MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, and Dexamethasone In Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM): Final Results of Phase I/II MMRC Trial

2010· article· en· W4250653753 on OpenAlexaff
Andrzej Jakubowiak, Donna Reece, Craig C. Hofmeister, Sagar Lonial, Todd M. Zimmerman, Erica Campagnaro, Robert Schlossman, Jacob P. Laubach, Noopur Raje, Tara Anderson, Kent A. Griffith, Melissa A. Hill, Colleen K Harvey, Sandra Wear, Jennifer Barrickman, Craig Tendler, Dixie‐Lee Esseltine, Susan L. Kelley, Mark Kaminski, Kenneth C. Anderson, Paul G. Richardson

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLenalidomideThalidomideMedicineBortezomibDexamethasoneRegimenMultiple myelomaInternal medicineMelphalanPhases of clinical researchUrologyGastroenterologySurgeryPharmacologyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1937 Background: Three-drug combinations with bortezomib (Bz) and/or either thalidomide or lenalidomide (Len) are highly active in frontline MM and appear superior to at least some 2-drug combinations with these agents. In an attempt to further improve treatment outcomes, we developed the 4-drug RVDD regimen of lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Len), Bz (Velcade®), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil®, PLD), and dexamethasone (Dex), which demonstrates high activity in newly diagnosed MM. Here we present final results of this Phase I/II trial. Methods: Patients (Pts) received eight 3-week cycles with Len 15–25 mg (days 1–14), Bz 1.3 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, 11), Dex 20/10 mg (cycles 1–4/5-8; days of and after Bz), PLD 20 or 30 mg/m2 (day 4) at 4 dose levels and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD; Phase II). Responses were assessed by modified EBMT and IMWG criteria with the addition of nCR. Pts could proceed to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or continue treatment, which after 8 cycles consisted of 21-day maintenance cycles with Len (days 1–14), Bz (day 1 and 8), and Dex (days of and after Bz) at the doses tolerated by the end of initial treatment. The primary objectives were to evaluate MTD and VGPR rate at the end of 4 and 8 cycles. Results: The study enrolled 72 pts with a median age 60 (range 29–77); 53% ISS II/III; 46% any of the del 13q, t(4;14), t(14;16), or del 17p, of which 37 were treated at the MTD (including 6 in Phase I). Pts received a median of 4.5 cycles (range 2–31); 70 pts completed at least 4 cycles and 20 at least 8 cycles. Five pts developed DLTs, including 2 pts grade (G) 3 asymptomatic neutropenia, 1 G3 elevation of transaminases, 1 G3 drug fever, and 1 G3 hypophosphatemia. Based on the pre-determined definition of MTD, the maximum planned doses of Len 25 mg, Bz 1.3 mg/m2, PLD 30 mg/m2, and Dex 20/10 mg were selected as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the Phase II portion of the study as the closest to, but not exceeding, a target rate of 20% DLTs. The most common toxicities (all grades) were fatigue (83%), infections (72%), constipation (69%), and sensory neuropathy (65%) of which 8%, 14%, 1%, and 6% were G3, respectively. Other G3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (19%), infections (16 %), thrombocytopenia (11%), hyperglycemia (10%), and DVT/PE (3%). There was 25% G1/2 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and 1 pt experienced G1 asymptomatic and reversible decrease in ejection fraction attributed to PLD. Importantly, there was no treatment-related mortality. The best response rates for all pts were as follows: 96% ≥ PR, 66% ≥ VGPR, and 38% CR/nCR. At the end of 4 and 8 cycles, defined in the protocol for efficacy assessment, response rates were: 96% and 95% ≥ PR, 57% and 65% ≥VGPR and 29% and 35% CR/nCR; at the MTD ≥PR was 96%, ≥VGPR 66%, and CR/nCR 34%. Response rates were not statistically different in a subset of pts with any of del 13q, t(4;14), t(14;16), or del 17p. Forty-seven (65%) pts proceeded to ASCT, after collection of a median 6.7 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range 1.9–17.7). At 3 months post ASCT, ≥ VGPR and CR/nCR rates improved in 45 evaluable pts from 64% to 84% and from 38% to 60%, respectively. After a median of 15.5 months of follow-up, the estimated 18-month PFS for all pts is 84% and overall survival 99%. Conclusion: RVDD is generally well tolerated and highly active with rapid reduction of MM tumor burden seen (≥ PR 96%, ≥VGPR 57% and CR/nCR rate 29% at the completion of 4 cycles). Response rates further improved after additional treatment, both in pts who continued RVDD treatment (’VGPR 65%, CR/nCR 35%) and pts who proceeded to ASCT (≥VGPR 84%, and CR/nCR 60%), although some additional toxicity was noted. Whether the incorporation of a 4th agent in the form of PLD has made an impact in this pt population remains to be defined. At equivalent time points (i.e. at the completion of 4 and 8 cycles), the ≥VGPR and CR/nCR rates as well as the current estimated PFS appear to compare favorably to RVD, which provides the rationale for consideration of further studies with this regimen, including potential randomized trials in this setting. Disclosures: Jakubowiak: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Exelixis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Centocor OrthoBiotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Reece:Celgene: Unrestricted educational lectures, research funding, ad hoc advisory boards. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Zimmerman:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Campagnaro:NIH: Research funding for NIH K12 CA076917. Raje:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding. Anderson:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barrickman:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tendler:Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Services: Employment, Equity Ownership. Esseltine:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Employment; Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Equity Ownership. Richardson:Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→