Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Negotiating Transcultural Lives, Belongings and Social Capital among Youth in Comparative Perspective presents 12 chapters of independent and co-researched studies by established researchers and graduate students designed to collect and analyze issues of concern to youth and their agency in the world they live.What is evident in these studies is that with globalization the circumstances of many young people cannot be captured by the terms mutlticultural or bicultural; rather, transculturalism and transnationalism better names their complex realities.Moreover as the studies indicate, in negotiating their transcultural lives, youth are finding new sociocultural and cognitive spaces to inhabit, Framed by historical perspectives, these studies present current circumstances and future possibilities that might help us better understand the ways in which youth are moving and negotiating themselves in the new and multiple spaces they are creating.Negotiating Transcultural Lives is organized into three sections: 1) Settings: Cultural, Emotional, Generational; 2) Multiple Belongings in Canada and Europe; and 3) Social Capital, Cultural Capital, and Transcultural Lives.The research themes are applicable to each other and issues from one study are picked up by others that carry it on where the first left off.This allows the book to present a broad spectrum of issues and provide a wide perspective for understanding the complexities of youth's lives.The first section, Settings: Cultural, Emotional, Generational, addresses comparative issues of immigration and integration policies and patterns of identification among migrant youth in Germany, France, and Great Britain.Different sources contributed immigrant populations such as former colonies holding passports, easy citizenship, or recruited guest-workers, and national integration approaches like French republicanism, British multiculturalism, or German ethnic nation influenced the different migrant experiences.As noted in the chapters in this section,Germany has refused to identify itself as a country of immigration so migrants and their children remained foreigners with limited political rights and very few were allowed naturalized citizenship status.France's assimilation policy and historical nation-building refused to recognize any special policies for categories of minorities or races.However, they differed in some actual social practices such as educational concerns for immigrant children.Great Britain's integration policies regarding ethnic and racial categories have been criticized for perpetuating race and ethnicity as social disadvantage and discrimination.Current policies and measures are grappling with similar problems in redesigning nationalist policies of the 1960s and 1970s that approached immigrant settlements as temporary.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,441 | 0,343 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; l’étiquette directe de Gemma et le classifieur distillé Codex s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».