MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4243247243 · doi:10.1086/680559

Editor’s Acknowledgement of the 2014 Editorial Review Board

2015· article· en· W4243247243 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Society for Social Work and Research · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSocial Work Education and Practice
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAcknowledgementEditorial boardPsychologyComputer scienceLibrary scienceComputer network

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Next article FreeEditor’s Acknowledgement of the 2014 Editorial Review BoardPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreThe peer-review process is critical to ensuring the quality and rigor of the work published by the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research (JSSWR). Peer reviews are the core of good scholarly publishing and a hallmark of all reputable, respected journals. The members of the JSSWR Editorial Review Board listed here contributed their time and talents during 2014 to review manuscripts, provide thoughtful and constructive critiques, and encourage authors to produce their best work. These reviewers have played a vital role in maintaining the standards of the journal and promoting rigorous social work research. Indeed, the time and effort that our peer reviewers dedicate to providing well-considered reviews is a priceless gift not only to JSSWR but also to the social work field. As a gesture of our appreciation to the referees who have unselfishly given of themselves, we would like to formally thank them for their service to JSSWR.Laura Abrams, University of California, Los Angeles, USABree Akesson, McGill University, CanadaDavid Albright, University of Missouri, USAInna Altschul, University of Denver, USADavid Ansong, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAAnnahita Ball, University at Buffalo, USAMelissa Bellin, University of Maryland, USAKimberly Bender, University of Denver, USAKia J. Bentley, Virginia Commonwealth University, USAStephanie Berzin, Boston College, USABeverly Black, University of Texas at Arlington, USAAmy Blank Wilson, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAElizabeth Bowen, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, USAJohn Brekke, University of Southern California, USAEileen Brennan, Portland State University, USACharlotte Bright, University of Maryland, USAElián Cabrera-Nguyen, Washington University in St. Louis, USACarol Caton, Columbia University, USAMark Chaffin, Georgia State University, USAMimi Chapman, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USATrenette Clark, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAMary Collins, Boston University, USAKatie Cotter, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAMark Courtney, Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, USAThomas Crea, Boston College, USAGary Cuddeback, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USASusanna Curry, University of California, Los Angeles, USAMichelle Dang, California State University, Sacramento, USAThomas Davis, California State University, San Bernardino, USABruce DeForge, University of Maryland, USAPeter Delany, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, USADiane DePanfilis, University of Maryland, USALena Dominelli, Durham University, United KingdomJeffrey Draine, Temple University, USAAmy Dworsky, Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, USAWilliam Elliott, University of Kansas, USADiane Elze, University at Buffalo, USAMatthew Epperson, University of Chicago, USAMegan Feely, Washington University in St. Louis, USAJoelle Ferron, Dartmouth College, USAPatrick Fowler, Washington University in St. Louis, USAEric Garland, University of Utah, USASharon Garrett, University of Washington, USABillie Gastic, Relay Graduate School of Education, USATamika Gilreath, University of Southern California, USADebbie Gioia, University of Maryland, USAJeremy Goldbach, University of Southern California, USASean Grant, RAND Corporation, USAJohanna Greeson, University of Pennsylvania, USAThomas Gross, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, USAShenyang Guo, Washington University in St. Louis, USABaorong Guo, University of Missouri, USAWilliam Hall, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAEunhee Han, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USADonna Harrington, University of Maryland, USADan Herman, Hunter College of the City University of New York, USAJulieta Hernandez, University of Miami, USAAmber Holbrook, West Chester University, USAMatthew Howard, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAHui Huang, Florida International University, USAJin Huang, Saint Louis University, USAKun Huang, University of New Mexico, USAAidyn Iachini, University of South Carolina, USARoberta Iversen, University of Pennsylvania, USAJeremiah Jaggers, Indiana University, USAKimberly J. Johnson, Washington University in St. Louis, USAAnne Jones, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, USASusan Kemp, University of Washington, USAMatt