Early administration of inhaled corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in ventilated very low birth weight preterm neonates
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Chronic lung disease remains a common complication among preterm infants. There is increasing evidence that inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of CLD. Due to their strong anti-inflammatory properties, corticosteroids are an attractive intervention strategy. However, there are growing concerns regarding short and long-term effects of systemic corticosteroids. Theoretically, administration of inhaled corticosteroids may allow for beneficial effects on the pulmonary system with a lower risk of undesirable systemic side effects. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of inhaled corticosteroids administered to ventilated very low birth weight preterm neonates in the first two weeks of life for the prevention of chronic lung disease (CLD). SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomized and quasi-randomized trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 - July 2007), EMBASE (1980 - July 2007), CINAHL (1982 - July 2007), reference lists of published trials and abstracts published in Pediatric Research or electronically on the Pediatric Academic Societies web-site (1990 - April 2007). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of inhaled corticosteroid therapy initiated within the first 2 weeks of life in ventilated preterm infants with birth weight <1500 grams were included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including chronic lung disease at 28 days or 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), mortality, combined outcome of death or CLD at 28 days of age and at 36 weeks PMA, the need for systemic corticosteroids, failure to extubate within 14 days and adverse effects of corticosteroids were evaluated. All data were analyzed using RevMan 4.2.10. When possible, meta-analysis was performed using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). If RD was significant, the number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated. MAIN RESULTS: Three additional trials were identified for inclusion in this update. Eleven trials assessing the impact of inhaled corticosteroid for the prevention of CLD were identified. Four trials were excluded. The present review includes data analyses based on seven qualifying trials. There was no statistically significant effect of inhaled steroids on CLD either at 28 days [typical RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.84, 1.32); typical RD 0.02 (95% CO -0.07, 0.11)] or at 36 weeks PMA [typical RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.62, 1.52); typical RD 0.00 (95% CI -0.07, 0.06)], when analyzed either for all randomized infants or among survivors. No statistically significant differences were noted for mortality or for the combined outcome of mortality and CLD either at 28 days of age or at 36 weeks PMA. There were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on this updated review, there is no evidence from the trials reviewed that early administration (in the first two weeks of life) of inhaled steroids to ventilated preterm neonates was effective in reducing the incidence of CLD. Currently, use of inhaled steroids in this population cannot be recommended. Studies are needed to identify the risk/benefit ratio of different delivery techniques and dosing schedules for the administration of these medications. Studies need to address both the short-term and long-term benefits and adverse effects of inhaled steroids with particular attention to neurodevelopmental outcome.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».