MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4249952091 · doi:10.2979/victorianstudies.57.2.330

[sans titre]

2015· article· W4249952091 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Langue
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCivilizationConfession (law)ArchitecturePoliticsEmpireHistoryHavenGospelBritish EmpireSociologyAncient historyClassicsLawArchaeologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Imperial Gothic: Religious Architecture and High Anglican Culture in the British Empire, c. 1840–1870 by G. A. Bremner Margaret M. Grubiak (bio) Imperial Gothic: Religious Architecture and High Anglican Culture in the British Empire, c. 1840–1870, by G. A. Bremner; pp. xv + 484. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012, $95.00. When a devastating earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand brought down the spire of the Gothic revival Christ Church Cathedral in 2011, it damaged not just a beloved local landmark but also one of “the most perfect symbols of the reach and ambition of the Anglican confession worldwide” (364). In Imperial Gothic—wide-ranging in scope, lavishly adorned with nearly 400 images, and challenging in its marrying of architectural, religious, political, and cultural history in a global perspective—G. A. Bremner traces the coordinated effort by the Church of England in the mid-nineteenth century to spread the gospel and attendant membership in British civilization across the Empire. Architecture, Bremner argues, was a key tool “used extensively and very deliberately by Anglican clergymen to promote the influence, authority and integrity of their confession and its distinctive values and ideals” in a strategy that was “as much political as it was spiritual” (366). That the thirty years of the Church of England’s growth abroad from 1840 to 1870 coincided with the reform efforts of the Cambridge Camden (later Ecclesiological) and Oxford Architectural Societies, which championed the Gothic revival and liturgical reforms across the British world, makes Bremner’s designation of “Imperial Gothic” an apt descriptor of this critical period in colonial Anglicanism. Just how closely the Church of England was tied to Britain’s colonial reach is captured brilliantly in Thomas Jones Baker’s The Secret of England’s Greatness (1863), a painting of Queen Victoria, head of both church and state, presenting a bible to an African man, a representative of the non-Europeans the British Empire would encompass. While Bremner is careful to note that the Church of England was not an extension of the state, they nevertheless had shared interests. The purpose of the Church abroad, visualized in its buildings, was no less than to secure the British Empire and civilization, for if indigenous peoples and British settlers were “inculcated with the tenets of the true faith then their inclination would be to sympathise with the national character of that faith, in effect contributing to the creation of a pan-global Anglican polity” (4). That national character was “the orthodox, tempered and patriarchal brand of English civilisation represented by the Anglican faith” (226). While the Church of England was not alone in the colonies—Low Church and Roman Catholic missionaries competed with High Church Anglicanism—the creation of the Colonial Bishoprics’ Fund in 1841 and the work of the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts helped to systematize the spread of the Church of England around the globe and to make it a major force. Bremner innovatively recovers the key role clergymen played in this spread of British identity and culture through architecture. He shows how the social and professional networks of these clergymen—many of whom were Oxbridge-educated and members or friends of the Cambridge Camden and Oxford Architectural Societies—brought the architectural reforms of Anglican ecclesiology to places as diverse as Calcutta, Cape Town, Ottawa, and Sydney. Anglican clergymen such as Bishops George Selwyn in New Zealand, William Broughton in Australia, and John Medley in Canada drew on architectural models—whether three-dimensional, rendered on paper, or described by word—and images published in The Ecclesiologist, which devoted [End Page 330] more than 250 articles to colonial church architecture. Like Selwyn, many became builder-architects themselves out of necessity and even principle, and others engaged major British architects such as G. F. Bodley, William Burgess, William Butterfield, and G. G. Scott. Clergymen were the keystone of a coherent Anglican ecclesiology in the British colonies during the Victorian era. In this book Bremner poses the methodological challenge to unify the study of British domestic architecture with that of British colonial architecture, where previously these two have been considered independently. Bremner’s claim is that architectural influence worked...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,526
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,004
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,372
Tête enseignante GPT0,368
Écart entre enseignants0,004 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle