Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sanders replies: These letters provide a welcome alternative viewpoint to my support for scientific conferences independent of politics. The central disagreement between me and the writers of these letters is whether a conference should be held completely independently of the host nation’s politics—provided of course that safety of participants is guaranteed—or whether political matters, such as banning people based on citizenship or human rights violations, should militate against organizing such conferences.I support the goal of the universal right of all scientists, regardless of citizenship, to participate in open scientific meetings, and equally support the goal of universal respect for human rights. The question before us then is whether it is better to hold conferences, even under compromised conditions, or not to hold them, with the hope that the lack of engagement will drive change.In our complex world, we need the yin and the yang of political and cultural engagement. Sanctions and boycotts have a place, but scientists in every country have a need for contact with others with whom to share ideas, to collaborate, and to learn and teach.In the sports, music, and science worlds, we are seeing exchanges that somewhat transcend politics. This year the Summer Olympics were held in China, and the New York Philharmonic played a concert in North Korea. In 2007 the 38th International Physics Olympiad was held in Iran. These events are important in bringing together athletes, musicians, and scientists, but also in catalyzing change in our global society.The letter writers have in common the view that holding these conferences is tantamount to appeasement. If they think that threatening to cancel a conference or holding it once and refusing to do so again is an effective tool for creating a better world for science, they may do so, either on their own or with some allies. Personally I regard threats and cancellations as counterproductive. Perhaps the letter writers see a way forward that I do not see.As I write this letter (1 October 2008), I am returning from the First International Iran Summer School on Quantum Information, which I co-organized and which featured top international speakers. Sixty-eight students chose to participate, including several international students; unfortunately Israelis were forbidden. In our imperfect world, the students were grateful for the opportunity to learn, and the speakers for the opportunity to share knowledge. Despite the compromises, the school was a positive event that built scientific discourse independent of politics but constrained by reality.© 2008 American Institute of Physics.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».