MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Oh, Canada!

2005· article· en· W4249578294 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David H. Kirkwood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Hearing Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiverse Musicological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConventionHavenFront (military)Political scienceHistoryLawSociologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Figure. David: H. KirkwoodIn speaking and communicating by e-mail with International Hearing Society members recently, I've been picking up on an unusual amount of excitement about its 2005 Convention, which starts October 19. What's driving a lot of it is the bold choice of venue for the organization's 54th annual gathering. In case, you haven't noticed, it will take place in Canada—Quebec City, Quebec, to be exact. This is probably a good time for me to be up front about my prejudices. I am an American born and raised. But, for the first 15 years or so of my life, my father was a Canadian, until he finally got tired of being unable to vote in the country he had lived in for nearly 25 years. All through my childhood, we regularly visited relatives in that country. To this day, most of my cousins reside in various parts of the United States' larger neighbor to the north. (Yes, larger. You can look it up.) Anyway, maybe all this is what makes me think it's a great idea for IHS to hold a meeting in Canada—not to mention in one of the most charming cities in that country or any other. But, I don't think so. Frankly, it seems to me—and to a lot of Canadian and also U.S. members of IHS—that it's about time! After all, it was in 1991 that the organization added International to its name (it used to be the National Hearing Aid Society). So, you might ask, what took IHS so long to live up to its name? What's more, there is always a large and active contingent of Canadians at the annual meetings, so it seems only fair that they have a chance to host this meeting from time to time. It may also prove a good decision from an attendance standpoint. Advance reports indicate that there will be an extraordinarily large turnout of Canadian members, as well as more than 200 acousticians from Quebec, very few of whom belong to IHS (yet) or have ever attended an IHS meeting. WHO'S NEXT? I don't want to sound critical of IHS. After all, while it took a long time, the organization was finally ready to look outside the borders of this country. The organization's leaders, past and present, deserve to be praised for their decision. By comparison, the other professional organizations in hearing healthcare seem a bit provincial in terms of their meeting sites. True, a few old-timers will point out that the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) did hold its annual convention in Toronto once. But that was in 1982; surely Canada is overdue for another turn. In fairness, I'm willing to give the Academy of Dispensing Audiologists (ADA) a pass. No, not because its 1999 meeting was in Bermuda. While Bermuda is a pretty place with friendly people, it's not a country at all, but rather a British territory with a population half the size of Peoria. The reason for excusing ADA is that it makes no claim to be an international organization and it has only a handful of members from outside the U.S. However, the American Academy of Audiology (AAA) is another matter. It is the most important audiology organization in the world, and its annual convention attracts a large number of international attendees. While its membership is primarily American, it does include a few hundred audiologists from other countries. Among them are about 150 Canadians, including some of the profession's leading lights. So, perhaps one of these years, AAA will follow IHS's lead and schedule a meeting in Canada (or another country). It won't be anytime soon, as it has selected U.S. locations for its conventions through 2010. But, when and if AAA finally decides the time has come to expand its horizons and fully accept its role as the world leader in audiology, it will find that Canada offers some great host cities, including Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver. Who knows, if AAA waits long enough and global warming continues, Whitehorse in the Yukon Territory, may be an attractive choice. But, until then, let me join my fellow Canada-enthusiasts (and Canadians) in congratulating IHS and urging its members and other hearing professionals to make its convention in Quebec City a great success.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.073 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Hearing JournalSame topicDiverse Musicological StudiesFrench-language works237,207