Franco-America in the Making: The Creole Nation Within by Jonathan K. Gosnell
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Franco-America in the Making: The Creole Nation Within by Jonathan K. Gosnell Susan Pinette Jonathan K. Gosnell. Franco-America in the Making: The Creole Nation Within. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2018. Pp. xv + 347. Jonathan Gosnell’s recent monograph argues for the significance of the French presence in North America. In so doing, his work steps into the void created by the characteristics that define this field. North American French communities are “the United States’ fifth largest and forgotten ethnic group” (1). “Forgotten,” for despite accounting for 6% to 25% of New England states’ populations, little of these communities is known outside of the communities themselves. This erasure arises in part from disciplinary boundaries. Since many in these Franco-American communities no longer speak French, they are omitted from studies on francophone North America. In a similar way, since French North American communities do not neatly fit into the paradigmatic understanding of “first wave” migrations (from Europe and through Ellis Island), they are often excluded from studies on white ethnicity in the United States. Gosnell avoids both of these pitfalls by keeping the theoretical context of la francophonie whether these communities speak French or not. “Many Americans today no longer master their heritage language, but there are some twenty million French speakers and people of French or francophone descent in North America. They are French as well as American linguistically, culturally, and in myriad ways that they redefine continually” (2). Gosnell’s broadening of la francophonie to include people of francophone descent and not just those who currently speak French opens up a new conceptual terrain that allows him to include all francophone heritage communities in the US. His focus in this book is on New England and southern Louisiana. Franco-America in the Making walks us through some of the key cultural institutions that define French North America. Gosnell begins by framing his choice to prioritize linguistic similarity over historical and cultural differences. He argues in Chapter One that although the French colonial settlement was short-lived, it nevertheless established “an original New World sense of Frenchness” (38) that lives on today and can be seen in traces all over America. The remaining chapters each investigate an instance of these French traces. Chapter Two explores the various institutions that teach French, including the Alliance Française and CODOFIL. Chapter Three introduces Franco-American Women’s Associations once found throughout New England. Chapter Four surveys Franco-American literature written in both English and French. Chapter Five gives an overview of key Franco-American French newspapers in New England, focusing specifically on the articulation of Franco-American identity in Worchester’s Le Travailleur, Manchester’s L’Avenir National and Le Journal de Lowell. The book ends with an exploration of the concept of creolization in Cajun music and folkways, considering the ways in which French cultures have mixed with other Americans. With these examples, Gosnell seeks to prove the importance [End Page 145] of these “understated assertion[s] of francophone life in the United States” (288), arguing that these “Franco-American sties articulate to observers evolving yet resistant ethnic cultures of North America” (289). [End Page 146] Susan Pinette University of Maine Copyright © 2020 L’Esprit Créateur
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,027 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».