Kerwick, University of Texas at Austin, USAJinhyun Kim, Pusan National University, KoreaJohnny Kim, University of Denver, USAPatricia Kohl, Washington University, USAKaren Kolivoski, University of Maryland, USADavid Kondrat, University of Indiana, USAJeffrey Lacasse, Florida State University, USAMichael Lambert, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAWendy Lane, University of Maryland, USAPaul Lanier, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USABethany Lee, University of Maryland, USAShawna Lee, University of Michigan, USAJung-Sook Lee, University of New South Wales, AustraliaLia Levin, Tel Aviv University, IsraelMichael Lewis Hunter College of the City University of New York, USAJilan Li, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, USAYong Li, State University of New York at Plattsburgh, USAMelissa Lippold, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAJulia Littell, Bryn Mawr College, USAEllen Lukens, Columbia University, USAJames Martin, New York University, USARainier Masa, University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, USAJason Matejkowski, University of Kansas, USAJill Messing, Arizona State University, USAVerena Metz, Columbia University, USACarmen Morano, Hunter College of the City University of New York, USAJennifer Mosley, University of Chicago, USAYunju Nam, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, USAFrances Nedjat-Haiem, University of Southern California, USAChristina Newhill, University of Pittsburgh, USAPeter Newman, University of Toronto, USAWilliam Nugent, University of Tennessee, USAMichael Nunno, Cornell University, USAIjeoma Nwabuzor Ogbonnaya, University of Southern California, USANathanael Okpych, University of Chicago, USAJulianne Oktay, University of Maryland, USAJohn Orme, University of Tennessee, USAPhilip Osteen, University of Maryland, USAYok-Fong Paat, University of Texas at El Paso, USALawrence Palinkas, University of Southern California, USAJung Min Park, Seoul National University, USADanielle Parrish, University of Houston, USAMichelle Patterson, Simon Fraser University, CanadaJennifer Payne, Azusa Pacific University, USARyan Petros, University of Pennsylvania, USACarrie Petrucci, EMT Associates, Inc., USACarrie Pettus-Davis, Washington University in St. Louis, USAAnthony Pisani, University of Rochester Medical Center, USAByron Powell, University of Pennsylvania, USAAlex Ramsey, Washington University in St. Louis, USAKaren Randolph, Florida State University, USAEric Rice, University of Southern California, USACynthia Rizo, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USARoderick Rose, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USADouglas Rugh, Caucasus Research Institute, Tbilisi, GeorgiaChristopher Salas-Wright, University of Texas at Austin, USAAndrea Savage, Hunter College of the City University of New York, USAEleanor Seaton, Arizona State University, USACorey Shdaimah, University of Maryland, USAKelsey Simons, Canandaigua VA Medical Center (NY), USAPhyllis Solomon, University of Pennsylvania, USASusan Stone, University of California at Berkeley, USARebecca L. Stotzer, University of Hawaii at Manoa, USAEmily Tanner-Smith, Vanderbilt University, USAHeather Taussig, University of Denver, USARae Thomas, Bond University, AustraliaHelle Thorning, Columbia University, USAElizabeth Tracy, Case Western Reserve University, USAJenna Tucker, University of North Carolina, USALaurens Van Sluytman, Morgan State University, USACheryl Waites, Wayne State University, USAKristina Webber, University of South Carolina, USAElizabeth Caplick Weigensberg, Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago, USAArlene Weisz, Wayne State University, USARebecca Wells, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAAllison Werner-Lin, New York University, USACatherine White, Casey Family Programs, USATraci Wike, Virginia Commonwealth University, USAScott Wilks, Louisiana State University, USAAnne Williford, University of Kansas, USAMichael Woolley, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USAShiyou Wu, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAJoanne Yaffe, University of Utah, USAMiwa Yasui, University of Chicago, USAJaehee Yi, University of Utah, USAJoan Yoo, Seoul National University, KoreaSarah Young, University of Alabama, USAMansoo Yu, University of Missouri, USABrad Zebrack, University of Michigan, USA Next article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research Volume 6, Number 1Spring 2015 Published for the Society for Social Work and Research Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/680559 © 2015 by the Society for Social Work and Research. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,015
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,691
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0150,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,106
Tête enseignante GPT0,466
Écart entre enseignants0,360 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Society for Social Work and ResearchMême sujetSocial Work Education and PracticeTravaux en français237 207