Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous articleNext article FreeContributorsPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreSteven Samford is a postdoctoral fellow at the Munk School of Global Affairs (University of Toronto) and will be an assistant professor of Organizational Studies at the University of Michigan beginning fall 2017. He studies business organizations and bureaucracies and their interactions, with a particular focus on technological upgrading and development.Andrei Boutyline is a Ph.D. candidate in sociology at the University of California, Berkeley. He studies how culture is organized on a society-wide scale. For this purpose, he has developed a series of novel techniques that capture structure within cultural data. His work to date has examined political attitudes, tastes for cultural products, and tendencies for seeking the company of like-minded others.Stephen Vaisey is professor of sociology at Duke University. The main goal of his research is to understand the origins, structures, and effects of moral and political beliefs.Anette Eva Fasang is full professor of sociology at Humboldt University of Berlin and head of the research group Demography and Inequality at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center. Her research interests include family demography, stratification, life course sociology, and quantitative methods for longitudinal data analysis.Silke Aisenbrey is associate professor of sociology at Yeshiva College, Yeshiva University in New York City. Her research investigates the intersection of work and family life, with a focus on social inequality, comparative welfare states and gender. She analyzes these issues from a life course perspective.Carly Knight is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Sociology at Harvard University, with interests in economic and political sociology. Her work explores the cultural, political, and moral consequences of the growing importance of the market in the 20th century. She is particularly interested in using quantitative methods to explore how moral attitudes and economic beliefs change in response to market imperatives. Her dissertation focuses on changing conceptions of the corporation among legal theorists and anticorporate activists during the rise of big business.Mary C. Brinton is the Reischauer Institute Professor of Sociology at Harvard University. Her research focuses on comparative gender inequality and labor market change in postindustrial societies, with particular attention to contemporary Japan and South Korea. Her current research analyzes the causes of very low fertility in East Asia and Europe, using survey data as well as structured in-depth interviews with young adult men and women in five countries.Rory McVeigh is professor of sociology at the University of Notre Dame and director of the Center for the Study of Social Movements. His work examines both causes and consequences of conflict and inequality. He is the author of The Rise of the Ku Klux Klan: Right-Wing Movements and National Politics (University of Minnesota Press, 2009). His current work investigates consequences of political polarization in the United States.Bryant Crubaugh is assistant professor in the Department Sociology at Pepperdine University. His research investigates how communities collectively organize and how their organizations shape, or are shaped by, structural inequality.Kevin Estep is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department Sociology at the University of Notre Dame, where he is also affiliated with the Center for the Study of Social Movements and the Center for the Study of Religion and Society. His research investigates intergroup conflict and how it relates to politics, inequality, and public health. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by American Journal of Sociology Volume 122, Number 5March 2017 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/692085 © 2017 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it