Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
04–533 Cheng, Winnie and Warren, Martin (Hong Kong Polytechnic U., Email : egwcheng@polyu.edu.hk ). Peer assessment of language proficiency . Language Testing (London, UK), 22 , 1 (2005), 93–121. 04–534 Malabonga, Valerie, Kenyon, Dorry M. and Carpenter, Helen (Centre for Applied Linguistics, Washington, USA; Email : valerie@cal.org ). Self-assessment, preparation and response time on a computerised oral proficiency test . Language Testing (London, UK), 22 , 1 (2005), 59–92. 04–535 Parkinson, Jean and Adendorff, Ralph (U. of Natal, India). The use of popular science articles in teaching scientific literacy . English for Specific Purposes (Oxford, UK), 23 , 4 (2004), 379–396. 04–536 Quinn, M. (Melbourne U., Australia). Talking with Jess: Looking at how metalanguage assisted explanation writing in the Middle Years . Australian Journal of Language and Literacy (Norwood, South Australia), 27 , 3 (2004), 246–261. 04–537 Raphael, T. E., Florio-Raine, S. and George, M. (Oakland U., Australia). Book club plus: organising your literacy curriculum to bring students to high levels of literacy . Australian Journal of Language and Literacy (Norwood, South Australia), 27 , 3 (2004), 198–216. 04–538 Reed, Malcolm (U. of Bristol, UK). Write or wrong? A sociocultural approach to schooled writing . English in Education (Sheffield, UK), 38 , 1 (2004), 21–38. 04–539 Ren, Guanxin. Introducing oval writing. Babel – Journal of the AFMLTA (Queensland, Australia), 39 , 1 (2004), 4–10. 04–540 Richgels, Donald J. (Northern Illinois U., USA; Email : richgels@niu.edu ). Paying attention to language . Reading Research Quarterly (Newark, USA), 39 , 4 (2004), 470–477. 04–541 Sang-Keun, Shin (Ewha Womens U. Seoul, Korea; Email : sangshin@ewhaac.kr ). Did they take the same test? Examinee language proficiency and the structure of language tests . Language Testing (London,UK), 22 , 1 (2005), 31–57. 04–542 Schoonen, Rob (U. of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Email : rob.schoonen@uva.nl ). Generalisability of writing scores: an application of structural equation modelling . Language Testing (London, UK), 22 , 1 (2005), 1–30. 04–543 So, Bronia (U. of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Email : bronia_so@yahoo.com.hk ). From analysis to pedagogic applications: using newspaper genres to write school genres . Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Oxford, UK), 4 , 1 (2005), 67–82. 04–544 Spodark, Edwina (Hollins U., USA; Email : spodark@hollins.edu ). “French in Cyberspace”: an online French course for undergraduates . CALICO Journal (Texas, USA), 22 , 1 (2004), 83–101. 04–545 Sutherland-Smith, Wendy (Deakin U., Australia; Email : wendyss@deakin.edu.au ). Pandora's box: academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing . Journal of English for Academic Purposes (Oxford, UK), 4 , 1 (2005), 83–95. 04–546 Thurstun, Jennifer (Macquarie U., Australia). Teaching and learning the reading of homepages . Prospect (Sydney, Australia), 19 , 2 (2004), 56–71. 04–547 Valencia, S. W. and Riddle Buly, M. (Washington U., USA). Behind test scores: What struggling readers REALLY need . Australian Journal of Language and Literacy (Norwood, South Australia), 27 , 3 (2004), 217–233. 04–548 Warschauer, Mark (U. of California, USA; Email : markw@uci.edu ), Grant, David, Del Real, Gabriel and Rousseau, Michele. Promoting academic literacy with technology: successful laptop programs in K-12 schools . System (Oxford, UK), 32 , 4 (2004), 525–537. 04–549 Young, Richard F. and Miller, Elisabeth R. (U. of Wisconsin, USA; Email : rfyoungt@wisc.edu ). Learning as changing participation: discourse roles in ESL writing conferences . The Modern Language Journal (Malden, MA, USA), 88 , 4 (2004), 519–535. 04–550 Bernhardt, Elizabeth B., Rivera, Raymond J. and Kamil, Michael L. (Stanford U., USA). The practicality and efficiency of web-based placement testing for college-level language programs . Foreign Language Annals (Alexandria, VA, USA), 37 , 3 (2004), 356–366. 04–551 Brown, Gavin T. L. (U. of Auckland, New Zealand; Email : gt.brown@auckland.ac.uz ), Glasswell, Kath and Harland, Don. Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system . Assessing Writing (New York, USA), 9 , 2 (2004), 105–121. 04–552 Hawkey, Roger and Barker, Fiona (Cambridge ESOL, UK; Email : roger@hawkey58.freeserve.co.uk ). Developing a common scale for the assessment of writing . Assessing Writing (New York, USA), 9 (2004), 122–159. 04–553 Peterson, Shelley, Childs, Ruth and Kennedy, Kerrie (U. of Toronto, Canada; Email : slpeterson@oise.utoronto.ca ). Written feedback and scoring of sixth-grade girls' and boys' narrative and persuasive writing . Assessing Writing (New York, USA), 9 (2004), 160–180. 04–554 Watson Todd, Richard (King Mongkut's U. of Technology Thonburi, Thailand; Email : irictodd@kmutt.ac.th ), Glasswell, Kath and Harland, Don. Measuring the coherence of writing using topic-based analysis . Assessing Writing (New York, USA), 9 , 2 (2004), 85–104.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it