MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4242347424 · doi:10.5858/135.2.171

Pathology Against the Odds

2011· article· en· W4242347424 on OpenAlex
Hallgrímur Benediktsson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyMedicineOddsInternal medicineLogistic regression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this issue of Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, a special section is devoted to the theme of pathology services in resource-poor nations. It is largely based on a symposium held at the annual meeting of the Canadian Association of Pathologists in Ottawa in July 2008, with additional contributions from other pathologists who actively provide voluntary services in developing countries.Although pathology and laboratory medicine play a crucial and central role in the modern practice of medicine, most of the globe's population do not have access to medical services with a sound basis in laboratory diagnosis. The reasons for this are, for the most part, readily evident—a lack of resources means that expensive equipment, appropriate physical facilities, and trained personnel is simply beyond the reach of many countries in what is sometimes referred to as the “developing world.” This lack of the necessary tools of our trade may frequently be compounded by cultural or political issues as well as geographical and climatologic challenges. As a result, the practice of pathology in many countries poses unfamiliar and at times difficult problems for pathologists trained in resource-rich environments. The availability of laboratory procedures is often limited, and quality control may be lacking for the ones that exist. And where the practice of medicine has been getting by without the benefit of pathology, it may be difficult to change this pattern.Pathologists who are interested in contributing to global health may find it difficult to become involved in a suitable project. Pathologists Overseas, as Dr Hoenecke and colleagues present, is able to act as a matchmaker for pathologists looking for such opportunities, for short or long periods. Many pathologists gradually become highly subspecialized in their practice, but, as Dr Deck points out, this does not have to be an obstacle. His experience demonstrates that pathologists can contribute to the fundamentals of the medical system, through teaching and diagnostic work, even in a war-torn country such as Afghanistan. It should be emphasized, however, that such work can present significant dangers to the participating individuals; several tragic events involving death or kidnapping of journalists and health care workers demonstrate this beyond a doubt. Involvement in projects in such areas requires a great amount of prudence and appreciation of potential risks.It is well recognized that political instability and internal strife are significant determinants of health. Indeed, some resource-poor countries expend a greater portion of their budgets on the military than on health and education. Dr Adeyi describe the situation in Nigeria, where a once strong health care infrastructure has deteriorated while the fundamentals of the economy remain relatively strong. Sri Lanka, another country that has suffered from civil war, has managed to maintain a forensic medical system based on a British and Dutch tradition, albeit severely challenged, as Balachandra, Vadysinghe, and William describe. This is all the more remarkable, as forensic pathology is frequently a neglected specialty and is not practiced at all in many resource-poor countries.Many original observations have been made by those practicing in resource-poor countries—such as the original recognition of the epidemiology of Burkitt lymphoma. Drs Rambau in Tanzania and Roy and Othieno in Uganda describe aggressive forms of breast carcinoma, presenting in young women at an advanced stage. Although the epidemiologic and molecular genetic details of these tumors await further investigation, this appears to be a particularly important health problem in the region and potentially in larger portions of Africa.Although the lack of technical resources remains a serious impediment to the practice of pathology in resource-poor areas, much can be achieved using relatively simple technology. Drs Guggisberg, Okorie, and Khalil describe the use of a mobile fine-needle aspiration unit, which can provide a rapid and reliable diagnosis in many situations. Calhoun et al have developed a lightweight, portable tissue-processing unit that actually allows the production of histologic slides “in the field,” while Dr Hitchcock describes some of the applications of telepathology in areas that do not have full access to laboratory services. Dr Pagni and colleagues, working with the Italian Association of Pathologists, have developed a telepathology approach that they have found to be useful in providing assistance to a medical practice in rural Zambia, a country with next to no pathology services.Health partnerships have a tremendous potential to generate new knowledge. The importance for the personal development of those involved should be emphasized as well. Dr Valerie White describes the experience of investigating cerebral malaria in Malawi—a life-changing experience for those involved and an inspiration for others.It is the hope of those involved in this special section that, although the articles describe many different aspects of involvement in international health projects, some of our readers will find in them an inspiration to seek expression for their own aspirations for international work. We also would like to recognize the numerous pathologists who contribute regularly in this manner, whose work is not featured here. We would like to encourage the sharing of such experiences in the form of publications.We would like to acknowledge the support of Philip Cagle, MD, editor in chief for Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, in the development of the special section.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it