Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM): Final Results of Phase I/II MMRC Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 1937 Background: Three-drug combinations with bortezomib (Bz) and/or either thalidomide or lenalidomide (Len) are highly active in frontline MM and appear superior to at least some 2-drug combinations with these agents. In an attempt to further improve treatment outcomes, we developed the 4-drug RVDD regimen of lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Len), Bz (Velcade®), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil®, PLD), and dexamethasone (Dex), which demonstrates high activity in newly diagnosed MM. Here we present final results of this Phase I/II trial. Methods: Patients (Pts) received eight 3-week cycles with Len 15–25 mg (days 1–14), Bz 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, 11), Dex 20/10 mg (cycles 1–4/5-8; days of and after Bz), PLD 20 or 30 mg/m2 (day 4) at 4 dose levels and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD; Phase II). Responses were assessed by modified EBMT and IMWG criteria with the addition of nCR. Pts could proceed to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or continue treatment, which after 8 cycles consisted of 21-day maintenance cycles with Len (days 1–14), Bz (day 1 and 8), and Dex (days of and after Bz) at the doses tolerated by the end of initial treatment. The primary objectives were to evaluate MTD and VGPR rate at the end of 4 and 8 cycles. Results: The study enrolled 72 pts with a median age 60 (range 29–77); 53% ISS II/III; 46% any of the del 13q, t(4;14), t(14;16), or del 17p, of which 37 were treated at the MTD (including 6 in Phase I). Pts received a median of 4.5 cycles (range 2–31); 70 pts completed at least 4 cycles and 20 at least 8 cycles. Five pts developed DLTs, including 2 pts grade (G) 3 asymptomatic neutropenia, 1 G3 elevation of transaminases, 1 G3 drug fever, and 1 G3 hypophosphatemia. Based on the pre-determined definition of MTD, the maximum planned doses of Len 25 mg, Bz 1.3 mg/m2, PLD 30 mg/m2, and Dex 20/10 mg were selected as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the Phase II portion of the study as the closest to, but not exceeding, a target rate of 20% DLTs. The most common toxicities (all grades) were fatigue (83%), infections (72%), constipation (69%), and sensory neuropathy (65%) of which 8%, 14%, 1%, and 6% were G3, respectively. Other G3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (19%), infections (16 %), thrombocytopenia (11%), hyperglycemia (10%), and DVT/PE (3%). There was 25% G1/2 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and 1 pt experienced G1 asymptomatic and reversible decrease in ejection fraction attributed to PLD. Importantly, there was no treatment-related mortality. The best response rates for all pts were as follows: 96% ≥ PR, 66% ≥ VGPR, and 38% CR/nCR. At the end of 4 and 8 cycles, defined in the protocol for efficacy assessment, response rates were: 96% and 95% ≥ PR, 57% and 65% ≥VGPR and 29% and 35% CR/nCR; at the MTD ≥PR was 96%, ≥VGPR 66%, and CR/nCR 34%. Response rates were not statistically different in a subset of pts with any of del 13q, t(4;14), t(14;16), or del 17p. Forty-seven (65%) pts proceeded to ASCT, after collection of a median 6.7 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.9–17.7). At 3 months post ASCT, ≥ VGPR and CR/nCR rates improved in 45 evaluable pts from 64% to 84% and from 38% to 60%, respectively. After a median of 15.5 months of follow-up, the estimated 18-month PFS for all pts is 84% and overall survival 99%. Conclusion: RVDD is generally well tolerated and highly active with rapid reduction of MM tumor burden seen (≥ PR 96%, ≥VGPR 57% and CR/nCR rate 29% at the completion of 4 cycles). Response rates further improved after additional treatment, both in pts who continued RVDD treatment (’VGPR 65%, CR/nCR 35%) and pts who proceeded to ASCT (≥VGPR 84%, and CR/nCR 60%), although some additional toxicity was noted. Whether the incorporation of a 4th agent in the form of PLD has made an impact in this pt population remains to be defined. At equivalent time points (i.e. at the completion of 4 and 8 cycles), the ≥VGPR and CR/nCR rates as well as the current estimated PFS appear to compare favorably to RVD, which provides the rationale for consideration of further studies with this regimen, including potential randomized trials in this setting. Disclosures: Jakubowiak: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Centocor OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Reece:Celgene: Unrestricted educational lectures, research funding, ad hoc advisory boards. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Zimmerman:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Campagnaro:NIH: Research funding for NIH K12 CA076917. Raje:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding. Anderson:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barrickman:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tendler:Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Services: Employment, Equity Ownership. Esseltine:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Equity Ownership. Richardson:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».