MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4249578294 · doi:10.1097/01.hj.0000285778.45372.9c

Oh, Canada!

2005· article· en· W4249578294 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David H. Kirkwood

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Hearing Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDiverse Musicological Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConventionHavenFront (military)Political scienceHistoryLawSociologyGeography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Figure. David: H. KirkwoodIn speaking and communicating by e-mail with International Hearing Society members recently, I've been picking up on an unusual amount of excitement about its 2005 Convention, which starts October 19. What's driving a lot of it is the bold choice of venue for the organization's 54th annual gathering. In case, you haven't noticed, it will take place in Canada—Quebec City, Quebec, to be exact. This is probably a good time for me to be up front about my prejudices. I am an American born and raised. But, for the first 15 years or so of my life, my father was a Canadian, until he finally got tired of being unable to vote in the country he had lived in for nearly 25 years. All through my childhood, we regularly visited relatives in that country. To this day, most of my cousins reside in various parts of the United States' larger neighbor to the north. (Yes, larger. You can look it up.) Anyway, maybe all this is what makes me think it's a great idea for IHS to hold a meeting in Canada—not to mention in one of the most charming cities in that country or any other. But, I don't think so. Frankly, it seems to me—and to a lot of Canadian and also U.S. members of IHS—that it's about time! After all, it was in 1991 that the organization added International to its name (it used to be the National Hearing Aid Society). So, you might ask, what took IHS so long to live up to its name? What's more, there is always a large and active contingent of Canadians at the annual meetings, so it seems only fair that they have a chance to host this meeting from time to time. It may also prove a good decision from an attendance standpoint. Advance reports indicate that there will be an extraordinarily large turnout of Canadian members, as well as more than 200 acousticians from Quebec, very few of whom belong to IHS (yet) or have ever attended an IHS meeting. WHO'S NEXT? I don't want to sound critical of IHS. After all, while it took a long time, the organization was finally ready to look outside the borders of this country. The organization's leaders, past and present, deserve to be praised for their decision. By comparison, the other professional organizations in hearing healthcare seem a bit provincial in terms of their meeting sites. True, a few old-timers will point out that the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) did hold its annual convention in Toronto once. But that was in 1982; surely Canada is overdue for another turn. In fairness, I'm willing to give the Academy of Dispensing Audiologists (ADA) a pass. No, not because its 1999 meeting was in Bermuda. While Bermuda is a pretty place with friendly people, it's not a country at all, but rather a British territory with a population half the size of Peoria. The reason for excusing ADA is that it makes no claim to be an international organization and it has only a handful of members from outside the U.S. However, the American Academy of Audiology (AAA) is another matter. It is the most important audiology organization in the world, and its annual convention attracts a large number of international attendees. While its membership is primarily American, it does include a few hundred audiologists from other countries. Among them are about 150 Canadians, including some of the profession's leading lights. So, perhaps one of these years, AAA will follow IHS's lead and schedule a meeting in Canada (or another country). It won't be anytime soon, as it has selected U.S. locations for its conventions through 2010. But, when and if AAA finally decides the time has come to expand its horizons and fully accept its role as the world leader in audiology, it will find that Canada offers some great host cities, including Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver. Who knows, if AAA waits long enough and global warming continues, Whitehorse in the Yukon Territory, may be an attractive choice. But, until then, let me join my fellow Canada-enthusiasts (and Canadians) in congratulating IHS and urging its members and other hearing professionals to make its convention in Quebec City a great success.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,786
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,146
Tête enseignante GPT0,219
Écart entre enseignants0,073 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Hearing JournalMême sujetDiverse Musicological StudiesTravaux en français237 207