Notice bibliographique
Résumé
05–104Alwright, D. (U of Lancaster, UK), From teaching points to learning opportunities and beyond. TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria, VA, USA) 39.1 (2005), 9–32. 05–105Beckett, G. & Slater, T. (U of Cincinnati, USA), The Project Framework: a tool for language, content, and skills integration. ELT Journal (Oxford, UK) 59.2 (2005), 108–116. 05–106Belcher, Diane D. (Georgia State U, USA; dbelcher1@gsu.edu ), Trends in teaching English for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004), 165–186. 05–107Berne, Jane E. (U North Dakota, USA), Listening comprehension strategies: a review of the literature. Foreign Language Annals (Alexandria, VA, USA) 37.4 (2004), 521–533. 05–108Bohn, Mariko T. (Stanford U, USA; mbohn@stanford.edu ), Japanese classroom behavior: a micro-analysis of self-reports versus classroom observations with implications for language teachers. Applied Language Learning (Monterey, CA, USA) 14.1 (2004), 1–35. 05–109Byon, Andrew Sangpil (Albany State U, USA; abyon@albany.edu ), Learning linguistic politeness. Applied Language Learning (Monterey, CA, USA) 14.1 (2004), 37–62. 05–110Carrell, Patricia L., Dunkel, Patricia A. (Georgia State U, USA; pcarrell@gsu.edu ) & Mollaun, Pamela, The effects of notetaking, lecture length, and topic on a computer-based test of ESL listening comprehension. Applied Language Learning (Monterey, CA, USA) 14.1 (2004), 83–105. 05–111Chacón, Carmen Teresa (U of Los Andes Tachira, Venezuela; ctchacon@cantv.net ), Teachers' perceived efficacy among English as a foreign language teachers in middle schools in Venezuela. Teaching and Teacher Education (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 21.3 (2005), 257–273. 05–112Dewey, Dan P. (U of Pittsburgh, USA), Connections between teacher and student attitudes regarding script choice in first-year Japanese language classrooms. Foreign Language Annals (Alexandria, VA, USA) 37.4 (2004), 567–583. 05–113Dogancay-Aktuna, S. (Southern Illinois U, USA), Intercultural communication in English language teacher education. ELT Journal (Oxford, UK) 59.2 (2005), 99–107. 05–114Doyé, Peter (Technische Universität Brunschweig, Germany; p.doye@tu-bs.de ), A methodological framework for the teaching of intercomprehension. Language Learning Journal (Rugby, UK) 30 (2004), 59–68. 05–115Erling, Elisabeth J. (Freie Universität Berlin, Germany), The many names of English. English Today (Cambridge, UK) 21.1 (2005), 40–44. 05–116Flowerdew, Lynne (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China; lclynn@ust.hk ), An integration of corpus-based and genre-based approaches to text analysis in EAP/ESP: countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies. English for Specific Purposes (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 24.3 (2005), 321–332. 05–117Grabe, William (Northern Arizona U, USA; William.Grabe@nau.edu ), Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004), 44–69. 05–118Jackson, J. (Chinese U of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; jjackson@edu.hk ), An inter-university, cross-disciplinary analysis of business education: perceptions of business faculty in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 24.3 (2005), 293–306. 05–119Jarrell, Douglas (Nagoya Women's U, Japan; djarrell@nagoya-wu.ac.jp ) & Mark R. Freiermuth (Gunma Prefectural Women's U, Japan; mark-f@gpwu.ac.jp ), The motivational power of internet chat. RELC Journal (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) 36.1 (2005), 59–72. 05–120Jenkins, Jennifer (Kings College London, UK; jennifer.jenkins@kcl.ac.uk ), Research in teaching pronunciation and intonation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004), 109–125. 05–121Kern, Richard, Ware, Paige (California U, Berkeley, USA; kernrg@socrates.berkeley.edu ) & Warschauer, Mark, Crossing frontiers: new directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004), 243–260. 05–122Lou Leaver, Betty (New York Institute of Technology, USA), Ehrman, Madeline & Lekic, Maria, Distinguished-level learning online: support materials from LangNet and RussNet. Foreign Language Annals (Alexandria, VA, USA) 37.4 (2004), 556–566. 05–123McCarthy, Michael (Nottingham U, UK) & O'Keefe, Anne, Research in the teaching of speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004), 26–43. 05–124McGarry, Richard (Appalachian State U, NC, USA), Error correction as a cultural phenomenon. Applied Language Learning (Monterey, CA, USA) 14.1 (2004), 63–82. 05–125Nassaji, Hossein (Victoria U, Canada; nassaji@uvic.ca ) & Fotos, Sandra, Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004), 126–145. 05–126Perrin, G. (German Government Language Centre, Germany), Teachers, testers, and the research enterprise – a slow meeting of minds. ELT Journal (Oxford, UK) 59.2 (2005), 144–150. 05–127Seidlhofer, Barbara (Vienna U, Austria; barbara.seidlhofer@univie.ac.at ), Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004), 209–239. 05–128Silva, Tony (Purdue U, USA; tony@purdue.edu ) & Brice, Colleen, Research in teaching writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004), 70–106. 05–129Simmons-Mcdonald, Hazel (West Indies U, Barbados; hsimmac@uwichill.edu.bb ), Trends in teaching standard varieties to creole and vernacular speakers. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004), 187–208. 05–130Stoller, Fredricka L. (Northern Arizona U, USA; Fredricka.Stoller@nau.edu ), Content-based instruction: perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004),
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,420 | 0,290 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».