MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4244886566 · doi:10.1353/esp.2020.0040

Franco-America in the Making: The Creole Nation Within by Jonathan K. Gosnell

2020· article· fr· W4244886566 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan Pinette

Bibliographic record

Venue˜L'œesprit créateur/˜L'œEsprit créateur · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrenchCreole languageContext (archaeology)White (mutation)HistoryCanadian studiesMaking-ofEthnic groupEthnologyGenealogySociologyGender studiesAnthropologyMedia studiesLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Franco-America in the Making: The Creole Nation Within by Jonathan K. Gosnell Susan Pinette Jonathan K. Gosnell. Franco-America in the Making: The Creole Nation Within. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2018. Pp. xv + 347. Jonathan Gosnell’s recent monograph argues for the significance of the French presence in North America. In so doing, his work steps into the void created by the characteristics that define this field. North American French communities are “the United States’ fifth largest and forgotten ethnic group” (1). “Forgotten,” for despite accounting for 6% to 25% of New England states’ populations, little of these communities is known outside of the communities themselves. This erasure arises in part from disciplinary boundaries. Since many in these Franco-American communities no longer speak French, they are omitted from studies on francophone North America. In a similar way, since French North American communities do not neatly fit into the paradigmatic understanding of “first wave” migrations (from Europe and through Ellis Island), they are often excluded from studies on white ethnicity in the United States. Gosnell avoids both of these pitfalls by keeping the theoretical context of la francophonie whether these communities speak French or not. “Many Americans today no longer master their heritage language, but there are some twenty million French speakers and people of French or francophone descent in North America. They are French as well as American linguistically, culturally, and in myriad ways that they redefine continually” (2). Gosnell’s broadening of la francophonie to include people of francophone descent and not just those who currently speak French opens up a new conceptual terrain that allows him to include all francophone heritage communities in the US. His focus in this book is on New England and southern Louisiana. Franco-America in the Making walks us through some of the key cultural institutions that define French North America. Gosnell begins by framing his choice to prioritize linguistic similarity over historical and cultural differences. He argues in Chapter One that although the French colonial settlement was short-lived, it nevertheless established “an original New World sense of Frenchness” (38) that lives on today and can be seen in traces all over America. The remaining chapters each investigate an instance of these French traces. Chapter Two explores the various institutions that teach French, including the Alliance Française and CODOFIL. Chapter Three introduces Franco-American Women’s Associations once found throughout New England. Chapter Four surveys Franco-American literature written in both English and French. Chapter Five gives an overview of key Franco-American French newspapers in New England, focusing specifically on the articulation of Franco-American identity in Worchester’s Le Travailleur, Manchester’s L’Avenir National and Le Journal de Lowell. The book ends with an exploration of the concept of creolization in Cajun music and folkways, considering the ways in which French cultures have mixed with other Americans. With these examples, Gosnell seeks to prove the importance [End Page 145] of these “understated assertion[s] of francophone life in the United States” (288), arguing that these “Franco-American sties articulate to observers evolving yet resistant ethnic cultures of North America” (289). [End Page 146] Susan Pinette University of Maine Copyright © 2020 L’Esprit Créateur

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜L'œesprit créateur/˜L'œEsprit créateurSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207