Early administration of inhaled corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in ventilated very low birth weight preterm neonates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic lung disease remains a common complication among preterm infants. There is increasing evidence that inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of CLD. Due to their strong anti-inflammatory properties, corticosteroids are an attractive intervention strategy. However, there are growing concerns regarding short and long-term effects of systemic corticosteroids. Theoretically, administration of inhaled corticosteroids may allow for beneficial effects on the pulmonary system with a lower risk of undesirable systemic side effects. OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of inhaled corticosteroids administered to ventilated very low birth weight preterm neonates in the first two weeks of life for the prevention of chronic lung disease (CLD). SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomized and quasi-randomized trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 - July 2007), EMBASE (1980 - July 2007), CINAHL (1982 - July 2007), reference lists of published trials and abstracts published in Pediatric Research or electronically on the Pediatric Academic Societies web-site (1990 - April 2007). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials of inhaled corticosteroid therapy initiated within the first 2 weeks of life in ventilated preterm infants with birth weight <1500 grams were included in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data regarding clinical outcomes including chronic lung disease at 28 days or 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), mortality, combined outcome of death or CLD at 28 days of age and at 36 weeks PMA, the need for systemic corticosteroids, failure to extubate within 14 days and adverse effects of corticosteroids were evaluated. All data were analyzed using RevMan 4.2.10. When possible, meta-analysis was performed using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), along with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). If RD was significant, the number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated. MAIN RESULTS: Three additional trials were identified for inclusion in this update. Eleven trials assessing the impact of inhaled corticosteroid for the prevention of CLD were identified. Four trials were excluded. The present review includes data analyses based on seven qualifying trials. There was no statistically significant effect of inhaled steroids on CLD either at 28 days [typical RR 1.05 (95% CI 0.84, 1.32); typical RD 0.02 (95% CO -0.07, 0.11)] or at 36 weeks PMA [typical RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.62, 1.52); typical RD 0.00 (95% CI -0.07, 0.06)], when analyzed either for all randomized infants or among survivors. No statistically significant differences were noted for mortality or for the combined outcome of mortality and CLD either at 28 days of age or at 36 weeks PMA. There were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on this updated review, there is no evidence from the trials reviewed that early administration (in the first two weeks of life) of inhaled steroids to ventilated preterm neonates was effective in reducing the incidence of CLD. Currently, use of inhaled steroids in this population cannot be recommended. Studies are needed to identify the risk/benefit ratio of different delivery techniques and dosing schedules for the administration of these medications. Studies need to address both the short-term and long-term benefits and adverse effects of inhaled steroids with particular attention to neurodevelopmental outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".