Bibliographic record
Abstract
Negotiating Transcultural Lives, Belongings and Social Capital among Youth in Comparative Perspective presents 12 chapters of independent and co-researched studies by established researchers and graduate students designed to collect and analyze issues of concern to youth and their agency in the world they live.What is evident in these studies is that with globalization the circumstances of many young people cannot be captured by the terms mutlticultural or bicultural; rather, transculturalism and transnationalism better names their complex realities.Moreover as the studies indicate, in negotiating their transcultural lives, youth are finding new sociocultural and cognitive spaces to inhabit, Framed by historical perspectives, these studies present current circumstances and future possibilities that might help us better understand the ways in which youth are moving and negotiating themselves in the new and multiple spaces they are creating.Negotiating Transcultural Lives is organized into three sections: 1) Settings: Cultural, Emotional, Generational; 2) Multiple Belongings in Canada and Europe; and 3) Social Capital, Cultural Capital, and Transcultural Lives.The research themes are applicable to each other and issues from one study are picked up by others that carry it on where the first left off.This allows the book to present a broad spectrum of issues and provide a wide perspective for understanding the complexities of youth's lives.The first section, Settings: Cultural, Emotional, Generational, addresses comparative issues of immigration and integration policies and patterns of identification among migrant youth in Germany, France, and Great Britain.Different sources contributed immigrant populations such as former colonies holding passports, easy citizenship, or recruited guest-workers, and national integration approaches like French republicanism, British multiculturalism, or German ethnic nation influenced the different migrant experiences.As noted in the chapters in this section,Germany has refused to identify itself as a country of immigration so migrants and their children remained foreigners with limited political rights and very few were allowed naturalized citizenship status.France's assimilation policy and historical nation-building refused to recognize any special policies for categories of minorities or races.However, they differed in some actual social practices such as educational concerns for immigrant children.Great Britain's integration policies regarding ethnic and racial categories have been criticized for perpetuating race and ethnicity as social disadvantage and discrimination.Current policies and measures are grappling with similar problems in redesigning nationalist policies of the 1960s and 1970s that approached immigrant settlements as temporary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.441 | 0.343 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".