MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4253585005 · doi:10.2523/74834-ms

New Downhole Tool Can Solve Depth Control Problems in Coiled-Tubing Fracturing Operations

2002· article· en· W4253585005 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael L. Connell, Robert Howard

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationExhibitionComputer scienceEngineeringWorld Wide WebArchaeologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Downhole Tool Can Solve Depth Control Problems in Coiled-Tubing Fracturing Operations M.L. Connell; M.L. Connell Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar R.G. Howard R.G. Howard Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, April 2002. Paper Number: SPE-74834-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/74834-MS Published: April 09 2002 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Connell, M.L., and R.G. Howard. "New Downhole Tool Can Solve Depth Control Problems in Coiled-Tubing Fracturing Operations." Paper presented at the SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, April 2002. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/74834-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE/ICoTA Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition Search Advanced Search AbstractCoiled-tubing fracturing (CTF) operations are proving to be a safe, cost-effective way to stimulate wells. But, the straddle packers attached to the end of the coiled tubing must be precisely placed over the intervals to be fractured or the stimulation can be compromised. A new tool has been developed to help ensure proper placement of the packers in the wellbore. A log of the casing collars is generated and then correlated to existing well logs. Once the depth corrections are made, fracturing operations can commence.IntroductionThe use of coiled tubing to fracture wells is a relatively new service that many operators are finding ideally suited for some candidate fields. To date, the number of wells that have been fractured by coiled tubing is estimated to exceed 5,000. Most of these wells have been fractured in the last three to four years, and over one-third were fractured in 2001.Like many other types of services performed with coiled tubing, the limiting factor for well stimulations has been the size and strength of the coiled tubing itself. As tubing has grown larger and more robust, the opportunities for using coiled tubing have expanded. Nowhere is this more evident than in coiled-tubing fracturing operations.As fatigue life and strength have improved for large-diameter coiled tubing over the last few years, the economics of fracturing wells with coiled tubing have also improved. Previously, the short life of large coiled tubing made such operations impractical. To pay for the coiled tubing, service companies would have had to charge an inordinate amount to recover costs.Fracturing through coiled tubing is especially well suited to shallow wells with multiple thin zones. 1 With coiled tubing, these wells can be fractured in a much shorter time than with conventional methods. Often, the fracturing job can be completed in one day using coiled tubing. In Canada, two wells have been fractured in one day using the same equipment and crew. This is possible because the coiled tubing can reposition the packers quickly from one zone to the next and can do this in an underbalanced condition. Conventional fracturing operations with jointed pipe on a rig require that the well be in an overbalanced state before moving the tools to the next job.CTF operations have been carried out in Canada for several years, and in fact, most of the wells stimulated using this process have been in Canada. However, CTF operations have now been performed in several areas of the United States, most notably in Colorado, Texas, Alabama, and Virginia. In the United Kingdom, CTF operations have been performed in England and Ireland. Virtually all of these jobs have been performed on shallow, multizone onshore wells.The techniques used in CTF are similar regardless of the field. A large diameter coiled-tubing string is needed to achieve sufficient flow rates to properly fracture the zones.2 Most coiled-tubing strings being used are 2 3/8- or 2 7/8-in. diameter. Most of the coiled-tubing units (CTU) have an integral mast or derrick that is used to support the injector head and the lubricator. A lubricator is used so that the tools can be retrieved from the well in an underbalanced condition.Most of the toolstrings being used for CTF operations consist of some type of straddle packer.Fig. 1shows one of the more successful bottomhole packer assembly (BHPA) designs. The BHPA has been designed specifically for CTF operations and has these features:Equalizing valve-Allows pressure equalization before the packer is released and moved to the next zoneLower slip design-Does not require rotation of the outer mandrel to release, making packer unsetting easierCup top packer-Allows reverse circulation while running inhole for washing debrisMultiset-Capable of being set, unset, and moved many times reliablyThe BHPA shown has been used successfully during CTF operations on thousands of wells. Currently, it is available in 4 1/2- and 5 1/2-in. sizes. Keywords: upstream oil & gas, solve depth control problem, new downhole tool, wccl, connell, spe 74834, nozzle port, ctf operation, wireline log, howard spe 74834 Subjects: Completion Installation and Operations, Coiled tubing operations This content is only available via PDF. 2002. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Conference and ExhibitionSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207