MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4253585005 · doi:10.2523/74834-ms

New Downhole Tool Can Solve Depth Control Problems in Coiled-Tubing Fracturing Operations

2002· article· en· W4253585005 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael L. Connell, Robert Howard

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueDrilling and Well Engineering
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCitationExhibitionComputer scienceEngineeringWorld Wide WebArchaeologyHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

New Downhole Tool Can Solve Depth Control Problems in Coiled-Tubing Fracturing Operations M.L. Connell; M.L. Connell Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar R.G. Howard R.G. Howard Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, April 2002. Paper Number: SPE-74834-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/74834-MS Published: April 09 2002 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Connell, M.L., and R.G. Howard. "New Downhole Tool Can Solve Depth Control Problems in Coiled-Tubing Fracturing Operations." Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, April 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/74834-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractCoiled-tubing fracturing (CTF) operations are proving to be a safe, cost-effective way to stimulate wells. But, the straddle packers attached to the end of the coiled tubing must be precisely placed over the intervals to be fractured or the stimulation can be compromised. A new tool has been developed to help ensure proper placement of the packers in the wellbore. A log of the casing collars is generated and then correlated to existing well logs. Once the depth corrections are made, fracturing operations can commence.IntroductionThe use of coiled tubing to fracture wells is a relatively new service that many operators are finding ideally suited for some candidate fields. To date, the number of wells that have been fractured by coiled tubing is estimated to exceed 5,000. Most of these wells have been fractured in the last three to four years, and over one-third were fractured in 2001.Like many other types of services performed with coiled tubing, the limiting factor for well stimulations has been the size and strength of the coiled tubing itself. As tubing has grown larger and more robust, the opportunities for using coiled tubing have expanded. Nowhere is this more evident than in coiled-tubing fracturing operations.As fatigue life and strength have improved for large-diameter coiled tubing over the last few years, the economics of fracturing wells with coiled tubing have also improved. Previously, the short life of large coiled tubing made such operations impractical. To pay for the coiled tubing, service companies would have had to charge an inordinate amount to recover costs.Fracturing through coiled tubing is especially well suited to shallow wells with multiple thin zones. 1 With coiled tubing, these wells can be fractured in a much shorter time than with conventional methods. Often, the fracturing job can be completed in one day using coiled tubing. In Canada, two wells have been fractured in one day using the same equipment and crew. This is possible because the coiled tubing can reposition the packers quickly from one zone to the next and can do this in an underbalanced condition. Conventional fracturing operations with jointed pipe on a rig require that the well be in an overbalanced state before moving the tools to the next job.CTF operations have been carried out in Canada for several years, and in fact, most of the wells stimulated using this process have been in Canada. However, CTF operations have now been performed in several areas of the United States, most notably in Colorado, Texas, Alabama, and Virginia. In the United Kingdom, CTF operations have been performed in England and Ireland. Virtually all of these jobs have been performed on shallow, multizone onshore wells.The techniques used in CTF are similar regardless of the field. A large diameter coiled-tubing string is needed to achieve sufficient flow rates to properly fracture the zones.2 Most coiled-tubing strings being used are 2 3/8- or 2 7/8-in. diameter. Most of the coiled-tubing units (CTU) have an integral mast or derrick that is used to support the injector head and the lubricator. A lubricator is used so that the tools can be retrieved from the well in an underbalanced condition.Most of the toolstrings being used for CTF operations consist of some type of straddle packer.Fig. 1shows one of the more successful bottomhole packer assembly (BHPA) designs. The BHPA has been designed specifically for CTF operations and has these features:Equalizing valve-Allows pressure equalization before the packer is released and moved to the next zoneLower slip design-Does not require rotation of the outer mandrel to release, making packer unsetting easierCup top packer-Allows reverse circulation while running inhole for washing debrisMultiset-Capable of being set, unset, and moved many times reliablyThe BHPA shown has been used successfully during CTF operations on thousands of wells. Currently, it is available in 4 1/2- and 5 1/2-in. sizes. Keywords: upstream oil & gas, solve depth control problem, new downhole tool, wccl, connell, spe 74834, nozzle port, ctf operation, wireline log, howard spe 74834 Subjects: Completion Installation and Operations, Coiled tubing operations This content is only available via PDF. 2002. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,042

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,182
Écart entre enseignants0,170 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and ExhibitionMême sujetDrilling and Well EngineeringTravaux en français237 207