MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4245533180 · doi:10.1086/692085

Contributors

2017· article· en· W4245533180 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican Journal of Sociology · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSocial Power and Status Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSociologyLife course approachKnightPoliticsBureaucracySocial researchGender studiesSocial sciencePolitical scienceLawPsychologySocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Previous articleNext article FreeContributorsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreSteven Samford is a postdoctoral fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs (University of Toronto) and will be an assistant professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan beginning fall 2017. He studies business organizations and bureaucracies and their interactions, with a particular focus on technological upgrading and development.Andrei Boutyline is a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. He studies how culture is organized on a society-wide scale. For this purpose, he has developed a series of novel techniques that capture structure within cultural data. His work to date has examined political attitudes, tastes for cultural products, and tendencies for seeking the company of like-minded others.Stephen Vaisey is professor of sociology at Duke University. The main goal of his research is to understand the origins, structures, and effects of moral and political beliefs.Anette Eva Fasang is full professor of sociology at Humboldt University of Berlin and head of the research group Demography and Inequality at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center. Her research interests include family demography, stratification, life course sociology, and quantitative methods for longitudinal data analysis.Silke Aisenbrey is associate professor of sociology at Yeshiva College, Yeshiva University in New York City. Her research investigates the intersection of work and family life, with a focus on social inequality, comparative welfare states and gender. She analyzes these issues from a life course perspective.Carly Knight is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Sociology at Harvard University, with interests in economic and political sociology. Her work explores the cultural, political, and moral consequences of the growing importance of the market in the 20th century. She is particularly interested in using quantitative methods to explore how moral attitudes and economic beliefs change in response to market imperatives. Her dissertation focuses on changing conceptions of the corporation among legal theorists and anticorporate activists during the rise of big business.Mary C. Brinton is the Reischauer Institute Professor of Sociology at Harvard University. Her research focuses on comparative gender inequality and labor market change in postindustrial societies, with particular attention to contemporary Japan and South Korea. Her current research analyzes the causes of very low fertility in East Asia and Europe, using survey data as well as structured in-depth interviews with young adult men and women in five countries.Rory McVeigh is professor of sociology at the University of Notre Dame and director of the Center for the Study of Social Movements. His work examines both causes and consequences of conflict and inequality. He is the author of The Rise of the Ku Klux Klan: Right-Wing Movements and National Politics (University of Minnesota Press, 2009). His current work investigates consequences of political polarization in the United States.Bryant Crubaugh is assistant professor in the Department Sociology at Pepperdine University. His research investigates how communities collectively organize and how their organizations shape, or are shaped by, structural inequality.Kevin Estep is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department Sociology at the University of Notre Dame, where he is also affiliated with the Center for the Study of Social Movements and the Center for the Study of Religion and Society. His research investigates intergroup conflict and how it relates to politics, inequality, and public health. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by American Journal of Sociology Volume 122, Number 5March 2017 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/692085 © 2017 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,212
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,005
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,378
Écart entre enseignants0,362 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle