Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
05–225 Acevedo Butcher, Carmen (Sogang U, Korea), The case against the ‘native speaker’ . English Today (Cambridge, UK) 21 .2 (2005), 13–24. 05–226 Barcroft, Joe & Mitchell S. Sommers (Washington U in St. Louis, USA; barcroft@wustl.edu ), Effects of acoustic variability on second language vocabulary learning . Studies in Second Language Acquisition (Cambridge, UK) 27 .3 (2005), 387–414. 05–227 Barr, David, Jonathan Leakey & Alexandre Ranchoux (U of Ulster, UK), Told like it is! An evaluation of an integrated oral development pilot project . Language Learning & Technology (U of Hawaii, Manoa, USA) 9 .3 (2005), 55–78. 05–228 Belz, Julie A. (Pennsylvania State U, USA), Intercultural questioning, discovery and tension in Internet-mediated language learning partnerships . Language and Intercultural Communication (Clevedon, UK) 5 .1 (2005), 3–39. 05–229 Berry, Roger (Lingan U, Hong Kong, China), Who do they think ‘we’ is? Learners' awareness of personality in pedagogic grammars . Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK) 14 .2/3 (2005), 84–97. 05–230 Braun, Sabine (U of Tübingen, Germany; sabine.braun@uni-tuebingen.de ), From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents . ReCALL (Cambridge, UK) 17 .1 (2005), 47–64. 05–231 Chambers, Angela (U of Limerick, Ireland; Angela.Chambers@ul.ie ), Integrating corpus consultation in language studies . Language Learning & Technology (Hawaii, Manoa, USA) 9 .2 (2005), 111–125. 05–232 Cortés, Ileana, Jesús Ramirez, María Rivera, Marta Viada & Joan Fayer (U of Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico), Dame un hamburger plain con ketchup y papitas . English Today (Cambridge, UK) 21 .2 (2005), 35–42. 05–233 Dewaele, Jean-Marc (U of London, UK), Sociodemographic, psychological and politicocultural correlates in Flemish students' attitudes towards French and English . Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development (Clevedon, UK) 26 .2 (2005), 118–137. 05–234 Elkhafaifi, Hussein (Washington U, USA; hme3@u.washington.edu ), Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom . The Modern Language Journal (Malden, MA, USA) 89 .2 (2005), 206–220. 05–235 Flowerdew, Lynne (Hong Kong U of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China; lclynne@ust.hk ), Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why?’ . Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 4 .2 (2005), 135–147. 05–236 Fortune, Alan (King's College London, UK), Learners' use of metalanguage in collaborative form-focused L2 output tasks . Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK) 14 .1 (2005), 21–39. 05–237 Garner, Mark & Erik Borg (Northumbria U, UK; mark.garner@unn.ac.uk ), An ecological perspective on content-based instruction . Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 4 .2 (2005), 119–134. 05–238 Gourlay, Lesley (Napier U, UK; l.gourlay@napier.ac.uk ), Directions and indirect action: learner adaptation of a classroom task . ELT Journal (Oxford, UK) 59 .3 (2005), 209–216. 05–239 Granville, Stella & Laura Dison (U of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; granvils@iweb.co.za ), Thinking about thinking: integrating self-reflection into an academic literacy course . Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 4 .2 (2005), 99–118. 05–240 Greidanus, Tine, Bianca Beks (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; t.greidanus@worldonline.nl ) & Richard Wakely , Testing the development of French word knowledge by advanced Dutch- and English-speaking learners and native speakers . The Modern Language Journal (Malden, MA, USA) 89 .2 (2005), 221–233. 05–241 Gumock Jeon-Ellis, Robert Debski & Gillian Wigglesworth (U of Melbourne, Australia), Oral interaction around computers in the project oriented CALL classroom . Language Learning & Technology (U of Hawaii, Manoa, USA) 9 .3 (2005), 121–145. 05–242 Haig, Yvonne, Oliver Rhonda & Judith Rochecouste (Edith Cowan U, Australia), Adolescent speech networks and communicative competence . English in Australia (Norwood, Australia) 141 (2004), 49–57. 05–243 Harwood, Nigel (U of Essex, UK; nharwood@essex.ac.uk ), What do we want EAP teaching materials for? Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 4 .2 (2005), 149–161. 05–244 Heift, Trude (Simon Fraser U, Canada; heift@sfu.ca. ), Inspectable learner reports for web-based language learning . ReCALL (Cambridge, UK) 17 .1 (2005), 32–46. 05–245 Ibrahim, Nizar (Lebanese U, Lebanon; pronizar@yahoo.com ) & Susan Penfield , Dynamic diversity: new dimensions in mixed composition classes . ELT Journal (Oxford, UK) 59 .3 (2005), 217–225. 05–246 Jepson, Kevin (Monterey Institute of International Studies, USA), Conversations – and negotiated interaction – in text and voice chat rooms . Language Learning & Technology (U of Hawaii, Manoa, USA) 9 .3 (2005), 79–98. 05–247 Juffs, Alan (U of Pittsburgh, USA; juffs@pitt.edu ), The influence of first language on the processing of wh -movement in English as a second language . Second Language Research (London, UK) 21 .2 (2005), 121–151. 05–248 Knight, Paul (The Open U, UK; P. T. Knight@open.ac.uk ), Learner interaction using email: the effects of task modification . ReCALL (Cambridge, UK), 17 .1 (2005), 101–121. 05–249 Kondo, Takako (U of Essex, UK), Overpassivization in second language acquisition . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching ( IRAL ) (Berlin, Germany) 43 .2. (2005), 129–161. 05–250 Lewin, Beverly A. (Tel Aviv U, Israel; lewinb@post.tau.ac.il ), Hedging: an exploratory study of authors and readers identification of ‘toning down’ in scientific texts . Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 4 .2 (2005), 163–178. 05–251 Malmqvist, Anita (Umeå U, Sweden), How does group discussion in reconstruction tasks affect written language output . Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle