Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
04–533 Cheng, Winnie and Warren, Martin (Hong Kong Polytechnic U., Email : egwcheng@polyu.edu.hk ). Peer assessment of language proficiency . Language Testing (London, UK), 22 , 1 (2005), 93–121. 04–534 Malabonga, Valerie, Kenyon, Dorry M. and Carpenter, Helen (Centre for Applied Linguistics, Washington, USA; Email : valerie@cal.org ). Self-assessment, preparation and response time on a computerised oral proficiency test . Language Testing (London, UK), 22 , 1 (2005), 59–92. 04–535 Parkinson, Jean and Adendorff, Ralph (U. of Natal, India). The use of popular science articles in teaching scientific literacy . English for Specific Purposes (Oxford, UK), 23 , 4 (2004), 379–396. 04–536 Quinn, M. (Melbourne U., Australia). Talking with Jess: Looking at how metalanguage assisted explanation writing in the Middle Years . Australian Journal of Language and Literacy (Norwood, South Australia), 27 , 3 (2004), 246–261. 04–537 Raphael, T. E., Florio-Raine, S. and George, M. (Oakland U., Australia). Book club plus: organising your literacy curriculum to bring students to high levels of literacy . Australian Journal of Language and Literacy (Norwood, South Australia), 27 , 3 (2004), 198–216. 04–538 Reed, Malcolm (U. of Bristol, UK). Write or wrong? A sociocultural approach to schooled writing . English in Education (Sheffield, UK), 38 , 1 (2004), 21–38. 04–539 Ren, Guanxin. Introducing oval writing. Babel – Journal of the AFMLTA (Queensland, Australia), 39 , 1 (2004), 4–10. 04–540 Richgels, Donald J. (Northern Illinois U., USA; Email : richgels@niu.edu ). Paying attention to language . Reading Research Quarterly (Newark, USA), 39 , 4 (2004), 470–477. 04–541 Sang-Keun, Shin (Ewha Womens U. Seoul, Korea; Email : sangshin@ewhaac.kr ). Did they take the same test? Examinee language proficiency and the structure of language tests . Language Testing (London,UK), 22 , 1 (2005), 31–57. 04–542 Schoonen, Rob (U. of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Email : rob.schoonen@uva.nl ). Generalisability of writing scores: an application of structural equation modelling . Language Testing (London, UK), 22 , 1 (2005), 1–30. 04–543 So, Bronia (U. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Email : bronia_so@yahoo.com.hk ). From analysis to pedagogic applications: using newspaper genres to write school genres . Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Oxford, UK), 4 , 1 (2005), 67–82. 04–544 Spodark, Edwina (Hollins U., USA; Email : spodark@hollins.edu ). “French in Cyberspace”: an online French course for undergraduates . CALICO Journal (Texas, USA), 22 , 1 (2004), 83–101. 04–545 Sutherland-Smith, Wendy (Deakin U., Australia; Email : wendyss@deakin.edu.au ). Pandora's box: academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing . Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Oxford, UK), 4 , 1 (2005), 83–95. 04–546 Thurstun, Jennifer (Macquarie U., Australia). Teaching and learning the reading of homepages . Prospect (Sydney, Australia), 19 , 2 (2004), 56–71. 04–547 Valencia, S. W. and Riddle Buly, M. (Washington U., USA). Behind test scores: What struggling readers REALLY need . Australian Journal of Language and Literacy (Norwood, South Australia), 27 , 3 (2004), 217–233. 04–548 Warschauer, Mark (U. of California, USA; Email : markw@uci.edu ), Grant, David, Del Real, Gabriel and Rousseau, Michele. Promoting academic literacy with technology: successful laptop programs in K-12 schools . System (Oxford, UK), 32 , 4 (2004), 525–537. 04–549 Young, Richard F. and Miller, Elisabeth R. (U. of Wisconsin, USA; Email : rfyoungt@wisc.edu ). Learning as changing participation: discourse roles in ESL writing conferences . The Modern Language Journal (Malden, MA, USA), 88 , 4 (2004), 519–535. 04–550 Bernhardt, Elizabeth B., Rivera, Raymond J. and Kamil, Michael L. (Stanford U., USA). The practicality and efficiency of web-based placement testing for college-level language programs . Foreign Language Annals (Alexandria, VA, USA), 37 , 3 (2004), 356–366. 04–551 Brown, Gavin T. L. (U. of Auckland, New Zealand; Email : gt.brown@auckland.ac.uz ), Glasswell, Kath and Harland, Don. Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system . Assessing Writing (New York, USA), 9 , 2 (2004), 105–121. 04–552 Hawkey, Roger and Barker, Fiona (Cambridge ESOL, UK; Email : roger@hawkey58.freeserve.co.uk ). Developing a common scale for the assessment of writing . Assessing Writing (New York, USA), 9 (2004), 122–159. 04–553 Peterson, Shelley, Childs, Ruth and Kennedy, Kerrie (U. of Toronto, Canada; Email : slpeterson@oise.utoronto.ca ). Written feedback and scoring of sixth-grade girls' and boys' narrative and persuasive writing . Assessing Writing (New York, USA), 9 (2004), 160–180. 04–554 Watson Todd, Richard (King Mongkut's U. of Technology Thonburi, Thailand; Email : irictodd@kmutt.ac.th ), Glasswell, Kath and Harland, Don. Measuring the coherence of writing using topic-based analysis . Assessing Writing (New York, USA), 9 , 2 (2004), 85–104.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle