MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4256076182 · doi:10.1108/s0732-067120200000041011

Index

2020· paratext· en· W4256076182 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typeparatext
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueLibrary Science and Administration
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)Library sciencePublishingSociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceGeographyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Citation (2020), "Index", Hines, S.S. and Ketchum, D.H. (Ed.) Critical Librarianship (Advances in Library Administration and Organization, Vol. 41), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 161-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-067120200000041011 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited Copyright © 2020 Emerald Publishing Limited INDEX Academic libraries, 86 accommodation process, 124 autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), 113 campus career services department, 95 democracy, 9 ethnicity, 87 exclusion, 27–29 human resources practices, 122 information and knowledge resources, 6 interviews, 119 leadership level, 87 librarian power, 7–8 Library and Information Science (LIS). See Library and Information Science (LIS) marginalization, 27–29 mentoring, 97 nonmeritocratic system, 112 onboarding, 121 power dynamics. See Power dynamics public spheres, 6, 8–9 racial microaggressions, 87, 102 theoretical context, 9–11 user empowerment, 8 Web 2.0 technologies, 6, 9 widening access and participation (WP), 26 Accessibility Legislation, 122 Advocacy feminism, 49–50 American Library Association (ALA), 2 Aspirational capitals, 32 Association of Library and Information Science Education (ALISE), 94 Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) behaviors, 117 definition, 113 diagnosis, 117 interviewing, 119–121 job seekers, 117 modeling and simulation, 123 onboarding, 121 performance management and promotion, 125–126 positive behavioral support (PBS), 117 recruitment, 117–119 retention and development, 123–125 social interaction, 114 statistics, 113 symptoms, 113 Zwicker’ s analysis, 115 Banking model, 31 Behavioral interviewing, 148 Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME), 25 ClimateQUAL, 103 Communication, 17, 45, 55, 57, 59–60, 113 Competency modeling, 149–150 Consensus-based decision-making, 58–59 Critical information literacy, 31 Critical librarianship, 131 Critical reflection, 35 Critical Success Factors (CSFs) definition, 15 library management, 15 service delivery processes, 16 user empowerment, 16 Web 2.0, 16, 17 Critical theory, 12–14, 22, 30–31, 34–36 Critlib leadership, 29–31 Cultural recognition, 31–33 Democracy, 9 Descriptive power, 8 Diversity and inclusion (D&I), 88–90 Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), 88, 97, 99 Education workers, 33–34 Emotional intelligence, 45 Emotional Quotient Inventory, 153 interpersonal skills component, 154 role of, 150–152 teamwork skills, 152 Empowerment, 8 Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), 88–89 create roadmap, 92 establish timeline, 92 imagine future, 92 measure progress, 92 Exclusion, academic libraries, 27–29 Facebook, 6 Familial capitals, 33 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 131–132, 134 Family-friendly policies, 133, 135 paid maternity leave, 137–138 remote work/working from home, 139 Feminist leadership advocacy, 49–50, 53–54 anti-oppression work, 45 caregiving responsibilities, 50–52 communication, 45, 55, 57, 59–60 decision-making, 57–61 demographic descriptors, 46 emotional intelligence, 45 institutional characteristics, 47 intersectional feminism, 49 knowledge, 48 organizational structure, 54–57 reform feminism, 48–49 revolutionary feminism, 49 self-identify, 42 sharing power value, 42 Intellectual crisis, 9 Intersectional feminism, 49 Leadership skills, 144 Librarian power, 7–8 Library and Information Science (LIS) critical theory, 12–14 ontological approaches, 11–12 scholars, 9–10 significant theoretical contributions, 10 social epistemology, 11 Library management, 15 Library of Congress (LOC), 1 Linguistic capitals, 32 Lyon Declaration principles, 8 Marginalization, 27–29 Maternity leave, 131, 133, 135 benefits, 136 British women, 136 coaching, 139–140 family-friendly policies, 137–138 flexback, 138 German mothers, 139 Mentoring, 97–98, 100 MetLife, 92–93 Misrecognition, 31–33 Motherhood, 132–134 National Autistic Society, 118 Navigational capitals, 33 Neurodevelopmental condition, 113 Neutral social science, 27 Ontological approaches, Library and Information Science (LIS), 11–12 Paid maternity leave, 135 Participatory pedagogy, 30 People of color (POC), 88, 97–101 Personnel selection, 148, 154 Positive behavioral support (PBS), 117 Power dynamics Critical Success Factors (CSFs), 15–17 Library and Information Science (LIS), 11 theoretical/philosophical approaches, 9 Web 2.0, 14–15 Pregnancy, 132 Problem-posing education, 31 Public spheres, 6, 8–9 Race/ethnicity comparisons, 86 Re-conceptualizing academic libraries, 17 Recruitment strategy, 93, 95, 103 Reform feminism, 48–49 Remote work, 139 Residency programs, 96 Resistant capitals, 33 Retention, 92, 94, 97, 100 Return-to-work, 136, 137, 139 Re-use model, 12 Revolutionary feminism, 49 Safe learning spaces, 29 Schedule adjustments flexible work schedule, 138 infant-at-work program, 140 job sharing, 139 maternity coaching, 139–140 part-time, 138–139 remote work, 139 Self-identify, 42 Self-managing work teams, 146 Service delivery processes, 16 Shared conceptualization, 11 Sharing power value, 42 Situational interviewing, 149 Social capitals, 33, 123 Social epistemology, 11 Social exchange theory, 135 Social justice access to, 73–75 institution, 68–71 street-level bureaucracy, 66–68 sustainable communities, 75–79 traditional library services, 71–72 Supervisors advocate, better leave policies, 134–135 discussions before leave, 136–137 family-friendly policies, 137–138 inclusive atmosphere, 137 policies, 135–136 Target Corporation, 88, 89 Team-based organizations, 144, 145 Teamwork skills, 147 and emotional intelligence, 152 integrative taxonomy, 148 verbal and nonverbal communication, 153 T-Mobile, 101–104 Twitter, 6 Under-represented groups, United Kingdom, 24 University of Houston (UH) Libraries, 153 University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG), 94 User empowerment, 8, 16 User knowledge-sharing community, 12 Web 2.0 technologies academic libraries, 6, 9 Critical Success Factors (CSFs), 16, 17 democracy, 9 power dynamics, 14–15 Widening access and participation (WP) academic libraries, 26 Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME), 25 critically reflective practice, 35 Critlib leadership, 29–31 cultural recognition, 31–33 dividing practices, 23 education workers, 33–34 England, 23–26 misrecognition, 31–33 shock of recognition, 22 under-represented groups, 24 United Kingdom, 23–26 working-class students, 22 Wi-Fi hotspots, 8 Working mothers, 132, 133, 136 Book Chapters Prelims Introduction: Critical Librarianship Theoretical and Practical Implications of Power Dynamics in Academic Libraries Widening Participation Praxis and Library Leadership Feminists at Work: Organizational Leadership in Academic Libraries From Street-level Bureaucracy to Sustainable Communities: Librarianship for Social Justice in Times of Limited Resources Looking Beyond Libraries for Inclusive Recruitment and Retention Practices: Four Successful Approaches Countering Conformity: Embracing the “Other” and Supporting Employees with High-functioning Autism in Canadian Academic Libraries Going Back to Work: How Supervisors Can Support New Mothers as They Transition Back to the Library Teamwork, Emotional Intelligence, and the Skills Organizations Need Now Author Biographies Index

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,037
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,956

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0600,045

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,338
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetLibrary Science and AdministrationTravaux en français237 207