MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Review

2015· article· en· W4253130351 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Masoni

Bibliographic record

VenueMarvels & Tales · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWonderAsideNovellaNarrativeHistoryLiteratureArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Pleasant Nights by Giovan Francesco Straparola Licia Masoni (bio) The Pleasant Nights. By Giovan Francesco Straparola, vol. 1. Edited and with an Introduction by Donald Beecher. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012. 764pp. The Pleasant Nights promises to become an indispensable reference for narrative scholars, a long-hoped-for revised English translation and annotated edition of the Piacevoli Notti by Giovan Francesco Straparola (the first since The Nights of Straparola, by William George Waters, 1894) with a most informative and comprehensive introduction. Beecher’s text is the product of years of research and consultation of primary and secondary sources in more than four languages as well as published and unpublished oral narrative material, foreign editions of the Notti, and European collections of tales that were influenced by Straparola’s work. First published between 1550 and 1553 in two volumes (later collected in a single volume in 1558), the Piacevoli Notti brings together seventy-five novellas, jests, farces, anecdotes, fables, and wonder tales, varying from fantastic to vulgar and irreverent in tone, with sometimes explicit contents. Underestimated in Italian literature (in favor of Boccaccio and Basile), this collection has come to occupy a pivotal role in folk- and fairy-tale studies, most notably because it includes seventeen texts that are the first ever written records of wonder tales, including the earliest instances of plots such as “Puss in Boots” (ATU 545) (XI.1: Costantino Fortunato). Aside from the wonder tales, the entire nature of the collection raises fundamental questions about the interrelationships between oral and written texts. The Notti are inscribed in a narrative frame inspired by the Decamerone: during the Carnival period, on the island of Murano, in Lucrezia Sforza’s palace, ten young ladies take turns telling stories to their host and to a company of gentlemen to extend the joy of the evening balls, ending each of the thirteen nights with a riddle. Yet Straparola departs from the Boccaccian model and the tradition of the novellieri. We know hardly anything about this man or about his methods in compiling the Notti, but we do know that he brings together a variety of genres and elusively refers to them all in the proem as [End Page 147] favole (fables) written “not as he wished to write them, but as he heard them from the ladies who told them, neither adding nor taking anything away” (140). Indeed, whereas twenty-seven of Straparola’s seventy-five narratives have direct matches in literary sources, the rest do not (although these contain motifs that are common to stories that precede and follow them); thus most of the tales can be taken to represent the “first ‘hard evidence’ of their existence in the oral culture of the Renaissance” (39). How much can this collection tell us about the folk scene of its time? Straparola presents these stories with varying styles, including dialects. Were those the styles of the folk? Was Straparola a proto-folklorist? How closely might these texts approximate the ways in which the stories were orally performed? Had Straparola “heard” them in the salotti, or did he hear them among the lower strata of the population and then present them to the salotti audience for the first time through this book? The Notti appears at a turning point in history, and it continues to supply material and to set challenges for the study of the dialogue between high and popular culture. Beecher’s edition adds an invaluable voice to this dialogue. In his seven-part introduction (I, “The Straparola Dilemma, or the Biography of an Invisible Author”; II, “The Genre, Design, and Conventions of Le piacevoli notti”; III, “Polite Society and the Gaming Culture of Renaissance Italy”; IV, “Folk Culture, Wonder Tales, and Fairy Tales”; V, “The Enigmas”; VI, “The Publishing History of Le piacevoli notti”; VII, “The Translation and Editorial Procedures”), Beecher weaves a rich and revealing historical, political, literary, and social context around the collection, analyzing the different genres (in particular, the enigmas and wonder tales) as parts of a performance event shaped by the recreational practices of Renaissance society (veglie and gaming evenings), where “storytelling had gained a new venue for presentation, further enabling the movement...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarvels & TalesSame topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207