Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
05–135 Armstrong, Kevin (Leicester U, UK; ka50@le.ac.uk ), Sexing up the dossier: a semantic analysis of phrasal verbs for language teachers . Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK) 13 .4 (2004), 213–224. 05–136 Baker, William & Boonkit, Kamonpan (Silpakorn U, Thailand; willmlbaker@yahoo.co.uk ), Learning strategies in reading and writing: EAP contexts . RELC Journal (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) 35 .3 (2004), 299–328. 05–137 Bell, N. (Indiana U of Pennsylvania, USA), Exploring L2 language play as an aid to SLL: a case study of humour in NS–NNS interaction . Applied Linguistics (Oxford, UK) 26 .2 (2005), 192–218. 05–138 Bohn, Mariko T . (Stanford U, USA; mbohn@stanford.edu ), Japanese classroom behavior: a micro-analysis of self-reports versus classroom observations – with implications for language teachers . Applied Language Learning (Monterey, CA, USA) 14 .1 (2004), 1–35. 05–139 Bryan, S. (Arizona State U East, USA), The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication . TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria, VA, USA) 39 .1 (2005), 33–58. 05–140 Byon, Andrew Sangpil (U at Albany, State U of New York, USA; abyon@albany.edu ), Learning linguistic politeness . Applied Language Learning (Monterey, CA, USA) 14 .1 (2004), 37–62. 05–141 Cekaite, A. & Aronsson, K. (Linköping U, Sweden), Language play, a collaborative resource in children's L2 learning . Applied Linguistics (Oxford, UK) 26 .2 (2005), 169–191. 05–142 Culhane, Stephen F . (Kagoshima U, Japan; culhane@pacall.org ) & Umeda, Chisako (Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific U, Japan), Authentic second language interaction in an instructional setting: assessing an inter-class exchange programme . RELC Journal (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) 35 .3 (2004), 281–298. 05–143 Dancer, Diane & Kamvounias, Patty (Sydney U, Australia; d.dancer@econ.usyd.edu.ac ), Student involvement in assessment: a project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Abingdon, UK) 30 .4 (2005), 445–454. 05–144 Dong, Naiting (Jiangsu Polytechnic U, China), Failures of intercultural communication caused by translating from Chinese into English . English Today (Cambridge, UK) 21 .1 (2005), 11–16. 05–145 Egi, Takako (Florida U, USA; tegi@aall.ufl.edu ), Verbal reports, noticing, and SLA research . Language Awareness (Clevedon, UK) 13 .4 (2004), 243–264. 05–146 Fernández Toledo, Piedad (Murcia U, Spain; piedad@um.es ), Genre analysis and reading of English as a foreign language: genre schemata beyond text typologies . Journal of Pragmatics (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) 37 .7 (2005), 1059–1079. 05–147 Fisher, Linda, Evans, Michael & Esch, Edith (U of Cambridge, UK; igf20@cam.ac.uk ), Computer-mediated communication: promoting learner autonomy and intercultural understanding at secondary level . Language Learning Journal (Rugby, UK) 30 (2004), 50–58. 05–148 Gass, Susan & Alvarez Torres, Maria José (Michigan State U, USA; gass@msu.edu ), Attention when? An investigation of the ordering effect of input and interaction . Studies in Second Language Acquisition (Cambridge, UK) 27 .1 (2005), 1–31. 05–149 Hawkins, M. (U of Wisconsin, USA), Becoming a student: identity work and academic literacies in early schooling . TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria, VA, USA) 39 .1 (2005), 159–182. 05–150 Hosali, Priya (CIEFL, Hyderabad, India), Butler English . English Today (Cambridge, UK) 21 .1 (2005), 34–39. 05–151 Jackson, Jane (Chinese U of Hong Kong, China; jjackson@arts.cuhk.edu.hk ), Language and cultural immersion: an ethnographic case study . RELC Journal (Thousand Oaks, CA, USA) 35 .3 (2004), 261–279. 05–152 Kintsch, W. (Colorado U, USA), An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: the CI perspective . Discourse Processes (Mahwah, NJ, USA) 39 .2/3 (2005), 125–128. 05–153 Koyama, Jill P . (Columbia U, USA), Appropriating policy: constructing positions for English language learners . Bilingual Research Journal (Tempe, AZ, USA) 28 . 3 (2004), 401–423. 05–154 Lambacher, Stephen G. (Aizu U, Japan; steeve@u-aizu.ac.jp ) , Martens, William, L., Kakehi, Kazukiko, Marasinghe, Chandrajith, A. & Molholt, Garry , The effects of identification training on the identification and production of American English vowels by native speakers of Japanese . Applied Psycholinguistics (Cambridge, UK), 26 .2 (2005), 227–247. 05–155 McDonough, Kim (U of Illinois, USA; mcdonokr@uiuc.edu ), Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners' responses on ESL question development . Studies in Second Language Acquisition (Cambridge, UK) 27 .1 (2005), 79–103. 05–156 Meara, Paul (U of Wales Swansea, UK; p.m.meara@swansea.ac.uk ), Lexical frequency profiles: a Monte Carlo analysis . Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 26 .1 (2005), 32–47. 05–157 Read, John (Victoria U of Wellington, New Zealand; john.read@vuw.ac.nz ), Research in teaching vocabulary . Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (Cambridge, UK) 24 (2004), 146–161. 05–158 Richardson, John T. (Open U, UK; j.t.e.richardson@open.ac.uk ), Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Abingdon, UK) 30 .4 (2005), 387–415. 05–159 Savage, Robert (Institute of Education, London U, UK) & Carless, Sue , Learning support assistants can deliver effective reading interventions for ‘at-risk’ children . Educational Research (Abingdon, UK) 47 .1 (2005), 45–61. 05–160 Schmenk, B. (U of Waterloo, Canada), Globalizing learner autonomy . TESOL Quarterly (Alexandria, VA, USA) 39 .1 (2005), 107–118. 05–161 Sheard, Susan & Markham, Selby (Monash U, Australia), Web based learning environments: developing a framework for evaluation . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Abingdon, UK) 30 .4 (2005), 353–368. 05–162 Smartt, Jerry, T. (Friends U, USA) & Scudde
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle