MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[no title]

2015· article· W4249952091 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Grubiak

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchitecture and Cultural Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilizationConfession (law)ArchitecturePoliticsEmpireHistoryHavenGospelBritish EmpireSociologyAncient historyClassicsLawArchaeologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Imperial Gothic: Religious Architecture and High Anglican Culture in the British Empire, c. 1840–1870 by G. A. Bremner Margaret M. Grubiak (bio) Imperial Gothic: Religious Architecture and High Anglican Culture in the British Empire, c. 1840–1870, by G. A. Bremner; pp. xv + 484. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012, $95.00. When a devastating earthquake in Christchurch, New Zealand brought down the spire of the Gothic revival Christ Church Cathedral in 2011, it damaged not just a beloved local landmark but also one of “the most perfect symbols of the reach and ambition of the Anglican confession worldwide” (364). In Imperial Gothic—wide-ranging in scope, lavishly adorned with nearly 400 images, and challenging in its marrying of architectural, religious, political, and cultural history in a global perspective—G. A. Bremner traces the coordinated effort by the Church of England in the mid-nineteenth century to spread the gospel and attendant membership in British civilization across the Empire. Architecture, Bremner argues, was a key tool “used extensively and very deliberately by Anglican clergymen to promote the influence, authority and integrity of their confession and its distinctive values and ideals” in a strategy that was “as much political as it was spiritual” (366). That the thirty years of the Church of England’s growth abroad from 1840 to 1870 coincided with the reform efforts of the Cambridge Camden (later Ecclesiological) and Oxford Architectural Societies, which championed the Gothic revival and liturgical reforms across the British world, makes Bremner’s designation of “Imperial Gothic” an apt descriptor of this critical period in colonial Anglicanism. Just how closely the Church of England was tied to Britain’s colonial reach is captured brilliantly in Thomas Jones Baker’s The Secret of England’s Greatness (1863), a painting of Queen Victoria, head of both church and state, presenting a bible to an African man, a representative of the non-Europeans the British Empire would encompass. While Bremner is careful to note that the Church of England was not an extension of the state, they nevertheless had shared interests. The purpose of the Church abroad, visualized in its buildings, was no less than to secure the British Empire and civilization, for if indigenous peoples and British settlers were “inculcated with the tenets of the true faith then their inclination would be to sympathise with the national character of that faith, in effect contributing to the creation of a pan-global Anglican polity” (4). That national character was “the orthodox, tempered and patriarchal brand of English civilisation represented by the Anglican faith” (226). While the Church of England was not alone in the colonies—Low Church and Roman Catholic missionaries competed with High Church Anglicanism—the creation of the Colonial Bishoprics’ Fund in 1841 and the work of the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts helped to systematize the spread of the Church of England around the globe and to make it a major force. Bremner innovatively recovers the key role clergymen played in this spread of British identity and culture through architecture. He shows how the social and professional networks of these clergymen—many of whom were Oxbridge-educated and members or friends of the Cambridge Camden and Oxford Architectural Societies—brought the architectural reforms of Anglican ecclesiology to places as diverse as Calcutta, Cape Town, Ottawa, and Sydney. Anglican clergymen such as Bishops George Selwyn in New Zealand, William Broughton in Australia, and John Medley in Canada drew on architectural models—whether three-dimensional, rendered on paper, or described by word—and images published in The Ecclesiologist, which devoted [End Page 330] more than 250 articles to colonial church architecture. Like Selwyn, many became builder-architects themselves out of necessity and even principle, and others engaged major British architects such as G. F. Bodley, William Burgess, William Butterfield, and G. G. Scott. Clergymen were the keystone of a coherent Anglican ecclesiology in the British colonies during the Victorian era. In this book Bremner poses the methodological challenge to unify the study of British domestic architecture with that of British colonial architecture, where previously these two have been considered independently. Bremner’s claim is that architectural influence worked...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7920.758

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.372
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.004 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian StudiesSame topicArchitecture and Cultural InfluencesFrench-language works237,207