Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It was an immense honour to bring the 27th International Nuclear Physics Conference (INPC2019) to the city of Glasgow in August 2019. The location of each conference is decided by Commission 12 (Nuclear Physics) of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP). The event in Glasgow followed conferences in Adelaide 2016, Florence 2013 and Vancouver 2010, and this was the first time it had been held in Scotland. As can be seen from the list of local organisers, this was very much a joint effort from across the whole of the UK nuclear physics community. Held every three years, INPC is one of the most important conference series in the world for fundamental nuclear physics, covering as it does a wide range of topic areas from the study of hadrons to the heaviest of nuclei, and the role of nuclear physics in our understanding of the universe. These proceedings represent a sample of some of the very best research in nuclear physics. What is abundantly clear is that nuclear physics as a research field is in rude health, and continues to be an area that attracts some of the best scientific talent, with many active programmes addressing fundamental questions in nature. At the same time, nuclear physics provides real impact to society through applications and the training of the next generation of researchers. For the first time at an INPC, a dedicated parallel session on public engagement was held, indicating the enthusiasm for promoting the field to a wider audience, and how it can be used to stimulate interest in science in general. The importance of applications of nuclear science was also highlighted, and one of the busiest sessions of the conference proved to be “Societal Impact”, where many topics were discussed, including medical applications, environmental monitoring (including reactor monitoring), isotope production, archaeology, nuclear security and precision timing. Contributions from both public engagement and societal impact areas are well represented in this collection of papers. The reviewing of the proceedings contributions was undertaken by the local organisers, together with several colleagues who had kindly acted as convenors of the parallel sessions during the conference. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the reviewers warmly for their efforts. It was a real pleasure organising this conference, and I would also like to thank once again the Institute of Physics Conferences team for all their help and support throughout the process of planning, and delivering a successful conference. David Ireland, University of Glasgow, UK (Conference chair), on behalf of the local organising committee: Marialuisa Aliotta, University of Edinburgh, UK Carlo Barbieri, University of Surrey, UK Alison Bruce, University of Brighton, UK Christian Diget, University of York, UK Kieran Flanagan, University of Manchester, UK Bill Gelletly, University of Surrey, UK Rodi Herzberg, University of Liverpool, UK Peter Jones, University of Birmingham, UK Alison Laird, University of York, UK Paddy Regan, University of Surrey, UK Marcus Scheck, University of the West of Scotland, UK John Simpson, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK Daria Sokhan, University of Glasgow, UK
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».