MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4249227866 · doi:10.2979/victorianstudies.59.3.40

[sans titre]

2017· article· W4249227866 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAustralian History and Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEmigrationNewspaperScholarshipHistoryEmpirePrint cultureColonialismIdeologyPoetryLiteratureSociologyMedia studiesLawPolitical scienceArtArt historyAncient historyPolitics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: British Settler Emigration in Print, 1832–1877 by Jude Piesse Jason R. Rudy (bio) British Settler Emigration in Print, 1832–1877, by Jude Piesse; pp. vii + 219. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, £55.00, $100.00. A welcome addition to emerging scholarship about British settler colonialism, British Settler Emigration in Print, 1832–1877 examines the significant role newspaper publications played in mediating ideas about Victorian emigration. Most nineteenth-century English citizens contemplating emigration would have been informed by the news articles, short stories, poems, and serialized novels that regularly engaged with the topic. These texts, Jude Piesse argues, shaped the way prospective emigrants imagined the voyage out and their future lives in the colonies. Piesse focuses on the period immediately preceding Britain’s late-century turn to more rambunctious forms of imperialism. The emigrants she considers were responding to “unemployment, overpopulation, poverty, and the desire for social mobility” rather than the imperialist “ideologies that shaped later modes of thinking about empire” (10). They were also looking for assurances that leaving Britain was not akin to abandoning their own culture and identity. I was most persuaded by Piesse’s attention to the formal mechanisms governing periodical writing about emigration. In a chapter on serial novels, for example, Piesse suggests that the experience of “delay[ing] gratification” across multiple issues of a journal, as readers eagerly awaited the arrival of new installments, was a model of “gradualist values” for those contemplating emigration (88). Anticipating a new installment, in other words, may have taught prospective emigrants to think of progress as incremental and slow—a useful lesson for those embarking for the colonies. Piesse uses Christmas-themed fiction as another formal marker of emigrant literature. Popular both in England and abroad, Christmas stories encouraged emigrants and prospective emigrants to imagine “a sense of national synchronicity”—a feeling that, no [End Page 561] matter where one was located geographically, one might experience the feelings associated with an English Christmas (54). For example, Piesse shows the Illustrated London News in 1850 positioning a story about “Christmas Eve in Devonshire” alongside a poem about “The Emigrant’s Home,” suggesting implicitly a connection between the two (52). With a kind of wild optimism, the journal suggests that no matter where an English person wanders, she may still experience the pleasure of an “English hearthside” at Christmas (54). Here, as elsewhere in this study, the focus remains primarily on periodicals produced in England, with less attention to colonial publications. English periodicals circulated in the colonies, as Piesse notes, so emigrants abroad would have had exposure to the Illustrated London News and other English journals. But whether settlers in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada actually thought about synchronicity in the way Piesse suggests cannot be determined from publications based in the mother country alone. Future work might turn to the colonial press itself, which was robust by the midcentury, and to writers who personally experienced emigration. This last point is important, because what emerges through British Settler Emigration in Print are narratives about settlers written by those who were distinctly not emigrants. Anthony Trollope visited Australia twice, but he never contemplated living there permanently. Piesse rightly shows that Trollope’s story “Harry Heathcote of Gangoil” (1874), published simultaneously in the London Graphic and the Melbourne Age, was lampooned by Australians for its “dubiousness of … geographical knowledge” (71). Similarly, Eliza Meteyard’s “Lucy Dean: The Noble Needlewoman” (1850) offers a “radically domestic” view of colonial Australia, but Meteyard herself was born in Liverpool and died in London (126). Whereas English periodicals aiming to encourage emigration pictured idealized emigrant homes, those who lived in the colonies were more apt to be critical. Richard H. Horne, for example, whose 1870 “Christmas on the Australian Gold-Fields” was “one of the few texts of its type with a sustained diggings setting,” was able to offer this alternate perspective after having lived for more than a decade in the Victorian colony, part of which was spent in a mining camp (Piesse does not address Horne’s biographical connections to Australia) (77). The colonial perspective would, I think, often challenge the English standpoint that almost entirely governs Piesse’s study...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,469
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0890,019
Communication savante0,0020,005
Science ouverte0,0040,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,140
Tête enseignante GPT0,409
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle