MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2020· article· en· W4245159434 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmSession (web analytics)Library scienceHonourEvent (particle physics)Political sciencePhysicsComputer sciencePsychologyLawAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It was an immense honour to bring the 27th International Nuclear Physics Conference (INPC2019) to the city of Glasgow in August 2019. The location of each conference is decided by Commission 12 (Nuclear Physics) of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP). The event in Glasgow followed conferences in Adelaide 2016, Florence 2013 and Vancouver 2010, and this was the first time it had been held in Scotland. As can be seen from the list of local organisers, this was very much a joint effort from across the whole of the UK nuclear physics community. Held every three years, INPC is one of the most important conference series in the world for fundamental nuclear physics, covering as it does a wide range of topic areas from the study of hadrons to the heaviest of nuclei, and the role of nuclear physics in our understanding of the universe. These proceedings represent a sample of some of the very best research in nuclear physics. What is abundantly clear is that nuclear physics as a research field is in rude health, and continues to be an area that attracts some of the best scientific talent, with many active programmes addressing fundamental questions in nature. At the same time, nuclear physics provides real impact to society through applications and the training of the next generation of researchers. For the first time at an INPC, a dedicated parallel session on public engagement was held, indicating the enthusiasm for promoting the field to a wider audience, and how it can be used to stimulate interest in science in general. The importance of applications of nuclear science was also highlighted, and one of the busiest sessions of the conference proved to be “Societal Impact”, where many topics were discussed, including medical applications, environmental monitoring (including reactor monitoring), isotope production, archaeology, nuclear security and precision timing. Contributions from both public engagement and societal impact areas are well represented in this collection of papers. The reviewing of the proceedings contributions was undertaken by the local organisers, together with several colleagues who had kindly acted as convenors of the parallel sessions during the conference. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the reviewers warmly for their efforts. It was a real pleasure organising this conference, and I would also like to thank once again the Institute of Physics Conferences team for all their help and support throughout the process of planning, and delivering a successful conference. David Ireland, University of Glasgow, UK (Conference chair), on behalf of the local organising committee: Marialuisa Aliotta, University of Edinburgh, UK Carlo Barbieri, University of Surrey, UK Alison Bruce, University of Brighton, UK Christian Diget, University of York, UK Kieran Flanagan, University of Manchester, UK Bill Gelletly, University of Surrey, UK Rodi Herzberg, University of Liverpool, UK Peter Jones, University of Birmingham, UK Alison Laird, University of York, UK Paddy Regan, University of Surrey, UK Marcus Scheck, University of the West of Scotland, UK John Simpson, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK Daria Sokhan, University of Glasgow, UK

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicGraphite, nuclear technology, radiation studiesFrench-language works237,207