epidemiology of Burkitt lymphoma. Drs Rambau in Tanzania and Roy and Othieno in Uganda describe aggressive forms of breast carcinoma, presenting in young women at an advanced stage. Although the epidemiologic and molecular genetic details of these tumors await further investigation, this appears to be a particularly important health problem in the region and potentially in larger portions of Africa.Although the lack of technical resources remains a serious impediment to the practice of pathology in resource-poor areas, much can be achieved using relatively simple technology. Drs Guggisberg, Okorie, and Khalil describe the use of a mobile fine-needle aspiration unit, which can provide a rapid and reliable diagnosis in many situations. Calhoun et al have developed a lightweight, portable tissue-processing unit that actually allows the production of histologic slides “in the field,” while Dr Hitchcock describes some of the applications of telepathology in areas that do not have full access to laboratory services. Dr Pagni and colleagues, working with the Italian Association of Pathologists, have developed a telepathology approach that they have found to be useful in providing assistance to a medical practice in rural Zambia, a country with next to no pathology services.Health partnerships have a tremendous potential to generate new knowledge. The importance for the personal development of those involved should be emphasized as well. Dr Valerie White describes the experience of investigating cerebral malaria in Malawi—a life-changing experience for those involved and an inspiration for others.It is the hope of those involved in this special section that, although the articles describe many different aspects of involvement in international health projects, some of our readers will find in them an inspiration to seek expression for their own aspirations for international work. We also would like to recognize the numerous pathologists who contribute regularly in this manner, whose work is not featured here. We would like to encourage the sharing of such experiences in the form of publications.We would like to acknowledge the support of Philip Cagle, MD, editor in chief for Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, in the development of the special section.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,688
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,006
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2011
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineMême sujetHistory of Medical PracticeTravaux en français237 207