MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4253130351 · doi:10.13110/marvelstales.29.1.0147

Review

2015· article· en· W4253130351 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Masoni

Notice bibliographique

RevueMarvels & Tales · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWonderAsideNovellaNarrativeHistoryLiteratureArtPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Pleasant Nights by Giovan Francesco Straparola Licia Masoni (bio) The Pleasant Nights. By Giovan Francesco Straparola, vol. 1. Edited and with an Introduction by Donald Beecher. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012. 764pp. The Pleasant Nights promises to become an indispensable reference for narrative scholars, a long-hoped-for revised English translation and annotated edition of the Piacevoli Notti by Giovan Francesco Straparola (the first since The Nights of Straparola, by William George Waters, 1894) with a most informative and comprehensive introduction. Beecher’s text is the product of years of research and consultation of primary and secondary sources in more than four languages as well as published and unpublished oral narrative material, foreign editions of the Notti, and European collections of tales that were influenced by Straparola’s work. First published between 1550 and 1553 in two volumes (later collected in a single volume in 1558), the Piacevoli Notti brings together seventy-five novellas, jests, farces, anecdotes, fables, and wonder tales, varying from fantastic to vulgar and irreverent in tone, with sometimes explicit contents. Underestimated in Italian literature (in favor of Boccaccio and Basile), this collection has come to occupy a pivotal role in folk- and fairy-tale studies, most notably because it includes seventeen texts that are the first ever written records of wonder tales, including the earliest instances of plots such as “Puss in Boots” (ATU 545) (XI.1: Costantino Fortunato). Aside from the wonder tales, the entire nature of the collection raises fundamental questions about the interrelationships between oral and written texts. The Notti are inscribed in a narrative frame inspired by the Decamerone: during the Carnival period, on the island of Murano, in Lucrezia Sforza’s palace, ten young ladies take turns telling stories to their host and to a company of gentlemen to extend the joy of the evening balls, ending each of the thirteen nights with a riddle. Yet Straparola departs from the Boccaccian model and the tradition of the novellieri. We know hardly anything about this man or about his methods in compiling the Notti, but we do know that he brings together a variety of genres and elusively refers to them all in the proem as [End Page 147] favole (fables) written “not as he wished to write them, but as he heard them from the ladies who told them, neither adding nor taking anything away” (140). Indeed, whereas twenty-seven of Straparola’s seventy-five narratives have direct matches in literary sources, the rest do not (although these contain motifs that are common to stories that precede and follow them); thus most of the tales can be taken to represent the “first ‘hard evidence’ of their existence in the oral culture of the Renaissance” (39). How much can this collection tell us about the folk scene of its time? Straparola presents these stories with varying styles, including dialects. Were those the styles of the folk? Was Straparola a proto-folklorist? How closely might these texts approximate the ways in which the stories were orally performed? Had Straparola “heard” them in the salotti, or did he hear them among the lower strata of the population and then present them to the salotti audience for the first time through this book? The Notti appears at a turning point in history, and it continues to supply material and to set challenges for the study of the dialogue between high and popular culture. Beecher’s edition adds an invaluable voice to this dialogue. In his seven-part introduction (I, “The Straparola Dilemma, or the Biography of an Invisible Author”; II, “The Genre, Design, and Conventions of Le piacevoli notti”; III, “Polite Society and the Gaming Culture of Renaissance Italy”; IV, “Folk Culture, Wonder Tales, and Fairy Tales”; V, “The Enigmas”; VI, “The Publishing History of Le piacevoli notti”; VII, “The Translation and Editorial Procedures”), Beecher weaves a rich and revealing historical, political, literary, and social context around the collection, analyzing the different genres (in particular, the enigmas and wonder tales) as parts of a performance event shaped by the recreational practices of Renaissance society (veglie and gaming evenings), where “storytelling had gained a new venue for presentation, further enabling the movement...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,799
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,660

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,068
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMarvels & TalesMême sujetFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesTravaux en français237 207