Health, Safety & Environment Management And ISO 14001 In Shell Canada:; Addressing Increasing Public Expectations In Exploration, Development, And Operations
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Shell Canada Limited has become the first integrated oil and gas company in Canada to register all its key operating facilities to the requirements of the international standard ISO 14001. The registrations also include Shell's onshore well construction and geophysical operations activities. The ISO 14001 sets guidelines for excellence in environmental management. One of the reasons Shell chose to register to the requirements of ISO 14001 was to address the increasing societal expectations on oil and gas exploration, development, and operations. It is no longer acceptable to tell the public and other stakeholders that the company is doing things properly with respect to health, safety, and the environment. We now must "show them", and "engage them". Proper consideration to "showing" and "engaging" the public is becoming part of the license to do business. This presentation will discuss what the ISO 14001 international standard requires, what Shell Canada's E&P business is doing to meet the Standard, and what this means for Shell Canada and their stakeholders. The presentation will discuss the various business processes and activities Shell utilizes as part of its HSE Management System to ensure proper management and control of all health, safety and environmental risks and concerns, and to address public issues. This includes Shell's HSE Assessment process for all new and existing activities, the Public Consultation Process, Contractor Management, and HSE Objectives and Targets setting process. Background Society's expectations of big corporations are changing. These expectations include the need for safe places to live and work, a healthy environment, environmental protection, conservation of biodiversity, clean air and water, and a reasonable rate of return on investment. Public confidence in large corporations is at a low ebb. Companies must do more than tell people what they are doing to meet these expectations. They must show them. In the past decade there have been many issues that the oil and gas industry has needed to address. Flaring has moved from being an environmental issue in the mid 1990's, to one of human and animal health. Global climate change has drawn significant national and international attention. Locally, issues of land use and the creation of new access in wilderness areas are of great concern. Recently, water supplies and usage have become significant issues in Alberta. Stakeholders of all types are demanding increased engagement and participation in the decision making process at the exploration, development and operation stage. The implications for the oil and gas industry are critical. Continuing to have access to explore and develop hydrocarbon resources is becoming a major issue for the industry. Shell Canada is striving to meet these changing expectations. In 1990 Shell adopted a formal policy and management system on sustainable development. Since then it has been working to integrate the economic, environmental, and social considerations of sustainable development into the Company's day-to-day business activities. This has been an evolutionary process. In recent years the most powerful addition to Shell's understanding of sustainable development has been the identification of the need for transparency in the Company's policies, plans, and performance.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».