Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The event attracted academic and legal experts from several countries, as well as representatives of some of the most relevant international institutions, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).I am honoured to have been invited by Christoph to write a foreword for the book that continues the scholarly work that was launched at that conference in a beautiful city in the Swiss mountains.In my own academic and professional career I have had to confront many of the issues that now concern the researchers, but in no sense can I profess to be an expert in the particular spheres of study that were addressed at the workshop and that are the subject of analysis in this book.The following observations are therefore offered for what they may be worth.As the nations of the world move into the twenty-first century, there is evidence that the interests of indigenous peoples are receiving increasing attention and concern from legislators and policy-makers.The contents of this book focus upon the particular interests that are subject to international trade and market concern and regulation.An accompanying development is the emergence of international standards that aim to define minimum standards to be followed by states in their relations with indigenous peoples.A third and critically important development has been the participation of indigenous peoples' representatives in the process of identifying their particular interests and articulating their significance to governmental and non-governmental bodies both at the state level and at the international level, a development that has contributed significantly to the first two developments.The reconciliation of the conflicting legitimate interests at stake in these developments, that is the interests of the indigenous peoples on the one hand and the interests of other parties which are mediated by state and international institutions on the other hand, requires the design and creation of processes or institutions that have the capacity to effect a reconciliation that is just, legitimate and workable.The advantages of a transdisciplinary cooperative methodology are applied by the various authors as they address questions the answers to which promise a material contribution to historic developments that engage some of the most arcane aspects of law and international relations and some of the most humanly significant aspects of the life of indigenous peoples.xvii
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,540 | 0,426 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».