MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[no title]

2017· article· W4249227866 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jason R. Rudy

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmigrationNewspaperScholarshipHistoryEmpirePrint cultureColonialismIdeologyPoetryLiteratureSociologyMedia studiesLawPolitical scienceArtArt historyAncient historyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: British Settler Emigration in Print, 1832–1877 by Jude Piesse Jason R. Rudy (bio) British Settler Emigration in Print, 1832–1877, by Jude Piesse; pp. vii + 219. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2016, £55.00, $100.00. A welcome addition to emerging scholarship about British settler colonialism, British Settler Emigration in Print, 1832–1877 examines the significant role newspaper publications played in mediating ideas about Victorian emigration. Most nineteenth-century English citizens contemplating emigration would have been informed by the news articles, short stories, poems, and serialized novels that regularly engaged with the topic. These texts, Jude Piesse argues, shaped the way prospective emigrants imagined the voyage out and their future lives in the colonies. Piesse focuses on the period immediately preceding Britain’s late-century turn to more rambunctious forms of imperialism. The emigrants she considers were responding to “unemployment, overpopulation, poverty, and the desire for social mobility” rather than the imperialist “ideologies that shaped later modes of thinking about empire” (10). They were also looking for assurances that leaving Britain was not akin to abandoning their own culture and identity. I was most persuaded by Piesse’s attention to the formal mechanisms governing periodical writing about emigration. In a chapter on serial novels, for example, Piesse suggests that the experience of “delay[ing] gratification” across multiple issues of a journal, as readers eagerly awaited the arrival of new installments, was a model of “gradualist values” for those contemplating emigration (88). Anticipating a new installment, in other words, may have taught prospective emigrants to think of progress as incremental and slow—a useful lesson for those embarking for the colonies. Piesse uses Christmas-themed fiction as another formal marker of emigrant literature. Popular both in England and abroad, Christmas stories encouraged emigrants and prospective emigrants to imagine “a sense of national synchronicity”—a feeling that, no [End Page 561] matter where one was located geographically, one might experience the feelings associated with an English Christmas (54). For example, Piesse shows the Illustrated London News in 1850 positioning a story about “Christmas Eve in Devonshire” alongside a poem about “The Emigrant’s Home,” suggesting implicitly a connection between the two (52). With a kind of wild optimism, the journal suggests that no matter where an English person wanders, she may still experience the pleasure of an “English hearthside” at Christmas (54). Here, as elsewhere in this study, the focus remains primarily on periodicals produced in England, with less attention to colonial publications. English periodicals circulated in the colonies, as Piesse notes, so emigrants abroad would have had exposure to the Illustrated London News and other English journals. But whether settlers in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada actually thought about synchronicity in the way Piesse suggests cannot be determined from publications based in the mother country alone. Future work might turn to the colonial press itself, which was robust by the midcentury, and to writers who personally experienced emigration. This last point is important, because what emerges through British Settler Emigration in Print are narratives about settlers written by those who were distinctly not emigrants. Anthony Trollope visited Australia twice, but he never contemplated living there permanently. Piesse rightly shows that Trollope’s story “Harry Heathcote of Gangoil” (1874), published simultaneously in the London Graphic and the Melbourne Age, was lampooned by Australians for its “dubiousness of … geographical knowledge” (71). Similarly, Eliza Meteyard’s “Lucy Dean: The Noble Needlewoman” (1850) offers a “radically domestic” view of colonial Australia, but Meteyard herself was born in Liverpool and died in London (126). Whereas English periodicals aiming to encourage emigration pictured idealized emigrant homes, those who lived in the colonies were more apt to be critical. Richard H. Horne, for example, whose 1870 “Christmas on the Australian Gold-Fields” was “one of the few texts of its type with a sustained diggings setting,” was able to offer this alternate perspective after having lived for more than a decade in the Victorian colony, part of which was spent in a mining camp (Piesse does not address Horne’s biographical connections to Australia) (77). The colonial perspective would, I think, often challenge the English standpoint that almost entirely governs Piesse’s study...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7300.667

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian StudiesSame topicAustralian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207