Safety Performance of the Global E&P Industry: From Data to Initiatives
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Safety Performance of the Global E&P Industry: from data to initiatives Smith Don Smith Don International Association of Oil and Gas Producers Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86824-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86824-MS Published: March 29 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Don, Smith. "Safety Performance of the Global E&P Industry: from data to initiatives." Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86824-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Search Advanced Search AbstractSince 1985 the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers1 (OGP) has been collecting, analysing and reporting safety performance data on behalf of the global E&P industry. For 2002, OGP received over 2,000 million workhours of E&P safety performance data, submitted by 35 companies, from their operations in 71 countries.The paper presents the results from the analysis of the 2002 dataset. The 2002 statistics are compared to those of the proceeding 11 year period.Analysis of the data shows that over the period 1991–2002 the industry has achieved a considerable improvement in its Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF), however little improvement is seen in Fatal Accident Rate (FAR) or Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR). For 2002, all these high level indicators were reported at their lowest values on record.In common with previous years, the most common types of incident leading to fatalities were vehicle related incidents, and persons being struck by moving or falling objects.IntroductionThe International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP:http://www.ogp.org.uk) has, since 1985, been collecting and reporting data relating to the safety performance of the global upstream oil and gas industry. This it has done through a series of annual publications, the latest of which is 'Safety Performance of the Global E&P Industry" [1].These reports serve a range of purposes. Firstly, they present to the widest audience possible how the industry has performed, year on year, on a range of key safety measures. Secondly, it allows E&P organisations to benchmark their performance against that of their peers. Thirdly, it assists the industry to identify areas where it may need to concentrate effort. Most recently this has led to the formation of an OGP Land Transportation Task Force, the aim of which is to identify initiatives that may help to reduce the number of vehicle related incidents.This paper presents the results of the analysis of the 2002 dataset. Industry recognised safety performance indicators are presented; Fatal Accident Rate (FAR), Fatal Incident Rate (FIR), Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) and Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR). The 2002 data are compared with data from the preceeding 11 year period.The performance of both company and contractor personnel are compared, as are onshore and offshore performance indicators.In addition to occupational injury data, the industry provides occupational illness data to OGP for analysis and reporting. However this paper is limited to a review of the occupational injury data. A review of the occupational illness data submitted to OGP for 2002 is available within a separate publication.The paper provides a summary of the key features of 2002 safety performance statistics. The full analysis, including descriptions of each fatal incident and descriptions of significant incidents reported to OGP, is available within the annual report [1]. Keywords: recordable incident rate, occupational injury, workhour, time injury frequency, contractor, medical treatment case, hsse reporting, fatal accident rate, incident, safety performance Subjects: HSSE & Social Responsibility Management, Safety, HSSE reporting This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,021 | 0,112 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,017 | 0,051 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,018 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».