Effect of Temperature and Pressure on Contact Angle and Interfacial Tension of Quartz-Water-Bitumen Systems
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Thermal recovery methods (such as steam injection) are recent remarkable technologies to recover bitumen from oil sands. The injected steam contacts the oil sand and forms an interface. The steam changes to water transferring its heat to bitumen across this interface. The heated bitumen will have a lower viscosity, mobilize and recover from the reservoir. Study on hot water-bitumen interfaces should be crucial in understanding the thermal recovery methods. The strength and energy of hot water-bitumen interfaces are expected to play important roles in the recovery of bitumen from oil sands. However, measurements on hot water-bitumen interfaces are not apparent in the literature. A relevant measurement would be the contact angle and interfacial tension of the waterbitumen interfaces at different temperatures. In this paper, it has been attempted to reveal and present the results of several water-bitumen contact angle and interfacial tension measurements. The measurements cover a temperature range from ambient to 100 ° C for a given pressure. The experiments are run in x-ray transparent cells and images are taken using a micro-CT scanner. The results of contact angle and the interfacial tensions of hot water-bitumen interface are produced by using the axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA) method. Introduction Thermal recovery of bitumen causes many changes in the oil sand reservoirs and in fluids properties such as viscosity, density of each fluid, interfacial tension and wettability of the aqueous-hydrocarbon and rock-fluid interfaces. Wettability measurement in the oil recovery industry is quite popular and several different methods have been used to characterize the wettability of different reservoirs. These methods are reviewed in detail by Anderson (1). They are generally categorized in two major groups; qualitative and quantitative methods. Common qualitative methods for wettability measurement are imbibition rates, microscope examination floatation, glass slide method, relative permeability curves, permeability saturation relationships, capillary pressure curves, displacement capillary pressure, reservoir logs, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and dye adsorption. Quantitative methods include contact angle, spontaneous and forced imbibition (Amott) and USBM wettability method. According to Anderson (1) the contact angle method is used to measure the wettability of a certain surface, but the Amott and USBM methods are used for core wettability measurements. Quantitative methods are more commonly used; nevertheless, there is no single universally accepted method. Contact angle (Θ) is the angle at which a fluid-fluid interface meets the solid surface. The Θ is always measured relative to the denser phase. In this work, water is the dense phase. The contact angle method is very useful for wettability measurement when working with clean surfaces and pure fluids. Typically contact angle measurements are done on oil-waterquartz surface systems in order to study the wettability variations under different temperatures and pressures. For the measurement of Θ two immiscible fluids are placed on a solid surface; fluid 1 is the denser fluid. (Θ) can vary between 0 ° and 180 °. If Θ is less than 75 °, fluid 1 is the wetting phase and if Θ is more than 105 ° fluid 2 is the wetting phase.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».