MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Index

2020· paratext· en· W4256076182 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Administration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Library sciencePublishingSociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Citation (2020), "Index", Hines, S.S. and Ketchum, D.H. (Ed.) Critical Librarianship (Advances in Library Administration and Organization, Vol. 41), Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 161-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-067120200000041011 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited Copyright © 2020 Emerald Publishing Limited INDEX Academic libraries, 86 accommodation process, 124 autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), 113 campus career services department, 95 democracy, 9 ethnicity, 87 exclusion, 27–29 human resources practices, 122 information and knowledge resources, 6 interviews, 119 leadership level, 87 librarian power, 7–8 Library and Information Science (LIS). See Library and Information Science (LIS) marginalization, 27–29 mentoring, 97 nonmeritocratic system, 112 onboarding, 121 power dynamics. See Power dynamics public spheres, 6, 8–9 racial microaggressions, 87, 102 theoretical context, 9–11 user empowerment, 8 Web 2.0 technologies, 6, 9 widening access and participation (WP), 26 Accessibility Legislation, 122 Advocacy feminism, 49–50 American Library Association (ALA), 2 Aspirational capitals, 32 Association of Library and Information Science Education (ALISE), 94 Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) behaviors, 117 definition, 113 diagnosis, 117 interviewing, 119–121 job seekers, 117 modeling and simulation, 123 onboarding, 121 performance management and promotion, 125–126 positive behavioral support (PBS), 117 recruitment, 117–119 retention and development, 123–125 social interaction, 114 statistics, 113 symptoms, 113 Zwicker’ s analysis, 115 Banking model, 31 Behavioral interviewing, 148 Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME), 25 ClimateQUAL, 103 Communication, 17, 45, 55, 57, 59–60, 113 Competency modeling, 149–150 Consensus-based decision-making, 58–59 Critical information literacy, 31 Critical librarianship, 131 Critical reflection, 35 Critical Success Factors (CSFs) definition, 15 library management, 15 service delivery processes, 16 user empowerment, 16 Web 2.0, 16, 17 Critical theory, 12–14, 22, 30–31, 34–36 Critlib leadership, 29–31 Cultural recognition, 31–33 Democracy, 9 Descriptive power, 8 Diversity and inclusion (D&I), 88–90 Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), 88, 97, 99 Education workers, 33–34 Emotional intelligence, 45 Emotional Quotient Inventory, 153 interpersonal skills component, 154 role of, 150–152 teamwork skills, 152 Empowerment, 8 Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), 88–89 create roadmap, 92 establish timeline, 92 imagine future, 92 measure progress, 92 Exclusion, academic libraries, 27–29 Facebook, 6 Familial capitals, 33 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 131–132, 134 Family-friendly policies, 133, 135 paid maternity leave, 137–138 remote work/working from home, 139 Feminist leadership advocacy, 49–50, 53–54 anti-oppression work, 45 caregiving responsibilities, 50–52 communication, 45, 55, 57, 59–60 decision-making, 57–61 demographic descriptors, 46 emotional intelligence, 45 institutional characteristics, 47 intersectional feminism, 49 knowledge, 48 organizational structure, 54–57 reform feminism, 48–49 revolutionary feminism, 49 self-identify, 42 sharing power value, 42 Intellectual crisis, 9 Intersectional feminism, 49 Leadership skills, 144 Librarian power, 7–8 Library and Information Science (LIS) critical theory, 12–14 ontological approaches, 11–12 scholars, 9–10 significant theoretical contributions, 10 social epistemology, 11 Library management, 15 Library of Congress (LOC), 1 Linguistic capitals, 32 Lyon Declaration principles, 8 Marginalization, 27–29 Maternity leave, 131, 133, 135 benefits, 136 British women, 136 coaching, 139–140 family-friendly policies, 137–138 flexback, 138 German mothers, 139 Mentoring, 97–98, 100 MetLife, 92–93 Misrecognition, 31–33 Motherhood, 132–134 National Autistic Society, 118 Navigational capitals, 33 Neurodevelopmental condition, 113 Neutral social science, 27 Ontological approaches, Library and Information Science (LIS), 11–12 Paid maternity leave, 135 Participatory pedagogy, 30 People of color (POC), 88, 97–101 Personnel selection, 148, 154 Positive behavioral support (PBS), 117 Power dynamics Critical Success Factors (CSFs), 15–17 Library and Information Science (LIS), 11 theoretical/philosophical approaches, 9 Web 2.0, 14–15 Pregnancy, 132 Problem-posing education, 31 Public spheres, 6, 8–9 Race/ethnicity comparisons, 86 Re-conceptualizing academic libraries, 17 Recruitment strategy, 93, 95, 103 Reform feminism, 48–49 Remote work, 139 Residency programs, 96 Resistant capitals, 33 Retention, 92, 94, 97, 100 Return-to-work, 136, 137, 139 Re-use model, 12 Revolutionary feminism, 49 Safe learning spaces, 29 Schedule adjustments flexible work schedule, 138 infant-at-work program, 140 job sharing, 139 maternity coaching, 139–140 part-time, 138–139 remote work, 139 Self-identify, 42 Self-managing work teams, 146 Service delivery processes, 16 Shared conceptualization, 11 Sharing power value, 42 Situational interviewing, 149 Social capitals, 33, 123 Social epistemology, 11 Social exchange theory, 135 Social justice access to, 73–75 institution, 68–71 street-level bureaucracy, 66–68 sustainable communities, 75–79 traditional library services, 71–72 Supervisors advocate, better leave policies, 134–135 discussions before leave, 136–137 family-friendly policies, 137–138 inclusive atmosphere, 137 policies, 135–136 Target Corporation, 88, 89 Team-based organizations, 144, 145 Teamwork skills, 147 and emotional intelligence, 152 integrative taxonomy, 148 verbal and nonverbal communication, 153 T-Mobile, 101–104 Twitter, 6 Under-represented groups, United Kingdom, 24 University of Houston (UH) Libraries, 153 University of North Carolina at Greensboro (UNCG), 94 User empowerment, 8, 16 User knowledge-sharing community, 12 Web 2.0 technologies academic libraries, 6, 9 Critical Success Factors (CSFs), 16, 17 democracy, 9 power dynamics, 14–15 Widening access and participation (WP) academic libraries, 26 Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME), 25 critically reflective practice, 35 Critlib leadership, 29–31 cultural recognition, 31–33 dividing practices, 23 education workers, 33–34 England, 23–26 misrecognition, 31–33 shock of recognition, 22 under-represented groups, 24 United Kingdom, 23–26 working-class students, 22 Wi-Fi hotspots, 8 Working mothers, 132, 133, 136 Book Chapters Prelims Introduction: Critical Librarianship Theoretical and Practical Implications of Power Dynamics in Academic Libraries Widening Participation Praxis and Library Leadership Feminists at Work: Organizational Leadership in Academic Libraries From Street-level Bureaucracy to Sustainable Communities: Librarianship for Social Justice in Times of Limited Resources Looking Beyond Libraries for Inclusive Recruitment and Retention Practices: Four Successful Approaches Countering Conformity: Embracing the “Other” and Supporting Employees with High-functioning Autism in Canadian Academic Libraries Going Back to Work: How Supervisors Can Support New Mothers as They Transition Back to the Library Teamwork, Emotional Intelligence, and the Skills Organizations Need Now Author Biographies Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLibrary Science and AdministrationFrench-language works237,207