Safety Performance of the Global E&P Industry: From Data to Initiatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Safety Performance of the Global E&P Industry: from data to initiatives Smith Don Smith Don International Association of Oil and Gas Producers Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. Paper Number: SPE-86824-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/86824-MS Published: March 29 2004 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Don, Smith. "Safety Performance of the Global E&P Industry: from data to initiatives." Paper presented at the SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, March 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/86824-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE International Conference and Exhibition on Health, Safety, Environment, and Sustainability Search Advanced Search AbstractSince 1985 the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers1 (OGP) has been collecting, analysing and reporting safety performance data on behalf of the global E&P industry. For 2002, OGP received over 2,000 million workhours of E&P safety performance data, submitted by 35 companies, from their operations in 71 countries.The paper presents the results from the analysis of the 2002 dataset. The 2002 statistics are compared to those of the proceeding 11 year period.Analysis of the data shows that over the period 1991–2002 the industry has achieved a considerable improvement in its Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF), however little improvement is seen in Fatal Accident Rate (FAR) or Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR). For 2002, all these high level indicators were reported at their lowest values on record.In common with previous years, the most common types of incident leading to fatalities were vehicle related incidents, and persons being struck by moving or falling objects.IntroductionThe International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP:http://www.ogp.org.uk) has, since 1985, been collecting and reporting data relating to the safety performance of the global upstream oil and gas industry. This it has done through a series of annual publications, the latest of which is 'Safety Performance of the Global E&P Industry" [1].These reports serve a range of purposes. Firstly, they present to the widest audience possible how the industry has performed, year on year, on a range of key safety measures. Secondly, it allows E&P organisations to benchmark their performance against that of their peers. Thirdly, it assists the industry to identify areas where it may need to concentrate effort. Most recently this has led to the formation of an OGP Land Transportation Task Force, the aim of which is to identify initiatives that may help to reduce the number of vehicle related incidents.This paper presents the results of the analysis of the 2002 dataset. Industry recognised safety performance indicators are presented; Fatal Accident Rate (FAR), Fatal Incident Rate (FIR), Lost Time Injury Frequency (LTIF) and Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR). The 2002 data are compared with data from the preceeding 11 year period.The performance of both company and contractor personnel are compared, as are onshore and offshore performance indicators.In addition to occupational injury data, the industry provides occupational illness data to OGP for analysis and reporting. However this paper is limited to a review of the occupational injury data. A review of the occupational illness data submitted to OGP for 2002 is available within a separate publication.The paper provides a summary of the key features of 2002 safety performance statistics. The full analysis, including descriptions of each fatal incident and descriptions of significant incidents reported to OGP, is available within the annual report [1]. Keywords: recordable incident rate, occupational injury, workhour, time injury frequency, contractor, medical treatment case, hsse reporting, fatal accident rate, incident, safety performance Subjects: HSSE & Social Responsibility Management, Safety, HSSE reporting This content is only available via PDF. 2004. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.112 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.017 | 0.051 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.018 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".